I've read archaeological papers before and I have found them quite useful in either in proving or disproving an argument in debate.
The last one I read was archaeological evidences that came out of Halley's Bible Handbook.
I read somewhere that when archaeologists descended on Israel and uncovered some valued sites, those sites were destroyed by the Muslims.
I would say that these guys are guilty of destruction to property. I am angry that these narrow-minded Islamic fanatics are being allowed to destroy sound evidences.
Why can't they just admit that they are wrong? Or maybe I am just deceiving myself, thinking that a bunch of crazy terrorists and islamic fanatics would dare
open their minds to the truth. It's sad. They are so narrow-minded.
Why would we give a bunch of fanatics leeway on this? They ought to be punished for being fanatics.
I have no idea why they did that. Unless it sort of challenged them and proved them wrong in some way.
It is embarassing that they would cover up evidence just to try to prove their own point.
It just furthers prove to me that they are wrong.
And it just shows bias.
Some people are just so stubborn that won't accept any new evidence that supposedly goes against one of their beliefs.
Edited by Skillet1, 10 September 2013 - 07:08 PM.