Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates     

  1. Past hour
  2. Pope

    What evidence do you have. Yes there are parts of catholic church that had doctrine that I disagree. But to say they keep people from heaven you go over board. Without the Catholic church there's no protestant church.
  3. The Almanac of The Prophets of Israel

    2 Corinthians 3:12-18New International Version (NIV) 12 Therefore, since we have such a hope, we are very bold. 13 We are not like Moses, who would put a veil over his face to prevent the Israelites from seeing the end of what was passing away. 14 But their minds were made dull, for to this day the same veil remains when the old covenantis read. It has not been removed, because only in Christ is it taken away. 15 Even to this day when Moses is read, a veil covers their hearts.16 But whenever anyone turns to the Lord, the veil is taken away. 17 Now the Lord is the Spirit, and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is freedom. 18 And we all, who with unveiled faces contemplate[a] the Lord’s glory, are being transformed into his image with ever-increasing glory, which comes from the Lord, who is the Spirit.
  4. The Almanac of The Prophets of Israel

    An apocalypse (Ancient Greek: ἀποκάλυψις apokálypsis, from ἀπό and καλύπτω meaning "uncovering"), translated literally from Greek, is a disclosure of knowledge, i.e., a lifting of the veil or revelation. In religious contexts it is usually a disclosure of something hidden, “a vision of heavenly secrets that can make sense of earthly realities". Bart D. Ehrman, "How Jesus Became God", pg. 59, ISBN 978-0-06-177818-6
  5. Resurrection

    Yo can even see an example in the feast days, that would point to a first day of the week resurrection, there were feasts on the first day of the week.
  6. Is it just me .... the legacy continues ...

    Hold that thought for a sec, i aint wishing upon nooby or nobody i was merely extending a hand, but since you took off with your banana boat, i shall do the banana split to last. 😂
  7. It really is pretty basic.... who Yeshua is. And JW's drop the ball on that one right out of the gate. Now these next few verses seem to refer to Yehovah and most JW's would agree... Isaiah 41:4 (NKJV) Who has performed and done it, Calling the generations from the beginning? ‘I, the Lord, am the first; And with the last I am He.’ Isaiah 44:6 (NKJV) “Thus says the Lord, the King of Israel, And his Redeemer, the Lord of hosts: ‘I am the First and I am the Last; Besides Me there is no God. Isaiah 48:12 (NKJV) “Listen to Me, O Jacob, And Israel, My called: I am He, I am the First, I am also the Last. Pretty straight forward. Very consistent. Now we go to the book of the Revelation, which these same folks have a affinity for. Revelation 22:13 (NKJV) I am the Alpha and the Omega, the Beginning and the End, the First and the Last. That seems to follow the same pattern we saw in Isaiah. But we come to this one......... Revelation 2:8 (NKJV) “And to the angel of the church in Smyrna write, ‘These things says the First and the Last, who was dead, and came to life: Even from their own New World Translation..... Rev 2:8 “And to the angel of the congregation in Smyrʹna write: These are the things that he says, ‘the First and the Last, who became dead and came to life again: Now that was written as a direct quote of Yeshua. Yeshua is claiming to be the pre-existent, eternal Yehovah! The same Yehovah of Isaiah. Yet, JW's do not agree with their own scripture as they claim that Yeshua is actually the archangel Michael. If one cannot get this basic concept right, which is the foundation stone to build upon, then every other theological concept fails.
  8. False doctrine

    Since you unwilling to present the law. Ill do so.... Numbers 28:10 This is the burnt offering for every Sabbath, in addition to the regular burnt offering and its drink offering Since all the burnt offerings pointed to Christ and the priesthood changed, i dont need to offer burnt offerings based on levitical preisthood on the sabbath as Christ is my burnt offering based on the priesthood of Melchizedek for the sabbath. Hence his role the Lord of the Sabbath. The law stay the same
  9. False doctrine

    There are obviously two camps one that will speak out against the false doctrines and the other that will attack those who do. It has always been this way.
  10. Resurrection

    A number of historical inaccuracies and half-truths here... 1) The pagan Roman Empire didn't have a weekly rest day on any day of the week. Only the Jews, who observed the Sabbath, had a day of rest. 2) Constantine did indeed make Sunday rest compulsory, but that was to bring everyone else in line with the Church - which had been observing Sunday as a day of worship for over a century! 3) There was no 'Pope' in the 4th century. The bishop of Rome was one of three senior bishops, but he didn't have the absolute authority that we associate with the Papacy. In summary, this article is highly misleading. Sunday rest was not invented either by pagans or by the Pope, but was a very early church tradition (it's still possible to argue over whether the early church was right or wrong, but don't blame the Pope!) In fact, if you read the article carefully, it contradicts itself! "At that time, Sunday was the rest day of the Roman Empire, whose religion was Mithraism, a form of sun worship." "Constantine Made Sunday a Civil Rest Day" If Sunday was already a civil rest day, Constantine didn't need to make it so!
  11. False doctrine

    Thanks, I'm not surprised at all with your comment.
  12. Iridium and the K-T Boundary Layer

    I wrote this in response at your request, Tristen. Here is your quote below: Which “explanations from physics, chemistry, astronomy, geology, paleontology, and biology” have you provided that I have not been able to rationally address from a creationist perspective? Every time I try to engage on the actual facts, you tell me you're not an expert and point me to another resource to argue the case for you. So I question the standard by which you consider these “explanations” to be “more likely”, given your current reluctance to examine the facts for yourself. It is unfair to ask someone to provide something and then drop a "snark-bomb" on it when it is provided. Did you get it out of your system, or is this going to represent our dialogue henceforward?
  13. False doctrine

    Spot on! that type of a reaction has violence in it.
  14. False doctrine

    Again yor opinion are not scriptual rebuttals. Show me the law. 1
  15. False doctrine

    I don't need to. You confirmed what I already suspected. You don't really observe the Sabbath; it is all talk.
  16. Trick or treating

    Agreed. Many kids in my area dress up as as video game or cartoon characters. For the kids, it's generally a harmless and fun activity.
  17. False doctrine

    Show me the law
  18. False doctrine

    I never said they were.
  19. Trick or treating

    I agree completely
  20. False doctrine

    I dont think so, I wish to be shown how are they such a burden?
  21. False doctrine

    So you don't really obey the law that God gave in Scripture, right?
  22. Trick or treating

    I have to break with the crowd. I really don't see anything wrong with trick or treating. I did it from age 6 to age 10 and no one I knew who did it every fell into the occult or witchcraft or whatever. I don't personally know of anyone who ever turned to demons or anything because of Halloween. If dressing up and going to a party or going trick or treating is all it takes to send someone over the edge, and go headlong into the occult, they had problems going on before Oct. 31.
  23. False doctrine

    Th priesthood changed and therefore its ceremonial however the law is still intact im still to present an offering ....being me The sabbath is still in tact.
  1. Load more activity
×