Because you have these nicely bulleted I'll make a note on each one hoping you all can see the coming grand deception.   1. Ezekiel 37:22 did not come to pass in 1948, it has still yet to come to pass, Israel is greatly divided now.     And Ezekiel 38:11 clearly does not describe the current state of Israel. 2. Likely an Islamic person will be set up to seem to be the anti-Christ to those not paying attention. War will break out concerning him, Christians being led to believe that he is the anti-Christ. That a conflict concerning Islam would happen was planned alongside the plan for ww1 and 2, all three wars were planned by the 'illuminati' and 'free masons'.  It is a demonic plan of deception leading to the beast and false prophet. 3. The real anti-Christ has a total of 70 years. 4. Likely during the war, a king will seem to be killed,     a king whose office was in existence since before Revelation was written.     Note Revelation 17:10 5. The manchild in Revelation 12 is clearly Christ, Christ said He saw satan fall like lightning, satan was cast down sometime during the initial time of Christ. 6. Likely during the coming war a king will seem to die and be healed from death. 7. That wounded/healed king then starts to declare things about 'outer-space' and how that Jesus will come and end the war      [ Revelation 13:6 ], and they build a temple to that coming 'Jesus'. 8.  The last captivity starts, last 70 year period of Israel in captivity, in the land and in the world. 9. Large armies gather and war continues, the world led to believe that the wounded/healed king is a martyr healed by angels from God, and that the world is fighting against the anti-Christ. 10. Supposed Jesus arrives, gloriously causing fire to come down on the armies of one whom the world was led to believe is the anti-Christ, most likely some Islamic person. "Jesus" destroys his forces with fire from the sky, and the world rejoices as the war finally ends.      

My mistake: I misinterpreted the thread's title and assumed it was a question for clarification. Exegesis is the critical interpretation (opinion) of a religious text, while hermeneutics is the method of my interpretation (opinion). Any subject discussed or scriptural evidence submitted is subject to opposing opinions and disagreement. The context of Daniel chapter nine is seventy weeks of years broken down and explained. I am a simpleton, so to be simple: And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate. (Daniel 9:27) He (man of sin, lawless one, Antichrist) and the verse above is where we derive a seven-year Tribulation. Matthew 24:15 and Mark 13:14 are the parallel passages (mid-tribulation). The seven-year Tribulation is also called “the Day of the Lord” in other prophetic passages that are too numerous to document. For then shall be great tribulation, such as was not since the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be. (Matthew 24:21) The time of Jacob's trouble (3.5 years), mentioned in Jeremiah 30:7, refers to a period of great distress for Judah and Israel but with the promise of salvation. This time is believed to be the Tribulation, a period of unparalleled suffering before Christ's return. The purpose is to bring Israel back to the Lord and fulfill His promises. Trying to describe the final week without mentioning the preceding 69 weeks, the present gap between the 69th and 70th week (church age—age of Grace), and the time of Jacob’s trouble would not mean much. My view of Daniel’s 70th-week sides with the premillennialist literal view, another meaningless opinion. Amillennialists have certain common features in their interpretation of Daniel 9:24–27. These include (a) the beginning of the seventy weeks was in 536 b.c. in the time of Cyrus, not (as premillennialists say) in 445 b.c. under Artaxerxes. This has the effect of allowing the seventy-sevens to be imprecise in duration. (b) The seventieth week is the entire Church Age, not a future seven-year period of Tribulation. These characteristic interpretations of amillennialism stem from not consistently practicing literal interpretation.[1]     [1] Ryrie, Charles Caldwell. Basic Theology: A Popular Systematic Guide to Understanding Biblical Truth. Moody Press, 1999, p. 519.

Yeah. I just wanted to be clear because the KJV, for all its excellence, didn't quite transmit the meaning. The subject of tis passgae in Philippians 3 is the same as 1st Thessalonians 4:13-17 - resurrection and rapture. Only, in Philippians the "OUT-resurrection" ("ex-anastasis") and the PRIZE of the firstfruit rapture must be ATTAINED TO. Paul, as he wrote that, had less than four years left to his martyrdom - and he wasn't convinced that he'd attained to it. Now that is a wake-up call!

Yes, but then its too late. But I know what you're getting at:

Don't expect anything from your flesh. It'll get exited about what is illegal. But maybe our lives are in a comfort zone and we don't want upheaval. The outer man is alive and well. The grand Type is Amalek. God has declared war "from generation to generation". Amalek was known because he attacked the aged, the sick and the weak stragglers. On Sunday at midday when you've just had a meaty Word and sung some of the old songs that edify, the flesh will be indifferent. On Friday after a hard week with little appreciation from your boss and your wife, the lingering eye contact with an eligible woman will have your flesh doing an Irish River Dance. Double vigilance when you're weak! Indifference to prophecy is OK when it doesn't apply to you. Guys want to bang heads over Daniel. But it is about "Daniel's People". Shall I lose my brother over something that does not concern me. Even the Fig Leaves can be viewed with a cold heart. It's Israel and their Law. But my attitude towards my brother when I expound is VERY important. "That evil servant" did it and lost the kingdom because his Master came as a thief (Matt.24). Now that moves me!