Jump to content

christian forums

Worthy Christian Forums - Christian Forums

Welcome to Worthy Christian Forums
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Photo

Adams transgression

* * * * * 1 votes

  • Please log in to reply
33 replies to this topic

#1
Edwin

Edwin

    Junior Member

  • Junior Member
  • PipPip
  • 144 posts

In what way is Adams transgression typical of what Jesus would do?

 

Rom 5:14 Yet death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over those whose sinning was not like the transgression of Adam, who was a type of the one who was

to come. 

 

Thank you.

 

Edwin.


  • 1

#2
Persuaded

Persuaded

    Junior Member

  • Junior Member
  • PipPip
  • 118 posts
  • Gender:Male
1 Tim 2:14
And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived, fell into transgression.

Adam *chose* to follow Eve into her exile from the garden, and by doing so she, through the promised "seed of the woman", was redeemed.
(That Adam's choice was a sin is an important, but separate issue!)

Likewise, Christ chose to follow us into sin (in a manner of speaking; He was made sin), so that we could be redeemed.
  • 1

#3
shiloh357

shiloh357

    Royal Member

  • Royal Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 32,483 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Israel Advocacy Bible Study, Apologetics, Theology, Camping, Hiking, Fishing, Birdwatching, BBQing

In what way is Adams transgression typical of what Jesus would do?

 

Rom 5:14 Yet death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over those whose sinning was not like the transgression of Adam, who was a type of the one who was

to come. 

 

Thank you.

 

Edwin.

Adam was not type of Christ in the transgression he committed.   He was a type of Christ in that just as Adam served as man's federal head in the Garden, Jesus was man's federal head on the cross.

 

When Adam sinned all of humanity was polluted by the sin nature inherited from Adam.   When Jesus was on the cross, he represented all of humanity and paid the price for Adam's sin on our behalf.


  • 1

#4
Edwin

Edwin

    Junior Member

  • Junior Member
  • PipPip
  • 144 posts

Thank you both for your comments.

 

My thinking is influenced somewhat by,

 

1Ti 2:14 Adam wasn't deceived, but the woman, being deceived, has fallen into disobedience; 
1Ti 2:15 but she will be saved through her child-bearing, if they continue in faith, love, and sanctification with sobriety.  Hebrew names version

 

Now here is a clue. What did Jesus do to save His bride

 

Every blessing..

 

Edwin.


  • 2

#5
shiloh357

shiloh357

    Royal Member

  • Royal Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 32,483 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Israel Advocacy Bible Study, Apologetics, Theology, Camping, Hiking, Fishing, Birdwatching, BBQing

Thank you both for your comments.

 

My thinking is influenced somewhat by,

 

1Ti 2:14 Adam wasn't deceived, but the woman, being deceived, has fallen into disobedience; 
1Ti 2:15 but she will be saved through her child-bearing, if they continue in faith, love, and sanctification with sobriety.  Hebrew names version

 

Now here is a clue. What did Jesus do to save His bride

 

Every blessing..

 

Edwin.

Jesus gave his life for His bride according to Ephesians 5.   What are you getting at?


  • 1

#6
Persuaded

Persuaded

    Junior Member

  • Junior Member
  • PipPip
  • 118 posts
  • Gender:Male
Indeed, Ephesian 5:25-32
Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church, and gave himself for it;
 
(I suggest Adam did this too. I'm not saying he acted with the same fore-knowledge as Christ, but he still chose to follow Eve into her exile from the garden, which then allowed her to have offspring, which then allowed her to be redeemed. Paul in other places says Adam is guilty of introducing sin into the world, but in a paradoxical way his sin allowed Eve's salvation.)
 
That he might sanctify and cleanse it with the washing of water by the word,
That he might present it to himself a glorious church, not having spot, or wrinkle, or any such thing; but that it should be holy and without blemish.
So ought men to love their wives as their own bodies. He that loveth his wife loveth himself.
For no man ever yet hated his own flesh; but nourisheth and cherisheth it, even as the Lord the church:
For we are members of his body, of his flesh, and of his bones.
For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and shall be joined unto his wife, and they two shall be one flesh.
This is a great mystery: but I speak concerning Christ and the church.
 
Paul is saying that human marriage is a model of the relationship of the Christ to the church. We see this evidenced in scripture in several places. Offhand:
Adam taking on sin to save Eve.
Boaz redeeming Naomi's land and taking a gentile bride in Ruth.
The Commandment "though shalt not commit adultery": note that adultery occurs in a marriage, whereas fornication is among the unmarried, and while wrong is not the subject of the commandment. God seems to have placed a special emphasis on unfaithfulness inside of marriage.
Unfaithfulness to God in Israel is referred to as a whoring wife throughout the OT, reinforcing the idiom of the marriage as a model of a right relationship to God.
Paul in other passages places special emphasis on those sins that are contrary to marriage, for example Rom 1:24-28.
 
I think 1 Tim 2:15 is a separate thought than v14 before it, but it is interesting to see them linked. Eve, by her childbearing, was able to be saved.

  • 2

#7
Edwin

Edwin

    Junior Member

  • Junior Member
  • PipPip
  • 144 posts

Thank you shiloh357 for your question.

 

You will recall I said "Now here is a clue. What did Jesus do to save His bride"

 

Answer.   2Cr 5:21 For our sake he made him to be sin who knew no sin, so that in him we might become the righteousness of God. 

 

"He who knew no sin permitted Himself to be made sin", in order to save His bride, you and I.

 

Adam who knew no sin permitted Himself to be made sin", in order to save His bride, Eve.

 

Remember, we are told than Adam was not deceived, he knew exactly what he was doing.

 

Bless you.

 

Edwin.


  • 2

#8
Reformed Baptist

Reformed Baptist

    Junior Member

  • Junior Member
  • PipPip
  • 154 posts
  • Gender:Male

 

Indeed, Ephesian 5:25-32
Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church, and gave himself for it;
 
(I suggest Adam did this too. I'm not saying he acted with the same fore-knowledge as Christ, but he still chose to follow Eve into her exile from the garden, which then allowed her to have offspring, which then allowed her to be redeemed. Paul in other places says Adam is guilty of introducing sin into the world, but in a paradoxical way his sin allowed Eve's salvation.)
 
 

I am sorry, but that is not what the Bible says! 

 

Gen 3:23-24 "Therefore the LORD God sent him out of the garden of Eden to till the ground from which he was taken. So He drove out the man; and He placed cherubim at the east of the garden of Eden, and a flaming sword which turned every way, to guard the way to the tree of life."
 
Adam didn't follow his wife into her exile, she followed him into his exile. In Romans 5 Adam is blamed for the sin, not women (in fact nowhere in scripture is Eve held responsible, though Paul makes in clear in 1 Tim 2 that she sinned first)

Edited by Reformed Baptist, 18 July 2014 - 12:55 PM.

  • 1

#9
Persuaded

Persuaded

    Junior Member

  • Junior Member
  • PipPip
  • 118 posts
  • Gender:Male

The "following" I'm referring to happened earlier, in Gen 3:6, when Adam chose to also eat the fruit. That is when Adam made a choice and was not deceived. Exile from the garden was the result of their sin. I guess in my mind the act of eating is equivalent to the exile, which is what's implied in Gen 2:17.

 

Or are you saying that Eve could have sinned, and not been exiled???

-that's not the significance I see in the him and man in v23-24; rather that he as the head of his family in a patriarchal setting was driven out, and therefore his family (Eve) with him.


  • 1

#10
other one

other one

    Royal Member

  • Royal Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 23,779 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oklahoma
  • Interests:camping computers

i don't believe the Bible says that Eve Sinned.....   it says she fell into transgression because she was quite deceived..

 

The Bible also states that Adam brought sin into the world....

 

Actually they brought the knowledge of sin into the world......    don't forget that they had been running around naked for some time until they ate of the fruit and realized they needed to cover themselves......    sin was there, but knowledge of it was not....

 

that's the reason I tell people that we are not guilty of anything Adam did for his sin is not passed onto us, but the ability to know of our own sin in our own lives.     Adam didn't make us all evil with that original sin talk.......    he gave us the ability to know better than to sin and there is no longer any excuse for our actions....


  • 1

#11
Persuaded

Persuaded

    Junior Member

  • Junior Member
  • PipPip
  • 118 posts
  • Gender:Male

You're using "transgression" so I'll assume you're referring to 1 Tim 2:14, quoted earlier.

 

So Eve didn't sin? A transgression isn't a sin? Several translations render this same word as sin or sinner. It's use throughout the rest of the NT is in relation to breaking the law, even used to refer to Adam's transgression. So if Adam sinned, so did Eve!

 

We aren't guilty of Adam's sin, but we have inherited his sin nature. Before sinning, they knew no sin. I think that is what is meant by the "knowledge of sin".

 

Nakedness was not a sin, but after sinning an awareness of their lack of righteousness (clothing is almost always scripturally linked to righteousness, here especially so) is what caused them to seek clothing. And it's instructive to note that this is the first act of religion- they tried through the works of their own hands to put on righteousness by sewing garmets of fig leaves, and God corrects them by making them coats of skins and thereby signifying that by the shedding of blood they would be covered.


  • 1

#12
other one

other one

    Royal Member

  • Royal Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 23,779 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oklahoma
  • Interests:camping computers

Eve did it from deception.....there is a difference...  Remember that Eve didn't hear God give them the directions as far as we know.   Appearantly Adam told her that if she touched the fruit she would die.....   The snake showed her that wasn't the case and talked her into eating the fruit.

 

Adam on the other hand knew exactly what God had told him and had no excuse as far as I can see, and it appears that God agreed and laid all the blame on him.


  • 2

#13
OakWood

OakWood

    Royal Member

  • Royal Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,457 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:South Coast, Great Britain
  • Interests:Archery, painting, plants and animals, Medieval history

Eve did it from deception.....there is a difference...  Remember that Eve didn't hear God give them the directions as far as we know.   Appearantly Adam told her that if she touched the fruit she would die.....   The snake showed her that wasn't the case and talked her into eating the fruit.

 

Adam on the other hand knew exactly what God had told him and had no excuse as far as I can see, and it appears that God agreed and laid all the blame on him.

 

So why did Eve receive extra punishment (pain during childbirth)?


  • 1

#14
other one

other one

    Royal Member

  • Royal Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 23,779 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oklahoma
  • Interests:camping computers

 

Eve did it from deception.....there is a difference...  Remember that Eve didn't hear God give them the directions as far as we know.   Appearantly Adam told her that if she touched the fruit she would die.....   The snake showed her that wasn't the case and talked her into eating the fruit.

 

Adam on the other hand knew exactly what God had told him and had no excuse as far as I can see, and it appears that God agreed and laid all the blame on him.

 

So why did Eve receive extra punishment (pain during childbirth)?

 

For giving Adam the fruit to eat.    She had already eaten of it and had to know that was wrong....


  • 1

#15
Reformed Baptist

Reformed Baptist

    Junior Member

  • Junior Member
  • PipPip
  • 154 posts
  • Gender:Male

The "following" I'm referring to happened earlier, in Gen 3:6, when Adam chose to also eat the fruit. That is when Adam made a choice and was not deceived. Exile from the garden was the result of their sin. I guess in my mind the act of eating is equivalent to the exile, which is what's implied in Gen 2:17.

 

No, Gen 2:17 does not imply exile, it expresses death. "but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat, for in the day that you eat of it you shall surely die." When Adam ate the fruit he wasn't subjecting himself to exile, he was subjecting himself to instant spiritual death (separation from God) that would result in his physical death (separation of body and soul) and unless he repented (eternal death of utter separation from God). This was no heroic act on his part of choosing to sacrifice himself for his wife as you seem to be presenting it, rather it was direct rebellion to the clear command that God had given him. 

 

Or are you saying that Eve could have sinned, and not been exiled???

-that's not the significance I see in the him and man in v23-24; rather that he as the head of his family in a patriarchal setting was driven out, and therefore his family (Eve) with him.

 

 

I think you need to look at the text again, it does not say that women (she wasn't called Eve till after the Garden!) went to find Adam to give him the fruit to it, it implies that he was with her when the serpent came - instead of stopping her, instead of correcting her misrepresentation of what God had said he not only allowed her to eat the fruit but ate it with her so no, Eve could not have sinned without Adam in that situation!  


  • 1

#16
Cog

Cog
  • Seeker
  • 71 posts
  • Gender:Male
Keep in mind who is head of who.
  • 1

#17
Reformed Baptist

Reformed Baptist

    Junior Member

  • Junior Member
  • PipPip
  • 154 posts
  • Gender:Male
i don't believe the Bible says that Eve Sinned.....   it says she fell into transgression because she was quite deceived..

 

 

What is transgression if it isn't sin? 

 

Eve did it from deception.....there is a difference...  Remember that Eve didn't hear God give them the directions as far as we know.   Appearantly Adam told her that if she touched the fruit she would die.....   The snake showed her that wasn't the case and talked her into eating the fruit.

 

 

 

I am not sure that argument works. We are not told if woman's misrepresentation's of God's command was her own or Adam's - all we know is she did misrepresentation the command. Beside's just because one is deceived does not absolve one of responsibility for one's actions does it? If I am deceived into thinking killing a person is a good thing, so I go ahead and kill him I can still expect to found guilty of a crime. 

 

Adam on the other hand knew exactly what God had told him and had no excuse as far as I can see, and it appears that God agreed and laid all the blame on him.

 

 

It is much more then that - Adam was responsible for woman and for the whole human race. this is key to whole gospel message, If God isn't dealing with humanity in Adam, he can't also deal with humanity in Christ 


  • 1

#18
other one

other one

    Royal Member

  • Royal Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 23,779 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oklahoma
  • Interests:camping computers

 


 

I am not sure that argument works. We are not told if woman's misrepresentation's of God's command was her own or Adam's - all we know is she did misrepresentation the command. Beside's just because one is deceived does not absolve one of responsibility for one's actions does it? If I am deceived into thinking killing a person is a good thing, so I go ahead and kill him I can still expect to found guilty of a crime. 

It's done in our court system quite often....   I'm not sure about Gods.

When Adam and Eve were running around naked did God hold that against them until they understood it was wrong.

 

Does God hold little kids accountable until they reach a point in their development that they understand......   or mentally ill people?

 

I don't really want to make that much of a deal out if it though, for I do believe that God really set the whole thing up so that Satan would be responsible for the humans to know good from evil so we could make a good jury for judging the angels.   I do not believe that God ever intended for us to live forever in these bodies... 


  • 1

#19
Edwin

Edwin

    Junior Member

  • Junior Member
  • PipPip
  • 144 posts

Let me now sum up this topic, and at the same time add some material, which I trust will be of help.
 
I have extracted it from my subject, "The fall of man, an alternative view."
 
At Rom 5:14, we are told that,  Adam, was a type of the one who was to come. 
 
We are also told at, 1Ti 2:14, that, Adam wasn't deceived,  he knows just what he is doing.
 
And then at, 1Ti 2:15 but she will be saved through her child-bearing.
 
Now how much childbearing had she done?, Non, can she fertilize herself? No. Only her husband can do that for her, but he is sinless, and perfect, and can have no contact with that which is sinful
 
Apart from Adam and Eve, the Human race has not yet been started, and if it isn't started then the kinsman redeemer cannot be born into it.
 
The only way in which mankind can be started, is if he becomes like her, a sinner, remember, he is not deceived, he knows just what he is doing.
 
Does he go to the tree as she had done. No he does not. He goes to her, and takes the fruit from her hand and partakes thereof. Symbolic of Jesus coming to us, and taking our sin to Himself.
 
May the Lord bless you, and keep you safe.
 
Edwin.


  • 2

#20
OneLight

OneLight

    Royal Member

  • Servant
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 26,087 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lebanon, New Hampshire
  • Interests:God, Family, Friends and Climbing

    I really enjoy discussing the Bible. There is so much to learn and so much to share.

    I am led to reach my hand out, in love, to those in need.

Let me now sum up this topic, and at the same time add some material, which I trust will be of help.
 
I have extracted it from my subject, "The fall of man, an alternative view."
 
At Rom 5:14, we are told that,  Adam, was a type of the one who was to come. 
 
We are also told at, 1Ti 2:14, that, Adam wasn't deceived,  he knows just what he is doing.
 
And then at, 1Ti 2:15 but she will be saved through her child-bearing.
 
Now how much childbearing had she done?, Non, can she fertilize herself? No. Only her husband can do that for her, but he is sinless, and perfect, and can have no contact with that which is sinful
 
Apart from Adam and Eve, the Human race has not yet been started, and if it isn't started then the kinsman redeemer cannot be born into it.
 
The only way in which mankind can be started, is if he becomes like her, a sinner, remember, he is not deceived, he knows just what he is doing.
 
Does he go to the tree as she had done. No he does not. He goes to her, and takes the fruit from her hand and partakes thereof. Symbolic of Jesus coming to us, and taking our sin to Himself.
 
May the Lord bless you, and keep you safe.
 
Edwin.


So I am clear with what you are posting, are you saying that Adam was sinless? That his direct disobedience to Gods command to him is not a sin?
  • 1




0 user(s) are browsing this forum

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Worthy Christian Forums - Christian Message Boards - 1999-2014 part of the Worthy Network