Jump to content

christian forums

Worthy Christian Forums - Christian Forums

Welcome to Worthy Christian Forums
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Photo

Hope In Christ

* * * * * 1 votes

This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
21 replies to this topic

#1
Seriousseeker

Seriousseeker

    Junior Member

  • Junior Member
  • PipPip
  • 110 posts
Here is a thought for non-believers to consider.


HOW HOPE MATTERS

Contemplating Judgment


If you walked on earth in heavenly hope

And was quite settled in your bliss;

What would it matter if death is the end

And you then left the world like this?


If you lived your days with faith in God's Son

And had peace and joy at the last;

Could it matter at all if hope should fail

And there's nothing when life is past?


If you disallow God, His love and truth

As the Bible truly does tell;

Should that matter now as you ponder life

If your end might sadly be hell?


If you miss heaven's joy and all that's good

And you find the Bible was true;

If you die so soon and know not God's Son,

What will it then matter to you?


- R. L. DeWitt, 7/04



#2
Parker1

Parker1

    Royal Member

  • Royal Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,123 posts
You hope!

#3
FresnoJoe

FresnoJoe

    Royal Member

  • Worthy Watchman
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 43,044 posts

And if you go to hell, you’ll be so busy shaking hands with all your friends... You won’t have time to worry!


Shake, Shake, Shake And Bake

And if thine eye offend thee, pluck it out: it is better for thee to enter into the kingdom of God with one eye, than having two eyes to be cast into hell fire:
Where their worm dieth not, and the fire is not quenched.
Mark 9:47-48

With Nary A Drop To Drink

And he cried and said, Father Abraham, have mercy on me, and send Lazarus, that he may dip the tip of his finger in water, and cool my tongue; for I am tormented in this flame. Luke 16:24

And All Because You Say Nay Nay

The Father loveth the Son, and hath given all things into his hand. He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him. John 3:35-36

So What Kind Of Logic Was That?

~

Believe

Trust in the LORD with all thine heart; and lean not unto thine own understanding.
In all thy ways acknowledge him, and he shall direct thy paths.


Be not wise in thine own eyes: fear the LORD, and depart from evil.
It shall be health to thy navel, and marrow to thy bones
. Proverbs 3:5-8

And Be Blessed Beloved

For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. John 3:16

Love, Joe

#4
redroses42

redroses42

    Advanced Member

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 378 posts
the Lord is nigh unto all them that call upon Him Ps 145-18

#5
JPPT1974

JPPT1974
  • Newbie
  • 3 posts
Hope in Christ is No Hope Without Him!

#6
nickname

nickname
  • Nonbeliever
  • 52 posts
Fresnojoe, your posts always look to me like they are written in iambic pentameter for some reason. The aforementioned logic was from an old Irish anecdote, and not meant to be taken too seriously. There's a Japanese story along the same lines:

There was once a man who was being chased by a ferocious tiger across a field. At the edge of the field there was a cliff. In order to escape the jaws of the tiger, the man caught hold of a vine and swung himself over the edge of the cliff. Dangling down, he saw, to his dismay, there were more tigers on the ground below him! And, furthermore, two little mice were gnawing on the vine to which he clung. He knew that at any moment he would fall to certain death. That's when he noticed a wild strawberry growing on the cliff wall. Clutching the vine with one hand, he plucked the strawberry with the other and put it in his mouth.

He never before realized how sweet a strawberry could taste.

#7
chloe_fantastic

chloe_fantastic

    Senior Member

  • Worthy Watchman
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,362 posts
That story makes me sad, Nick. :(

#8
Jayyycuuup

Jayyycuuup

    Senior Member

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,405 posts


Here is a thought for non-believers to consider.


HOW HOPE MATTERS

Contemplating Judgment


If you walked on earth in heavenly hope

And was quite settled in your bliss;

What would it matter if death is the end

And you then left the world like this?


If you lived your days with faith in God's Son

And had peace and joy at the last;

Could it matter at all if hope should fail

And there's nothing when life is past?


If you disallow God, His love and truth

As the Bible truly does tell;

Should that matter now as you ponder life

If your end might sadly be hell?


If you miss heaven's joy and all that's good

And you find the Bible was true;

If you die so soon and know not God's Son,

What will it then matter to you?


- R. L. DeWitt, 7/04


Hi Seriousseeker,

First of all, happy new year!

As an unbeliever, I feel addressed and I am always interested in possible logical justifications to believe in Christianity. My initial post was too lazy from my side and has been correctly deleted, to avoid further misunderstandings.

If I read this correctly, this is Pascal wager in poetic form. That is, believing in God can only provide advantages: if God does not exist, then we unbelievers do not win anything, but if He does exist, then we lose everything, by landing forever in hell. Symmetrically for believers, of course.

If that were the case, then this poem would provide a rational justification to believe in God. Unfortunately, it doesn't. The problem is that if we consider the possibility of another different god X (with a similar punishement/reward system), then by substituting "God" with "X", we would have a rational justification to believe in X.

But we cannot have rational justifications to believe at the same time alternative versions of God, since they might contradict each other (belief in one might generate punishement if the other exists). Therefore, if follows logically, that this argument alone cannot be used to provide rational justification for belief in any god.

Ciao

- viole



But Viole, there is a major flaw in your argument. Christ is the only God, amongst the other "gods" to come and die for mankind. Your not going to find a God whom came down to take our place outside Christianity (at which I will add the only TRUE religion ;) ), all other religions ask for your life, all Christ asks for is your consideration and love. The other "gods" want your life.

#9
*Zion*

*Zion*

    Senior Member

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,865 posts



Here is a thought for non-believers to consider.


HOW HOPE MATTERS

Contemplating Judgment


If you walked on earth in heavenly hope

And was quite settled in your bliss;

What would it matter if death is the end

And you then left the world like this?


If you lived your days with faith in God's Son

And had peace and joy at the last;

Could it matter at all if hope should fail

And there's nothing when life is past?


If you disallow God, His love and truth

As the Bible truly does tell;

Should that matter now as you ponder life

If your end might sadly be hell?


If you miss heaven's joy and all that's good

And you find the Bible was true;

If you die so soon and know not God's Son,

What will it then matter to you?


- R. L. DeWitt, 7/04


Hi Seriousseeker,

First of all, happy new year!

As an unbeliever, I feel addressed and I am always interested in possible logical justifications to believe in Christianity. My initial post was too lazy from my side and has been correctly deleted, to avoid further misunderstandings.

If I read this correctly, this is Pascal wager in poetic form. That is, believing in God can only provide advantages: if God does not exist, then we unbelievers do not win anything, but if He does exist, then we lose everything, by landing forever in hell. Symmetrically for believers, of course.

If that were the case, then this poem would provide a rational justification to believe in God. Unfortunately, it doesn't. The problem is that if we consider the possibility of another different god X (with a similar punishement/reward system), then by substituting "God" with "X", we would have a rational justification to believe in X.

But we cannot have rational justifications to believe at the same time alternative versions of God, since they might contradict each other (belief in one might generate punishement if the other exists). Therefore, if follows logically, that this argument alone cannot be used to provide rational justification for belief in any god.

Ciao

- viole



But Viole, there is a major flaw in your argument. Christ is the only God, amongst the other "gods" to come and die for mankind. Your not going to find a God whom came down to take our place outside Christianity (at which I will add the only TRUE religion ;) ), all other religions ask for your life, all Christ asks for is your consideration and love. The other "gods" want your life.


Viole, it isn't about logic at all, it's about faith; and it's each person's decision to make. God bless you.

#10
Jayyycuuup

Jayyycuuup

    Senior Member

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,405 posts
I had what I was gonna post all written out, but this thread would likely be closed and that is not fair to the person whom made this thread. On top of that, WCF is not a platform to teach antisemitic theism, and I see that this is where it is likely to lead to.

God bless you

#11
joi

joi

    Royal Member

  • Royal Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,149 posts
Viole, were you not once a believer in Christ?

#12
shiloh357

shiloh357

    Royal Member

  • Royal Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 32,829 posts

If that were the case, then this poem would provide a rational justification to believe in God. Unfortunately, it doesn't. The problem is that if we consider the possibility of another different god X (with a similar punishement/reward system), then by substituting "God" with "X", we would have a rational justification to believe in X.

The problem with your statement is that it shows that you don't understand the differences between the claims of Christianity and other faiths. If you did, you could not make such an erroneous statement.

The biblical claims of Christianity are unique. They are unique enough that pascal's wager cannot be applied to any oher god or faith. You work from the erroneous assumption that all religions make the same basic claims but that is not true. When I say the biblical claims are unique, this is what i mean:

1. Christianity is rooted in a redemptive relationship with God. No other "religion" purports a relationship with it respective deity. In fact, not all "religions" have a deity, per se.

2. While Christianity and Islam share a belief in hell, there are some remarkable differences:
  • In the Bible, Hell was created for satan and his angels. Man was never meant to be the intended occupant of hell. In islam, hell is for unbelevers
  • In the Bible, trusting in Christ for salvation is the only means of averting having spend eternity in hell. In Islam, hell is averted by good works. In their theology, one's live is measured in the balance. Your good works have to outweigh your sinful works. If your good works don't outweigh your sin, you go to hell. You many have been a "good Muslim for 30 years, but if that is not enough to outweigh your prior sinfulness, you will go to hell no matter how goo you are. In Christianity, Jesus paid for our sin. He took the punishment on Himself on our behalf and offers mercy to us free of charge. Salvation in the Bible is not a reward for being good. It is a gift that God gives us out of His grace and mercy, even though we don't deserve it.
  • In Christianity is not about being good. God doesn't judge us on the basis of goodness, but on the basis of righteousness, that only comes through Christ.
  • In Islam, there is no way to know if you have been good enough or have done enough. In Christianity, those who trust in Christ are assured a place the Kingdom to come.
3. Pascal's wager works with Christianity because it is predicated on the exclusive claims that Christianity alone makes. The notion that alternative versions of God are equal in type and quality to what Christianity claims is a mistake on your part due to your relative ignorance of religions. In this case your "logic" fails because it is predicated on erroneous assumptions. It takes more than logic, viole. You actually have to have a correct understanding the topic and you actually have to correctly frame the position of those you oppose in order to have a coherent argument.

#13
*Zion*

*Zion*

    Senior Member

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,865 posts
I think that the poem's focus isn't really about justification of God, it's just asking the question: what if? what if we're wrong and God is right? what if He's provided the way to make us right? If we are wrong, what then?

#14
*Zion*

*Zion*

    Senior Member

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,865 posts
if I am wrong then i have lost something irreplaceable. the promises contained in the bible, which i believe are true, are worth more than just existence. what about you, what if you're wrong?

#15
*Zion*

*Zion*

    Senior Member

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,865 posts
you asked me about my loss, and i know more about than you do, seeing as it's mine personally. let me rephrase my question to you: what will it matter specifically to you if you should discover that you were wrong? you don't really have to answer, i understand what means to consider that, let alone make the answer known. but it would be interesting to know.

#16
*Zion*

*Zion*

    Senior Member

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,865 posts
wow, it seems i'm really bad at getting my question across. forget everybody else's interpretation. what would it matter to you where it really counts? but like i said before, if you don't really want to answer, don't feel you have to at all. it's just a poem, right?

#17
*Zion*

*Zion*

    Senior Member

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,865 posts
so what have you done in terms of personal investigation, rather than just going with what others are saying, (if that's what you been doing so far)?

#18
nickname

nickname
  • Nonbeliever
  • 52 posts


you asked me about my loss, and i know more about than you do, seeing as it's mine personally. let me rephrase my question to you: what will it matter specifically to you if you should discover that you were wrong? you don't really have to answer, i understand what means to consider that, let alone make the answer known. but it would be interesting to know.


I am not sure that what really matters to me is any relevant in case I am wrong.

But let us analyze the different cases, which depend on the various interpretations of Christianity. I make the ssumption here that I find out that I am wrong after my death.

1) Eternal separation from God. This is wishy-washy and underdefined. It is plausible that I would regret my erthly unbelief, assuming that not being separated from God provides some advantages. It is reasonable that I would be mad at my cogninitive faculties, anyways.

2) My consciousness will be terminated. Easy, I will not regret nor feel any emotion.

3) going to Heaven, anyway. Well, probably I would be really thankful and, at the same time, ashamed of my past unbelief. Actually, it depends, really. Could be that God appreciated my skepticism like I appreciate it when my kids do not believe me when I give them no evidence for my claims. In any case, my feelings will last no more than the first million years ;)

4) suffering all eternity in Hell. Well, probably I will suffer too much pain to think about it. And if I can think about it, then the pain is not so high. In the latter case, I would regret it, at least for the first couple thousands of years.

Ciao

- viole


In regards to the second item on the list, oblivion seems more likely. I was effectively 'dead' on more than one occasion before my heart started beating again. If there were an 'afterlife', I have no recollection of it. That, or the medics/machines were 'wrong'. As far as eternal suffering goes, logically, one should suffer in accordance with a lifetime of sins (a few decades, maybe, if 'thought crimes' are counted), so it's difficult to comprehend what purpose extending the punishment to forever would serve. Separation from God would be traumatizing for those close to him, but would not be very effective for anyone else, so I would agree with your reasoning to these options, and pascal's wager seems reasonable, as everyone is ultimately taking the same risk.

#19
Guest_ninhao_*

Guest_ninhao_*
  • Guests

Ok. Thinking about it, probably I would not be too hard on myself. After all I followed evidence, or the lack thereof.

Let me put it this way. If friend X tells me to invest all my money on a 50/50 lottery and friend Y tells me not to, my regret or happiness will be dependent on my choice and the result of the lottery. After all, when additional evidence about the success of my choices is lacking, it will all depend on whom I listen to. Should I listen to you, my muslim friend or my Hindu friend? And how should I base my choice, in lack of additional evidence? All of them are dead sure to hold the truth, so their fervor cannot be used, either. And why should I regret it, if I had no way to say who was right and who was wrong?

Ciao

- viole


Hello Viole,

Is it logical that denying the existence of any god would make it impossible, even absurd, to attempt to determine which god is the correct god?

:D

#20
Guest_ninhao_*

Guest_ninhao_*
  • Guests

Yes, of course, considering my current metaphysical position, it does not make any sense.

But my current position is the result of such thoughts, that is, it came afterwards. If I were a little green girl from Mars, with no cultural human heritage, and I listened to the various versions of God by interviewing Christians, Muslims, Hindu, etc. what criteria could I use to determine which one is more plausible?

Ciao

- viole


Unfortunately we have no way to form a comparison between this little green girl and you, or any other human, do we?

Every Human has lived and experienced the Earth inside this Earth’s system and, as example, even a pre Anglo settlement Australian Aborigine is confined to this system to make any evaluation of god.

I am wondering what the previous condition that your thoughts came after was.

It surely was upon this Earth. :D

Ok I thought of ending the tap dance. I think we have discussed the reasoning why every man and woman has had the opportunity to know the one true God. If the one true God has claimed He has made His presence known to us how is there any escape from this?




Worthy Christian Forums - Christian Message Boards - 1999-2014 part of the Worthy Network