I'm asking you to just tell me what the scientists say evolution is (I can tell you what creationists believe – can you grant me the courtesy of understanding the other side?
I already did, SEE Kerkut's "Documented/Cited" Definition I posted. And who cares what they say, it's what "scientists" can support/validate via the Scientific Method.
In all my interactions with you and other creationists I have never been provided that.
Baloney. Since you are the one "believing" it, why don't "You"-------Support It?
I only see a bunch of straw men – your last post being the latest - that get beat down by those that offer them.
Unsupported Assertion (Fallacy) x 2. Show this so-called "beat down"?
I'm looking for a creationist to be intellectually honest.
Baseless Generalized Assertion (Fallacy)
Are you gonna support your baseless assertions @ some point?
I say again....
DNA/RNA/"Functional Proteins" NEVER spontaneously form "naturally", outside already existing cells, from nucleotides and aminos, respectively.
It's Physically and Chemically IMPOSSIBLE.
That's just the Hardware!
1. Prove that the Genetic CODE is not....."CODE"/Software. OR....
2. Prove that Atoms/Molecules have Sentience and Intelligence.
These are Strawman to evolution as Hydrogen is Strawman to H2O
Thanks for your input.
No Problem, glad to be of assistance.