Jump to content

Da Servant

Junior Member
  • Content Count

    108
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Da Servant

  1. Peace be to you, Jello5, from God the Father and the Lord Jesus Christ. I once met a man who said the same things you are saying: I used to go to church, I used to believe in God but now I don't, etc... With respect, I think you never put your faith in Jesus Christ, got lead into believing you did, and are being tormented with the thought of never being able to get back into the relationship with God you thought you had. Take heart, the Lord hears your prayers, and he is moving on your behalf. Concerning the hatred of Christians toward atheists, genuine hatred, it may be because they have never been properly trained on how to handle persons of different beliefs. This was certainly true with me. I was taken to church, expected to hear the preacher, believe on the Lord Jesus, and all my problems would be solved. Problem is, my father, mother, grandfather, grandmother, aunts, uncles, cousins, etc.. never took the time to talk about the things of God with me. When I was a little boy, I watched pornography with my dad, one of his sisters, and her husband. I was never taught that sexual intercourse before marriage was a bad thing. I was never told "Don't pray to Satan" (which thing I've done). Many other things I was never told, most of the wisdom I have in the Scriptures I have had to get it on my own (with the obvious help of the Holy Ghost). Concerning your girlfriend, the love you have for one another is not an evil thing, far from it. But the Scriptures do say that believers and unbelievers should not marry because it would damage the believer's faith. This may be why she won't be with you, even though she still does. Concerning morals, I have known unbelievers to be more righteous than many Christians. Concerning atheists, it seems to me that they do not want the accountability that comes with believing in God. They, like many people including Christians, like to think that they are the God of their own world. It is true to a great degree that we control our eternal outcome. When God created us he gave us authority over our own lives, to do with them as we please. What went wrong in the garden of Eden was that we decided we wanted to be Gods just like the LORD. Another reason why most people don't like believing in God is because they think all God does is tell them what to do or he will cast them into Hell. This is not true. Three things we all need to understand -- 1) True: God tells us what to do and think; 2) True: God tells us why we should think it; 3) True: God tells us that the choice of whether or not to obey his is ours. In his love for us, he told us that some actions are good, that some actions are bad, and there are consequences to our actions (results of our actions, if you prefer). That people should die and go to Heaven or Hell is the result of the choices that we make. God loves you. He does not want to see you end up in Hell. It would break his heart. Perhaps after reading this, you will believe in the God of the Bible and give his a chance by believing on the only Lord God that bought you (the Lord Jesus took God's wrath for you if you will receive it). Jesus Christ paid the price for your sins and is waiting to receive you as his own (you become his brother should you believe on him unto salvation). It won't be easy all the time and there are a lot of fakes in the churches, including some big name fakes, but it is worth it. If you believe on him, the Lord Jesus said that he would never leave you nor forsake you. This means that when you are going through hard times, he is going through them with you. When you go through heartache, his heart aches with yours. Whatever you do, DO NOT BELIEVE ON THE LORD JESUS CHRIST SO THAT YOU CAN GET YOUR GIRLFRIEND! You would only heap damnation upon yourself. This is one time he will not honor your decision to follow him. Your friend, Marshall.
  2. The season is what the Lord meant, Heb 13:8; however, a winter storm of hatred (dealing very coldly with those fleeing Antichrist) should also be expected. Great question!
  3. I pray for their salvation and that you may be comforted concerning this. I think it is important to remember that we cannot save anyone. "I have planted, Apollos watered; but God gave the increase. So then neither is he that planteth any thing, neither he that watereth; but God that giveth the increase." 1 Corinthians3:6, 7 Our job is to pray and minister the word of God as we are able, not save them. Besides, they still have to make the choice themselves. If they die and go to Hell, the failure is theirs, not yours.
  4. Perhaps this is why the men in your family are drawn to such women, Saved.One.by.Grace: The Lord drew the men of your family to them so that you could serve as an anchor of stability to them, to help them in their walk with God.
  5. David will be broadcasting it on Roku. Here's the address: https://channelstore.roku.com/details/178366/david-heavener-tv
  6. David said that filming is planned for early 2018. He is looking for assistance in these areas: Public Relations, Marketing, Fundraising, Graphic Design, Copy Writing, Video Editing, Publicity & Promotions, Social Media If you wish, or know someone who wishes to assist, please contact David at David@Davidheavener.com or TheLastEvangelistSeries@gmail.com. Prayer requests also being accepted at TheLastEvangelistSeries@gmail.com
  7. I'm not certain, but hopefully by the end of this year.
  8. By: Marshall Ramsey II HOLLYWOOD, California -- A new television series is coming out, one that threatens the "safety" of Hollywood politics. "The Last Evangelist" is a show produced by David Heavener, "an award-winning filmmaker and actor producing and distributing hundreds of features for HBO, Showtime, USA and others worldwide." A Bible-believing Christian, as well as one who believes that we are living in the "last days", that is, the time immediately preceding the return of the Lord Jesus Christ to earth, David was dissatisfied with the Hollywood machine and set out to do something different. "When I made movies in the past, it was kind of like a formula," says David. "It was a way of doing things. But now I'm realizing the formula is different, the way of doing things is different, because I'm totally dependent upon God." David is no stranger to making movies. He has written, produced, and directed more than 20 movies, including 'Outlaw Prophet' and 'Angel Blade' and has worked with some of the biggest stars in Hollywood including Martin Landau, Margot Kidder, and Marc Singer. Concerning the timing of production on the series, David said he gets frustrated because of how God wants him to do things, but is trusting God with the outcome. "David, I want you to wait on me. I am going to send the right people to you," said God. "Every actor in this TV series will be sent by me for a purpose and a time." "It's really difficult right now, because I can't just go out and cast anybody I want," says David. "I'm praying to God for each and every part in this series, because what happens if someone gets on the set and they're sent by Satan and they sabotage the whole project?" The opposition to the project is already manifesting, both from within Hollywood and Christianity. In an e-mail dated June 6, 2017, David discusses some of the personal losses he has experienced due to his work on 'The Last Evangelist'. "I've lost a good friend, an acting gig and a theatrical agent because I'm taking a hard stand against political correctness and spiritual deception in these end times." In another e-mail dated August 14, 2017, David relates some of the things people have told him, all before production on the show has even started. "Since I announced The Last Evangelist series and what it's about, a few of my film industry buddies have cautioned me, “Stop speaking out against Hollywood – you’ll lose acting jobs!” "I’ve been warned by some well-intended clergy, “Don’t let the series take such a harsh stand against organized religion.” All this and we haven't even started filming yet!" David is very specific in how he categorizes the Hollywood way of doing things. "'I find it bizarre that they tell me to take the "high road," says David. "High road? Are you kidding me? The Hollywood system and the counterfeit religious system are not high roads at all. They are highways to hell. " A full catalog of e-mail newsletters from David can be found here: http://us9.campaign-archive2.com/home/?u=e4716c510a431688243e6b79a&id=86dc02b7f2 Clearly, 'The Last Evangelist' is aimed at the heart of Hollywood and the churches in these last days and is certain to cause controversy. May God protect this show and the people involved with it. imdb.com and https://www.davidheavener.com/last-evangelist/ contributed to this article
  9. Dress Designer Closing Shop Doubles As Message From The Lord By: Marshall Ramsey II, Worthy News U.S. Correspondent SAINT GEORGE, South Carolina (WorthyNews) -- Today on Channel 4 News an announcement was made regarding the shutting down of dress maker Alfred Angelo. Mr. Angelo designed wedding gowns and bridesmaid dresses for women across the country. His future seemed secure along with the purchases of the dresses he had already made, or so it seemed. The company made a "last minute" announcement that it was shutting its doors and going into bankruptcy. This sent brides and bridesmaids scrambling to get their orders. One woman was even seen running into a bridal shop, presumably to make sure she could get her order. It seems that the orders already placed may not be filled because of potential bankruptcy proceedings. All inquiries are being directed to a lawyer. This unfortunate turn of events, though, serves as a warning to the churches. As some may know, the time of the Lord's return is near. Preceding this is the Rapture and the Tribulation period, also called the time of Jacob's trouble. Mr. Angelo closing his doors suddenly takes on special meaning, especially with the parable of the ten virgins: "And at midnight there was a cry made, Behold, the bridegroom cometh, go ye out to meet him. Then all those virgins arose, and trimmed their lamps. And the foolish said unto the wise, Give us of your oil, for our lamps are gone out. But the wise answered, saying, Not so, lest there be not enough for us and you, but go ye rather to them that sell, and buy for your selves. And while they went to buy, the bridegroom came, and they that were ready, went in with him tot he marriage, and the door was shut. Afterward came also the other virgins, saying, Lord, Lord, open to us. But he answered, and said, Verily I say unto you, I know you not." This is what the Lord is saying to the churches: "Time is almost up. You that sleep because you are lazy, thinking yourself some great one, this is your last chance to be counted worthy to escape the coming judgment. You say that you know me. I ask you now: 'Do I know you?' I'm not sure. "To you that sleep because of exhaustion from working for my Father, I tell you this: "Keep up the good work. Keep fighting the good fight. Your troubles in this world are almost over. Continue to keep yourselves ready. Your eternal rewards await you." Behold, the Bridegroom cometh, go ye out to meet him.
  10. By: Marshall Ramsey II, Worthy News U.S. Correspondent WASHINGTON, D.C. -- (WorthyNews) On January 5, 2016, President Obama announced new gun control measures that are being put into effect that are supposed to help reduce gun violence, especially mass shootings. What you may not realize is that as part of his effort to "reduce gun violence" he is quietly asserting that American citizens who are gun owners are to be denied their citizenship. In paragraph 17 of his speech, President Obama makes a distinction between gun owners and American citizens. While the average person will dismiss this as simply a slip of the tongue, it reflects the attitude of President Obama in this speech, that Americans should not be able to own guns. So we’ve created a system in which dangerous people are allowed to play by a different set of rules than a responsible gun owner who buys his or her gun the right way and subjects themselves to a background check. That doesn’t make sense. Everybody should have to abide by the same rules. Most Americans and gun owners agree. And that’s what we tried to change three years ago, after 26 Americans -– including 20 children -– were murdered at Sandy Hook Elementary. (Bold type and italics mine.) Notice how he makes a distinction between American citizens and gun owners? Again, in paragraph 12 of the same speech, he attempts to deny Americans the right to gun ownership by saying that the Constitution of the United States of America only guarantees its citizens the right to bear arms. Here is a copy of paragraph 12: Now, I want to be absolutely clear at the start -- and I’ve said this over and over again, this also becomes routine, there is a ritual about this whole thing that I have to do -- I believe in the Second Amendment. It’s there written on the paper. It guarantees a right to bear arms. No matter how many times people try to twist my words around -- I taught constitutional law, I know a little about this -- (applause) -- I get it. But I also believe that we can find ways to reduce gun violence consistent with the Second Amendment. As you can see in the highlighted section, (highlighted and italicized by me), President Obama is directly saying that Americans do not have the right to own guns, a.k.a. keep arms. Here is what the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution says: A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. (Bold type mine.) All this, however, is just another step toward the total disarmament of the American people. In the 1990's, when President Obama was a professor at the University of Chicago Law School, he stated to John Lott, Jr., that "I don't think people should be able to own guns." While this may not be an attempt to ban private ownership of firearms, it certainly testifies to President Obama's thoughts then and actions now. What about our military? If President Obama wanted to ban ownership of guns, wouldn't he take away their guns as well? Perhaps; however, President Obama knows that he needs military protection in case we ever rise up against him and that he cannot count on it from foreign countries. President Obama is a clear and present danger to the rights of American citizens, including their lives. His actions are treasonous and it is the duty of Christians everywhere to humble themselves before God, seeking his forgiveness of their sins, and supplicating him for the removal of President Obama from power, and the healing of this land. Of that there can be no doubt. Source articles: https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2016/01/05/remarks-president-common-sense-gun-safety-reform?utm_source=email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=email544-text1&utm_campaign=guns https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution http://www.cnsnews.com/blog/gregory-gwyn-williams-jr/author-quotes-then-professor-obama-saying-i-dont-believe-people-should
  11. By: Marshall Ramsey II, Worthy News US Correspondent LAS VEGAS, NV (WorthyNews) -- For years there has been speculation on who killed rapper Tupac Shakur. Now, it seems that the mystery may have been solved. In a recent interview with www.independent.co.uk, retired Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department sergeant Chris Carroll discussed his connection to the murder of the rap star. He is the one who opened the door of the vehicle that Tupac was driving at the time of the incident. "I finally get the car door to open, and as I pull it open, the guy inside came right out, like he was leaning against the door. "And at first I thought the guy was going to bust out of the door right on top of me; I thought this was his plan of attack, so to speak. But then I notice that he's not coming out of the door; he was falling out of it." To the casual reader, this sounds like then Officer Carroll was doing nothing more than checking out what appeared to be a bad situation. However, in the same interview, Mr. Carroll makes some incriminating remarks that casts himself in a very bad light. "There's something in police work called the 'dying declaration', a legal concept that, in a nutshell, basically says that if someone who believes they're going to die gives out the name of a suspect or is able to explain what happened, that's not considered hearsay in court when they're not there to testify; it's admissible evidence," he explained. "He went from fighting to 'I can't do it.' And when he made that transition, he looked at me, and he's looking right in my eyes. And that's when I looked at him and said one more time, 'Who shot you?' "He looked at mean he took a breath to get the words out, and he opened his mouth, and I thought I was actually going to get some cooperation. And then the words came out: 'F**k you.' If I had been shot and a police officer asked me who shot me, I wouldn't have told him 'F**k you.' If at all able, I would have told the officer the name of the person or persons who shot me. What appear to be Tupac Shakur's final words before he died sound more like the words I might say to the person who shot me and is asking me the question in a mocking fashion. Furthermore, if Officer Carroll had seen Tupac fall out of the car as he claimed, and I believe he did, Tupac would not have been fighting against him, but rather trying to get him to help him if he did not do anything to him. It sounds as though that just before Tupac slipped out of consciousness, then Officer Carroll was taunting him, asking him who shot him the whole time knowing that he [Officer Carroll] was the one that pulled the trigger. No, Chris Carroll was not there to help Tupac Shakur that night, but rather was there to kill him and Tupac was able to identify him with Officer Carroll's testimony and his own dying words. Source article: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/tupac-shakur-death-last-words-of-the-rapper-revealed-18-years-after-his-murder-9424622.html
  12. By: Marshall Ramsey II, Worthy News U.S. Correspondent Source article: http://news.yahoo.com/4-million-gold-stolen-truck-north-carolina-171614803.html $4.8M in gold bars stolen in armored truck heist on highway By MICHAEL BIESECKER RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) -- Shortly after dusk along a lonely stretch of Interstate 95, armed robbers hijacked an armored truck, tied up the two guards and disappeared into the night with 275 pounds of gold bars. The guards working for Transvalue Inc. of Miami reported pulling off to the side of the interstate about 6:30 p.m. Sunday after their vehicle began having mechanical problems in eastern North Carolina, according to the Wilson County Sheriff's Office. The guards told police they were surprised by three armed men driving a white van who ordered the guards to lie on the ground, tied their hands behind their backs and then marched them into nearby woods. (If this were a real surprise heist, the thieves wouldn't have marched the guards into the woods. If this happened, it would have been to kill the guards, which would imply that the guards were known to their assailants. The fact that the guards were handcuffed, marched into the woods, and managed to not get shot suggests that the guards knew their supposed assailants and conspired with them to steal the gold.) The robbers then helped themselves to barrels filled with about $4.8 million in gold before making their getaway. Transvalue said its employees were not injured during the heist. Transvalue chief executive officer Jay Rodriguez said the truck carrying the gold bars left Miami about 4 a.m. Sunday. The load was headed to Attleboro, Massachusetts, a town south of Boston nicknamed "Jewelry City" for the large number of manufacturers based there. "At this time we are working with the authorities to try and resolve this matter," Rodrigez said. "We are offering a $50,000 reward for any information leading to the arrest of these criminals." Though Interstate 95 is one of the busiest roads on the East Coast, the rural stretch where the robbery occurred is relatively isolated, bordered by trees and farms. (It seems more than mere coincidence that the mechanical troubles happened on an isolated section of I-95. While it is possible that there were legitimate mechanical problems and that they happened at that particular spot, given the fact that the guards knew the robbers, it seems more likely that the guards lied about the mechanical problems, which were miraculously fixed locally, even with a receipt for the repairs.) Wilson County Sheriff Calvin Woodard Jr. declined interview requests Monday and did not respond to messages from The Associated Press seeking additional information, such as what weapons the robbers used or how they managed to get the armored truck open. No detailed description of the suspects or their vehicle was released. (Declining interview requests is one thing, but not releasing any identifying information is another. No description of the weapons the robbers used, how they managed to get the armored truck open, no description of the suspects or the vehicles released? The reason Sheriff Woodard is not releasing this information, and refusing to give interviews on this, is that he helped plan and execute the robbery. It appears that the guards involved were previously connected to Sheriff Woodard and contacted him regarding the shipment, at which point Sheriff Woodard, who would have been familiar with the area or scouted it out, suggested the particular location, and perhaps got a local mechanic to forge a repair bill to help cover their tracks.) Shelley Lynch, spokeswoman for the Federal Bureau of Investigation's Charlotte field office, said agents are assisting the local sheriff and are working to determine whether a federal crime has been committed. According to its website, Transvalue specialized in transporting cash, precious metals, gems and jewelry in armored trucks. The company says its shipments are insured for up to $100 million. (IF a federal crime has been committed? The theft of $4.8 million in gold is a major theft. According to information at http://www.sg-llp.com/federal-resources-crimes.php, major thefts include the stealing of art, jewelry, and gems. Not only is this a major theft, and a federal crime, it appears to have been planned specifically to announce that it is a federal crime, which indicates that one or more members of the United States government are behind it. While Miss Lynch appears to be involved, it does not appear that she headed up the heist. It appears as though one or more of our elected officials are behind it, as incredible as it may seem.)
  13. I think it is a misuse of the word. The word Nimrod in Hebrew means 'he rebelled' or 'rebel'. The application of the 'fool' usage to Nimrod is appropriate, though.
  14. By: Marshall Ramsey II, Worthy News U.S. Correspondent UR, Iraq (WorthyNews) -- A pair of figurines nearly 4,000 years old were discovered by Sir Leonard Wooley in 1929 that are linked to the biblical patriarch Abraham. Called "Ram In A Thicket," the 16.5 inch figurine (which some say looks more like a goat) is made from gold, silver, copper, lapis lazuli, red limestone, and bits of shell. (The figurines as they can be seen today.) The full story can be see here: http://biblefactoids.blogspot.com/2014/11/artifacts-made-by-abraham-found-in-iraq.html
  15. By: Marshall Ramsey II HEBRON, Israel -- At the city of Hebron, in the western and southern sections of Tel Hebron near Tel Rumeida, remains of an Israelite settlement from the Second Temple period have been found and opened to visitors. The remains were found outside a Middle Bronze Age wall that had been previously found. An olive oil press, cisterns, a workshop with a furnace and ponds are among the artifacts found in an industrial area. Also found was a road that leads to the city square and center of the town, however that section hasn't been excavated yet. What is even more amazing than that is an overlooked article from the First Temple period around roughly 1,000 B.C. A stamp with the words "King of Hebron" on it in the agricultural area. The only Israelite king ever to reign from Hebron is David. David was the second king of Israel, after Saul the son of Kish. After David was chosen by God to be king, David had to flee from Saul. For a period of seven and 1/2 years, David reigned over Hebron (2 Sam. 2:1). What appears to have happened is that while David was at Hebron, he was visiting this olive press site and lost his stamp that he used to seal official documents. It appears to have remained buried for more than 3,000 years until its find in 2014. The doubters of David's existence have a truly mighty stone of stumbling to contend with. Source article: http://www.jewishpress.com/news/breaking-news/new-discoveries-in-ancient-jewish-settlement-uncovered-in-hebron/2014/06/06/
  16. By: Marshall Ramsey II, Worthy News U.S. Correspondent MOSCOW, Russia -- (WorthyNews) Edward Snowden is the man of the hour. Love him, hate him, it doesn't matter. He clearly has center stage after his interview on NBC's Nightly News with Brian Williams. Edward Snowden is the man accused by the NSA of leaking classified government secrets to the public. But what else do we know about him? Edward Joseph Snowden was born June 21, 1983 to Lonnie and Wendy Snowden in Elizabeth City, North Carolina. Lonnie was a member of the United States Coast Guard and his mother is currently a clerk at the United States District Court in Maryland. He went to high school at Arundel High School in Anne Arundel County, MD until he dropped out in his sophomore year. After getting his GED, he attended Anne Arundel Community College, where, according to ABC News, he didn't take any cyber security or computer science classes. According to news reports and, I believe, statements from the government Edward Snowden never had contact with the NSA until 2004 or 2005. However, Edward Snowden himself says that he has had contact with the NSA, especially on September 11, 2001, the date of the infamous World Trade Center attack in New York. In his interview with Brian Williams, Brian Williams asks Edward Snowden if he took patriotism seriously. Mr. Snowden replied that he was on Fort Meade on the day of the attacks, that he could remember the tension of that day, and that he took patriotism very seriously. I did some checking and discovered that Fort Meade refers to Fort George G. Meade in Maryland. It was named after George G. Meade, a major general in the Union Army during the Civil War who received the nickname "Old Snapping Turtle." Fort Meade is also the headquarters for the United States Cyber Command, the National Security Agency (NSA), the Defense Courier Service, and Defense Information Systems Agency headquarters. I looked up NSA youth programs, thinking there might be a connection. The NSA does have a internship programs for college students. While I cannot confirm that Edward Snowden was enrolled in one of these programs, it does lend considerable weight to Mr. Snowden's assertions that he was there. It also debuffs media reports that Mr. Snowden did not have any contact with the NSA until 2004/2005. Edward Snowden would have been 19 at the time of the September 11 attacks. Source and related articles: http://time.com/134428/snowden-id-like-to-go-home/ http://time.com/137530/nsa-to-release-snowden-email/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Snowden http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/timeline-edward-snowdens-life/story?id=19394487 http://www.nsa.gov/careers/opportunities_4_u/students/index.shtml http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fort_George_G._Meade en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Meade
  17. By: Marshall Ramsey II, Worthy News U.S. Correspondent WASHINGTON, D.C. -- (WorthyNews) In an article put out by the Associated Press on Tuesday, May 13, 2014, closed door meetings between the rich and influential and our elected officials were discussed with vague references to what goes on inside them. After some investigation into the story, I've been able to piece together what is actually going on inside these meetings. Below is a copy of the story (in bold print) along with what I discovered (in italics). For a few days in March, the American Enterprise Institute welcomed scores of business and political leaders to a private annual meeting at a resort on the Georgia coast. But only those who attended know what issues were discussed, strategy planned or promises made. Private means only certain people are wanted to be there. The above paragraph mentions political leaders. This suggests that this private meeting is an attempt on behalf of business leaders (they were invited also) to unduly persuade, i.e. bribe, political officials to make laws to fit their desires. It also suggests an active participation in criminal activity on the part of the American Enterprise Institute as they hosted the event. The goal of all business is to make money; thus it stands to reason that if business leaders and political leaders, some of which will be named below; if business leaders and political leaders are meeting in an exclusive environment, with participation in the event dependent upon one not talking about what went on, then it stands to reason that criminal activity is taking place, specifically bribery. That only those in attendance know what was discussed is disturbing. It prevents the general public from being able to make informed decisions regarding their elected officials and keeps our elected officials and these business leaders from being held accountable for their actions as specifics concerning the bribery attempts and/or successes are not known. For certain issues of concern to the business world were discussed. It is reasonable to assume that strategies on how to implement the desires of these business leaders was also discussed. What is not known is how much of a buy-off, i.e. bribe, our elected officials took, whether it be money, favors, promise of political office such as the Presidency of the United States, etc... That's because the ground rules for the invitation-only meeting required the participants' confidentiality -- even if some were elected leaders, discussing the public's business. The participants were sworn to secrecy, both business, and political, leaders. This suggests a direct attempt on the part of the host to circumvent the rights and laws of the citizens of the United States of America. It also reveals the intent of the American Enterprise Institute, that they should be in control of our country, and not us. It also expresses a willingness of both business, and political leaders to engage in criminal activity, such as bribery, treason (by taking bribes and making laws according to the desires of certain people only,, it gives opportunity for enemies of this country, some of which may be operating here or have contacts here legally; it gives them opportunity to potentially dumb-down our national defenses and/or military readiness; attention must be brought to the fact that there are many foreign-owned businesses operation here in the United States), and other activities that are currently illegal. It is also a violation of the public trust in our elected officials (not that we actually trust them) as our leaders do not discuss the events of the meeting, merely attempt to force them upon us, thus producing a de facto slave state. It is a violation of "no taxation without representation," a first motivation in the founding of this country. Through the different bribes being offered, and taken, various tax laws can be, and probably are, being passed, providing a tax shelter for the very wealthy while placing an undue burden on the backs of those with less than a certain income. Secret meetings such as these also create an "exceptional" class in America. Being exceptional, that is, special, in and of itself is not necessarily a bad thing; but when a person's exceptionalism is dependent upon having secret meetings with public officials and getting special laws passed or court judgments in their favor to the exclusion of the general public, then it becomes very wrong. The founding fathers (George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, etc...) believed that all men should have equal standing in matters of law. The passing of laws to the benefit of a few at the expense of the many puts an undue burden, a tax, on the general populace that has to bear it. This creates a class of people that think they are above the law, an "All men are created equal, but some men are more equal than others" situation. An impressive array of power attended the conservative think tank's World Forum 2014, according to a printed program first disclosed in late April by the Center for Public Integrity. House Speaker John Boehner and other Republican congressional leaders; potential 2014 GOP presidential hopefuls like Florida Sen. Marco Rubio, New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie and Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker; Apple CEO Tim Cook; beer magnate Pete Coors; TD Ameritrade founder-turned-billionaire conservative activist Joe Ricketts, and executives from venture-capital firms. Listed above are some of the conspirators in this year's event. House Speaker John Boehner (third in line for the presidency of the United States), Marco Rubio, Chris Christie and Scott Walker - all three with good names - all three presidential hopefuls. While other wealthy and influential people are mentioned, the fact that four presidential candidates are mentioned, in combination with topics already discussed, brings one thing to mind: The members, and possibly the financiers, of American Enterprise Institute are seeking to unlawfully take control this country by taking away our right to vote as citizens of the United States of America. This is an act of aggression against the people of the United States and an act of war. That certain of our leaders, both political are economic, are invited suggests a pre-screening of sorts. It appears that members of the American Enterprise Institute investigate people for potential willingness to commit these crimes and, if you are wealthy or influential enough, you get invited, provided you can keep your mouth shut about the criminal activities going on. Similar events occur across the political spectrum giving powerful people with deep pockets face-to-face exchanges with national and state leaders the average American cannot match. Last month, a group of liberals held closed sessions in Chicago under the banner of Democracy Alliance to talk political strategy for progressive causes. Both Republicans (conservatives) and Democrats (the above-mentioned liberals) are undermining the electoral process of the United States of American and taking away our rights as citizens to satisfy their own lusts. And in early May, state lawmakers from around the country convened privately in Kansas City, Missouri, with business leaders as part of the corporately financed American Legislative Exchange Council. The group's task forces met to write recommended bills on topics from education and tax law to environmental regulation, labor law, and criminal justice that ALEC's legislative members will sponsor in their statehouses. Write our laws in advance?!?! Our treasonous, sell-out legislators craft our laws according to the lusts and desires of themselves and the lusts and desires of their campaign donors. Those "people" (and that is the nicest thing I can call them without going into a string of profanity that would make someone sick) have the nerve to tell me I have a vote in the goings-on in this country with a straight face the whole time lying to me, all with a straight face. It would have been better for them to say, "Hey stupid! You are a slave and we are the masters. Actually, these rich business folks are the masters, and we are their whores. You are just the rags we use to wash ourselves with." ALEC wants to control what our children are taught?! Meeting in secret to discuss what is taught in our education system suggests that something criminal is going on, perhaps things like the United Nations' plan to teach "the joys of masturbation" to kindergartners as part of their sexuality "education" program. And, yes, the UN does have a sexuality education program. Having seen it for myself, it does not discuss biology as one would/might think, but rather sexual practices and the false equality of them. Tax laws? These rich criminals craft themselves laws in advance, writing out what punishments, if any, they think they should get, probably with many loopholes with which they can avoid even those penalties. This is in addition to the laws concerning environmental regulation (the earth, global warming, whether or not protesters can actually protest), labor laws (hiring illegal aliens), and criminal justice laws (which determine punishments for crimes). The corruption, the wickedness, that exists within our government knows no bounds. The deceptively yet appropriately titled American legislative Exchange Council tells you exactly what they are about. They exchange their money for the ability to craft what laws they want to be governed by. Both federal and state legislators are only too happy to take them up on their offer, either not realizing or not caring whether our rights, our freedom, even our national sovereignty, is trampled on. Organizers and participants say the closed sessions allow public and private sector titans (high-powered/influential political and business leaders) to discuss candidly topics ranging from foreign affairs and intelligence gathering to tax policy and elections strategy. Pay attention to what is being said here. Both members of ALEC, business leaders, and political leaders are admitting to bribe making and bribe taking. They are confessing that not only are bribes taking place, but that this allows them to bribe and be bribed without fear of prosecution! Foreign affairs? Perhaps ALEC, despite all their talk about returning sovereignty to the states, is actually in favor of a global government with the United States of America playing a submissive part. Perhaps ALEC participants are looking to find themselves some nice tax havens for all the money they are raking in.. Intelligence gathering? Who are they gathering intelligence on? The American public? Again, meeting behind closed doors, ALEC organizers and participants are in reality engaging in criminal behavior, seeking to bypass surveillance laws already on the books, looking for ways to buy our private information without any legal ramifications. Tax policy is next. My grandfather always said the rich man will get his, meaning the rich man (or woman) will always find a way to make money, even if it means doing it illegally. It looks like he was right. Election strategy. The only reason they could be discussing election strategy in private is to decide in advance who is gong to be elected. Think it not possible? All it would take is a few people in the right places, such as media, coupled with the right amount of cash, and the flow of information could be directed to make one candidate look like a god and the other look like a devil (as was done with President Obama in is 2008 election campaign). While it is true that there is mud-slinging on both sides, one way to tell who will/already has "win" an election is to see which one appears to be putting up a lackluster fight, that is, whoever looks like they are not fighting as aggressively as they normally would be expected to. But some open-government advocates say the events reduce confidence in the democratic process. Democracy means ruling class of people or people with power, not the people rule, as you might have been told. It comes from the Greek word demos, meaning 'people,' and the suffix -cracy, frequently seen in connection with persons of authority. A democracy, therefore, is a country ruled by one to a few people who exercise authority over many, often thinking they are better than everyone else, thinking they are above the law. They fashion themselves after the gods and goddesses of the ancient pantheisms of the world, persons who rule absolutely in their own realm of influence and anyone who questions them or tries to get them to question themselves (to see if they are wrong on something) is an obstacle to be overcome. The democratic process referred to above simply means whoever can give the biggest bribes and whoever takes the biggest bribes gets the power. Average voters with little to no money get nothing. "This just creates more ways for mega-donors and elected officials t get together and talk about public policy behind closed doors," said Miles Rapaport, the president of Common Cause, which advocates for less concentration of political power. Mr. Rapaport is recognizing that this process goes on without the use of closed-door meetings. It also suggests the wealthiest of the wealthy are are pushing out those who are "merely" wealthy. It also appears that Mr. Rapaport has recently been cut out of the loop and is upset by it. Common Cause appears to be an organization that likes exceptions to be made for itself and Mr. Rapaport as Mr. Rapaport's anger appears directed at mega-donors having access to elected officials and not that the elected leadership is taking bribes. Having an exception made for you is not in itself a bad thing. What makes an exception, that is, special treatment, bad is when it is done solely for the benefit of a few people who have no need of it. "Less concentration of political power" is simply code for "back away from the bribery pie and let me get a slice." If you want special treatment regarding a certain thing, that is fine. Go out and work for it. Never, ever, bribe someone for special treatment. It is a form of stealing, as it takes away a person's right to approach their leaders to make requests of them on various matters of interest, and creates a de facto slave state in which the general public unwittingly do the bidding of a few rich folk, ofttimes against their will. Boehner, who is an ALEC member according to the group's website, said such events are "very educational." Of course they are, Speaker Boehner! you get educated on just how much people are willing to pay for your vote and the payees, a.k.a. bribers, get educated as to how much they have to pay and what they can get for it. All with the benefit of the general public, the "unexceptional", remaining "un"-educated as to what is really happening and what their leaders are really like. It should also be noted that only Republicans and conservatives are mentioned here by name. Democrats are mentioned, but only by the vague term liberals. This indicates that The Associated Press is biased in favor of the Democrat party and against the Republican party. This gives legitimacy to the claim that the media is bias in favor of President Obama as President Obama is a Democrat. At the Center for Responsive Politics, executive director Sheila Krumholz said private meetings between "the regulators and the regulated" are part of the process, but the venue and the breadth of the closed gatherings matter, she argued. Responsive politics means that our leaders' actions while in power respond to stimulus. Given that it has been clearly demonstrated that bribes are taking place and that our leaders are taking them, I would have to say that responsive politics means elected officials who are willing to take a bribe. So bribery attempts are part of the process? This indicates a wide-spread practice on a scale that is mind-boggling and that the general public should just accept it. It also indicates that Miss Krumholz has participated in previous bribery parties, didn't get invited to this one, and is upset about it, just like Mr. Rapaport. "The concern is that these get-togethers offer opportunity for extended exposure in a relaxed setting," she said. Offer opportunity for extended exposure in a relaxed setting for bribes to take place? Miss Krumholz is a smart woman. She knows that this is what is taking place at these events and in what setting. Miss Krumholz, however, has slipped up. In complaining about the unfair treatment afforded the very wealthy, she reveals that she is not upset about bribes taking place, only that she is not afforded the same opportunity to do so. Neither Miss Krumholz, the organizers of these buy-off events such as the American Enterprise Institute and ALEC (American Legislative Exchange Program), nor our elected leaders (political titans), such as John Boehner, Chris Christie, Marco Rubio, and others, nor these wealthy business leaders (business titans), care anything about the rights of the average American citizenn, nor that they are subverting the rights of their fellow citizens. Perhaps they think they are "above the crowd," which in politi-speak usually means above the law. "It's all very conducive to a good rapport... That's an invaluable advantage -- and not one afforded to average constituents." Being able to bribe a public official in private is an invaluable advantage, and one that makes it easy to freely offer bribes, for a criminal, and the crook official that takes the bribe. It means they don't have to worry about getting caught and going to jail. Miss Krumholz (I almost spelled her name Krumblez, which is what her story, our public officials' story, and their bribers story is doing) is telling a massive secret here. She, along with Mr. Rapaport and the Associated Press, is saying that our elected officials are for sale, not everyone is worthy to be able to bribe them, i.e. can't afford their price, and that a lot of people who seem like they are looking out for the rights of the American citizen only want a piece of the action. In summary, the political system in America is filled with whores, with the crooked rich folk engaging the services of our elected officials doing the selling. A sex-whore on the street has more dignity about herself than that of our elected officials. At least the sex-whore doesn't pretend to be something she is not.
  18. By: Marshall Ramsey II, Worthy News U.S. Correspondent KNOCKNAREA, Ireland (WorthyNews) -- Archaeologists at IT Sligo have found the bones of an adult and a child in a tiny cave high on Knocknarea mountain near the town of the same name. Researchers discovered a total of 13 small bones and bone fragments in an almost inaccessible cave last November. Three were from a child and 10 from the adult. They included foot bones and fragments of skull. The adult was aged 30 to 39 and the child of four to six years. While it was not possible to determine the gender, radiocarbon dating has shown that they are some 5,500 years old, making them among the earliest human bones found in the county. Interestingly, it appears that the two are not related, that is, they are not a parent/sibling combination. The adult was dated to be about 5,500 years old whereas the child about 300 years younger. While there is no definite proof, it is possible that the mountain-top grave is an ancestral family tomb, as families of that time, once a piece of land had been reached, settled in the area, and started up communities. LINK TO JESUS So what about the link to Jesus Christ? The answer lies in the meanings of the name. According to the Placenames Database of Ireland, Knocknarea (Conc na Riabh in Irish) means 'hill of the stripes.' This is a reference to Jesus receiving the stripes on his back during his crucifixion, notably mentioned in the book of Isaiah, chapter 53: "But he was wounded for our transgressions, he was bruised for our iniquities: The chastisement of our peace was upon him; AND WITH HIS STRIPES WE ARE HEALED."(emphasis mine) However, this in itself is not enough. More information must be obtained before making a concrete link between Knocknarea and the Lord Jesus. While the Placenames Database of Ireland lists the meaning of Knocknarea as "hill of the stripes," other possibilities exist. P.W. Joyce suggested the name meant "hill of the executions." This would be spelled Cnoc na Riaghadh. This would be a reference to the Lord Jesus being executed, a.k.a. crucified, on Golgotha, also called Calvary. "And after that they had mocked him, they took the robe off from him, and put his own raiment on him, and led him away to crucify him. And when they were come unto a place called Golgotha, that is to say, a place of a skull, And they crucified him, and parted his garments, casting lots:..." Another possible etymology is "hill of the kings," Conc na Riogha. This refers to Jesus Christ being King of the Jews as mentioned in Matthew 27. Yet one more meaning of Knocknarea has been proposed that links it to Jesus Christ. This one is "hill of the moon." This reference comes from a BBC article in which Knocknarea is in mentioned regarding a cairn that let light in from the moon at mid-winter. This feature is highly reminiscent of the Great Pyramid of Giza in Egypt. This last reference is a bit tricky and references an Akkadian deity. Sin was the name of an Akkadian deity and was seen as a god of the moon. Second Corinthians 5:21 says that God made Jesus to be sin for us, even though Jesus himself knew no sin. Now concerning the word moon. The Irish word for moon is gealach. As you can see, it does not match the Irish spellings for Knocknarea. However due to its astronomical significance, it has received the title "hill of the moon." This provides a fourth link between Jesus and Knocknarea. The evidence is clear. Knocknarea in Ireland was so named to provide a direct link to Jesus Christ, that he should be killed, and that it should be for us and not for himself. "And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself:..." For source information, please go to http://conspiracyprophecyguy.blogspot.com/2014/03/testimony-of-jesus-christ-found-in.html.
  19. By: Marshall Ramsey II, Worthy News U.S. Correspondent CHARLESTON, SC - (WorthyNews) It may be about to get really warm in Charleston if U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham is correct. On September 3, 2013, Senator Graham addressed a home crowd in Goose Creek, SC, on Tuesday regarding the ongioing civil war in Syria. Sen. Graham told reporters that taking action on Syria is not a question of whether or not we should, but how bad do we want the consequences of our actions, or inactions, to be. He stated that if there is no U.S. response (meaning an attack on Syria by U.S. forces), then Iran will not believe the United States' resolve to block Iran from getting nuclear weapons in the hands of terrorists, and those terrorists detonating a nuclear device in Charleston Harbor. "I believe that if we get Syria wrong, within six months - and you can quote me on this - there will be a war between Iran and Israel over their nuclear program," Graham said. "It won't come to America on top of a missile, it'll come in the belly of a ship in the Charleston or New York Harbor." According to Senator Graham's own statements, he has advanced knowledge of a potential nuclear attack on America. According to Senator Graham, the only way to stop this nuclear attack on the U.S. is to attack the nation of Syria. This leaves some very disturbing conclusions to draw. Conclusion #1: The United States of America is being extorted by the government of Iran. With the United States' vastly superior military might, we could destroy Iran off the map within a couple of days; so the only conclusion to be drawn here is that the United States government under President Obama wants it this way. It also means that President Obama stands to profit in some manner from a nuclear attack on the United States. Conclusion #2: Senator Graham, while having direct personal knowledge of a forth-coming nuclear attack, is refusing to consider a preemptive strike against the Iranians. This also suggests that he stands to profit in some manner from an attack on the United States of America. Conclusion #3: Given the unfortunately likely scenarios addressed in conclusions 1 & 2, it presents a third conclusion, one far more terrifying that a nuclear strike: That the safety and security of the people of the Untied States of America is for sale to the highest bidder. My grandfather told me something when I was a young man: "A Western businessman will sell you the rope you are going to use to hang him with." Although this isn't a situation dealing with American businessmen, it is actually much worse: The leaders the people of the United States of America elect to public office, expecting them to protect us from outside aggression, are for sale to the highest bidder. Does this mean that all politicians are able to be bribed, and therefore treasonous? No. But the above article, combined with known bribery attempts during the passage of the Affordable Care Act, a.k.a. Obamacare, does suggest that there are some, if not a lot, who would do such a thing. The only question is: How far does the corruption go? Time is almost up for Senator Graham's words to be prophetic. As it happens, there are two Iranian warships headed toward the U.S. coast. Although the names of the ships are unknown at this time, we do know that one is an Iranian destroyer and the other is a logistics helicopter carrier. It is being billed as a training mission, one that would give them technical knowledge of our coastline and our response to perceived threats. With this data, the Iranians could conceivably put together a plan whereby they could detonate a nuclear weapon on American soil. These are dark days for the United States of America. Neither Charleston nor New York harbors appear to be safe. Who will save us, or will our leaders sell us out for a few Syrian pounds or some Iranian rials? God help us. Source articles: http://grassrootjournal.com/lindsey-graham-syria-and-iran-will-nuke-charleston-harbor-if-we-dont-bomb-syria/ http://charlotte.cbslocal.com/2013/09/03/graham-nukes-in-hands-of-terrorists-could-result-in-bomb-coming-to-charleston-harbor/ http://www.timesofisrael.com/iranian-warships-en-route-to-us-territorial-waters/ http://www.fitsnews.com/2013/09/06/lindsey-graham-attack-syria-or-iran-will-nuke-charleston/
  20. I actually went through and tried to eliminate the reference notes. I guess I missed one. Here is a link to where you can investigate the references: http://conspiracyprophecyguy.blogspot.com/2014/01/burial-place-of-judah-ben-israel-found.html
  21. By: Marshall Ramsey II, Worthy News U.S. Correspondent ABYDOS, Egypt (WorthyNews)- An amazing discovery has been made that will cause controversy for many years to come. As you may have heard, the tomb of a previously unknown Egyptian pharaoh, Woseribre Senebkay, was found at South Abydos in Sohag province about 300 miles south of Cairo, Egypt. Woseribre (also spelled Waseribre) is believed to be a king of a forgotten Abydos dynasty that ruled from about 1650-1600 B.C. According to an article at www.discovery.com, the tomb was found by people from the University of Pennsylvania working with Egypt's Supreme Council of Antiquities. 'It rested in a four-chambered tomb amidst the fragmented debris of his coffin, funerary mask and canopic chest. Such chests were used to contain the organs of an individual.' The evidence offered that Waseribre Sebenkay is Judah, son of Israel, is in the name. A was in ancient Egypt is often called a scepter. In Genesis 49, when the patriarch Israel was giving blessings to his children, he said this concerning Judah: "The sceptre shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh come; and unto him shall the gathering of the people be." As is common among ancient cultures, vowels are not used when spelling. This can give a wide variety of spellings of the same name. In this case, Woseribre could be spelled Waseribre, Waseriber, Wasreibre, and others. Another feature of ancient cultures, including some modern ones in northern Africa, is to worship ones ancestors. Occasionally, these ancestors would be deified, perhaps being referred to by other names. In the case of Israel, he was called Kronos by the Greeks.(3) According to the Phoenician historian Sanchuniathon, Kronos (called Israel by them) had a special son named Zhe-ut. Zhe-ut is a variation of the Greek word Zeus, both of which are variations of the word Yehudah, or Judah. This establishes a link that sometimes real-life people take on mythological names, whether the name was taken by themselves or given them by later generations. Judah also came to be known by other names, including Djehuty and Thoth. The father of Thoth was Re/Ra, the Egyptian sun god. As Thoth is Judah, and Thoth is the son of Ra, this would make Re Israel. Take a look back at the name of the newly discovered pharaoh, Woseribre. Woser, or Wasre would be rendered, given the information above, scepter of Re. Judah, when receiving his father's blessing was associated with the scepter. The scepter was a staff that signaled that the bearer of the staff was the new head of the tribe. Judah, who is Thoth, and identified with the scepter, thus takes on the name Woser, or Wasre. The next part of Waseribre Senebkay's first name is ibre. Ib is likened to the Muslim word ibn, which means son. With Re having previously being identified as Israel, ibre is thus rendered "son of Israel." Combined with the first part Waser, Waseribre, is rendered "scepter of Israel, the son of Israel." This is a clear identification of Waseribre as Judah ben Israel. The word Senebkay also points to Judah. Judah is identified Genesis with a lion. Lions are known for power and strength. Seneb in Egyptian is rendered power/strength. This would give the interpretation of Wasreibre Senebkay as "scepter of Israel, the son of Israel, the lion." I am unsure as to what the suffix 'kay' means, however, it appears that it would not affect the meaning of the name Woseribre Senebkay, and its identification as Judah the son of Israel. www.discovery.com contributed to this report.
  22. By: Marshall Ramsey II, Worthy News U.S. Correspondent WASHINGTON, District of Columbia (WorthyNews) -- The United States government, under President Obama, is acquiring chemical weapons from Syria for use in drone strikes. Under the pretense of destroying Syria's chemical weapons stockpile, the United States will begin processing their own chemical weapons on board the MV Cape Ray. Marketed as being used in the destruction of these stockpiles, it conflicts with a report from 2013 that the United States government recently destroyed four chemical weapons incinerators located within the United States. The Pentagon spent $10.2 billion over three decades burning tons of deadly nerve gas and other chemical weapons stored in four states — some of the agents so deadly even a few drops can kill. The United States Army is currently spending $1.3 billion on a project dismantling the incinerators they spent so much money on building and using. The MV Cape Ray was built in 1977 by Kawasaki Heavy Industries Ltd., Japan, and called the MV Seaspeed Asia. It was acquired by the U.S. Department of Transportation, Maritime Administration April 29, 1991, and named the Cape Ray February 1, 1994. The MV Cape Ray is currently in the Caribbean Sea heading toward the Mediterranean where it will meet up with ships from Denmark and Norway, which will then transfer a portion of Syria's chemical weapons stockpile for use in U.S. drone strikes. The current position of the Cape Ray contradicts press releases from www.afp.com and www.defensenews.com/ which state that the vessel is still two weeks from being seaworthy due to the supposed outfitting of the ship with equipment designed to destroy chemical weapons. The need for the U.S. to acquire chemical weapons from Syria is thrown into question by Frank Kendall, a top Pentagon weapons-buyer, said on Jan. 2. "This is not new technology. This is not a high-risk thing that hasn't been done before. This technology has been used for the past 10 years to destroy our own chemical weapons," he said. In 1993, the United States ratified the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC), which prohibits the "development, production, acquisition, stockpiling, retention, and transfer or use of chemical weapons." If Mr. Kendall is to be believed, it appears that the United States only started destroying its chemical weapons stockpile in 2003, the same time as the passage of the Syria Accountability Act, signed by then-President George W. Bush. Another piece of information that gives rise to the belief that the U.S. is trying to weaponize and/or use chemical weapons in drone strikes is the cost. According to an unnamed U.S. official, “The system in question is a neutralization system. It is both more expensive and less reliable than incineration due to the need to deal with the millions of gallons of waste product.” If the sea-based hydrolysis system is more costly than incineration, why go through the trouble of building it? A safer guess would be that there is no intention to neutralize these chemicals, but the "increased cost" is the actual cost of building a sea-based chemical weapons production facility. Another suspicious piece of information is the fact that the MV Cape Ray, owned by the United States government, is flying the flag of the Marshall Islands. While it is true that the Marshall Islands were once governed by the United States, they received full autonomy in 1986 under a "Compact of Free Association" with the United States, and have been an independent nation ever since. Syria's chemical weapons stockpile was picked up at the port town of Latakia. Latakia is approximately 53.53 miles from the city of Tartus, which, in 2012, was speculated to be the site of a chemical weapons pickup from Syria by Russia . It was believed at the time that Russia would take possession of the chemical (and biological) weapons and agents from Syria, process them in facilities in Russia, and then deliver them to Syria at a later date. The drones, which are set to carry chemical weapons into battle, are to be used not only in joint military efforts around the world, but also with "combination forces," that is, U.S. and foreign militaries fighting as a single force. Another mystery surrounding the situation is the need for rapid transfer of said weapons into international control. According to U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry, the "amount and type of chemical weapons must be agreed and "rapidly" placed under international control." The amount and type agreed portion of the statement suggests that only certain types of chemicals and weapons were held in interest. That they should be desired for "rapid transfer" to international control, indicates that the United Nations has an interest in acquiring chemical weapons, not for the purpose of destroying them, but for using them, possibly on dissident or rogue nations and/or people. While this conclusion may seen incredible, even conspiracy theorist in nature, it clearly fits the evidence at hand. The only question now is, "Who will be on the receiving end of the wrath of the United States, Russia, and the United Nations?" Source information links can be found at the following website: http://conspiracyprophecyguy.blogspot.com/2014/01/president-obama-acquiring-chemical.html
  23. Good day Einstein, I thought that posts 14 and 15 solved the paradox from your OP, didn't they, in your opinion? Best wishes, Thomas Not exactly, Many parts of the creation story are scientifically incorrect. Being that all stars being created on the same day wouldn't explain all the variation of age of the stars everywhere. You presume that all stars have different ages. A carbon sample from a snail living today gives an age of 27,000 years. What say you to that?
  24. Actually, they do. The Big Bang theory is the starting point for all of your arguments. Astrophysics, from your point of view, involves the creation of the universe from a large explosion presumed to be on the far end of the universe. Evolution claims that all living things started from non-living material. The evolutionary standpoint of the creation of the universe is that there is no God, thus the universe created itself, a.k.a. the Big Bang. Besides, the only way energy can form anything is if it be directed to, and that takes intelligence. The only option you have is to say that the energy, a non-living thing, is in fact alive, and has intelligence, thus proving that the universe and all forms of energy contained therein came from an intelligent, creative source; a Person that exists outside of their own creation. Which is exactly what the Bible says.
  25. I will meditate on your precepts and fix my eyes on your ways. Psalms 119:15 (ESV) ~ If One Really Loved The Scientific Study Of Dirt And Stars And Such How can a young man keep his way pure? By guarding it according to your word. Psalms 119:9 (ESV) Why Would One Mock The Words Always learning and never able to arrive at a knowledge of the truth. 2 Timothy 3:7 (ESV) Of Their Creator In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God. All things were made through him, and without him was not any thing made that was made. In him was life, and the life was the light of men. The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness has not overcome it. John 1:1-5 (ESV) And Is There Any Hope For Such A Fellow And, behold, two blind men sitting by the way side, when they heard that Jesus passed by, cried out, saying, Have mercy on us, O Lord, thou Son of David. And the multitude rebuked them, because they should hold their peace: but they cried the more, saying, Have mercy on us, O Lord, thou Son of David. And Jesus stood still, and called them, and said, What will ye that I shall do unto you? They say unto him, Lord, that our eyes may be opened. So Jesus had compassion on them, and touched their eyes: and immediately their eyes received sight, and they followed him. Matthew 20:30-34 (KJV) I'm not trying to mock, just questioning You are lying. You think all, if not most Christians are stupid because they believe in a Creator, and you thought you would come in here and cause a bunch of trouble with unscientific and unsubstantiated information. I have a question for you. Evolutionary science says that all the energy in the universe came from outside it. Energy is a substance that has no intelligence. How then did the energy move from outside the physical universe into it without intelligence being behind it?
×
×
  • Create New...