To the darwinists - Worthy Christian Forums

Even a biologist wouldn't necessarily have the answer to every question. If you asked a question regarding the evolution of the osprey to an entomologist, then there's no shame in them not having specific answers. Biology is a big field, and one could devote their entire life to its study and still only be deeply versed in a small section of it.

Indeed, one of the fundamental axioms of scientific research is that our current knowledge is to some extent inaccuate, and is in the process of being refined. It is, after all, a field where someone will spend years feverently promoting their theory, then listen to someone else's lecture and at the end say, "Thank you, I have been wrong all these years." It's why it's hilarious when people try to argue that theory X is flawed because it changes. A field devoted to the expansion of human knowledge is fluid and changeable by its very nature, since any addition of knowledge changes it. You'd think this would be intuitive, but apparently it isn't.

I did. You're making the claim that cause we're "scientists" we should have more evidence. None of us have said we are. So when we're mistaken or we don't have the answer, calm down.

I'm still waiting for the 'scientifically inclined' to post the definitive evidence for a common ancestor; the evidence they have repeatedly claimed exists.

And what alternate mechanism do you proposose to explain the fact that organisms are distributed so that not only are more similar species geographically close to each other, but they also without exception share more DNA in common with each other than with closer species than with more distant species? How does said theory explain why all vertebrates share the same eye structure, which is objectively inferior to that of squids (which have the far more sensible eye structure shared by all cephalapods)? How does it explain why similar species share the same defects (such as the common defect of all primates which makes them unable to synthesise their own Vitamin C, even though other animal families are able to do just that). How does your alternate mechanism explain the fact that flowering plants are found in fossil layers dating to the Cretaceous, but not in earlier layers?

and yet none of you super smart evolutionist types can produce any concrete evidence to refute creation, or any concrete evidence to support common ancestory.

Did you even read my previous post where I asked for creationist explanations for the following phoenomena (all of which can be explained by common ancestry)?

And what alternate mechanism do you proposose to explain the fact that organisms are distributed so that not only are more similar species geographically close to each other, but they also without exception share more DNA in common with each other than with closer species than with more distant species?

How does said theory explain why all vertebrates share the same eye structure, which is objectively inferior to that of squids (which have the far more sensible eye structure shared by all cephalapods)?

How does it explain why similar species share the same defects (such as the common defect of all primates which makes them unable to synthesise their own Vitamin C, even though other animal families are able to do just that).

How does your alternate mechanism explain the fact that flowering plants are found in fossil layers dating to the Cretaceous, but not in earlier layers?

Are you too scared to look for the answer these questions or something?

and yet none of you super smart evolutionist types can produce any concrete evidence to refute creation, or any concrete evidence to support common ancestory.

I am not a super-smart evolutionary type, at all (though I'm learning more, faster than ever before, thanks to encouragement by this board).

Here is a link (PLEASE mods, don't take this one down!)

People have asked for evidence PLEASE READ the information, and let me know what you think.

"Most species' DNA is similar. Shows a common Creator who was smart enough to make a template that could be used over and over again. You know about DNA being only four symbols, right?"

wow. God needed a template? Much easier to believe God created the process of evolution-

98 percent of human DNA is made up of introns (nonsensical section of DNA) and only 2percent of DNA actually contains genetic instructions.