JDavis

you take someone refusing to answer an inane "what if" question to mean they would disobey the law and you accuse me of spinning.

how many times have we tried this in the past and failed? Egos get in the way of people in power.

If you dont want your children to be exposed to any intoxicating substances then teach them well and hope they learn the lesson. The legality of these substances have no bearing on if your children will be exposed to them. As for if the cure would be worse than the disease, try telling someone going through Chemo that is using marijuana to be able to control the nausea and vomiting that comes with it so that they can actually eat enough for their body to survive the Chemo that the pot is bad for them. and I cant help but notice you are sticking to your statement that the only people that want marijuana legalized are people that want to get intoxicated by it, legally, even though you have been told that it is a false statement.

Perhaps instead of people getting thicker skins you should refrain from making overly broad, stereotyping statements that make accusations against people you know nothing about.... And you do not bring people to Christ by forcing them to think and act like you

It's a good question because it reveals the true nature of Obamacare. Like I said, when the chef refuses to eat the food from his own kitchen, that should send up a red flag that something is wrong. It is very problematic when our government makes laws and then places itself above those laws. The very people who have written Obamacare took care to exempt themselves from it, because it is a trainwreck and is the first step toward a single payer system and socialized medicine. And now we have people like Sebelius know how much Obamacare stinks and wants nothing of it. She is a hypocrite because she expects us to abide by a law that she herself refuses to follow. If we were to reject Obamacare we get penalized, but her rejection of Obamacare is justified in doing so. Hypocrisy is when you condemn in others what you justify in yourself. But it's not just her. The problem with your attack is that she is following the law. Also she never said she would not follow the law. What she did was refuse to answer an inane question. And for that you attack her. If she really believed in obamacare, she would not have hesitated to say, "yes, this is a good law and if I ever get the chance to enroll, I would happily do so." The fact that she could not bring herself to admit such (because she knows how terrible it is), shows how bad this law really is. She didn't say she wouldn't, but her refusal to answer says just as much as she could have said by simply saying, "no." My comments are aimed more at the hypocrisy of the left and Sebelius is a good example of that hypocrisy. Obamacare cannot be defended on honest ground. It requires not answering simple questions, by outright lies (as we have seen over and over) and by simply ignoring the reality of what people are suffering as a result of Obamacare. Nobody should answer childish what if questions. They hold no place is adult discourse. if that is the best question you can ask you need a new job

It's a good question because it reveals the true nature of Obamacare. Like I said, when the chef refuses to eat the food from his own kitchen, that should send up a red flag that something is wrong. It is very problematic when our government makes laws and then places itself above those laws. The very people who have written Obamacare took care to exempt themselves from it, because it is a trainwreck and is the first step toward a single payer system and socialized medicine. And now we have people like Sebelius know how much Obamacare stinks and wants nothing of it. She is a hypocrite because she expects us to abide by a law that she herself refuses to follow. If we were to reject Obamacare we get penalized, but her rejection of Obamacare is justified in doing so. Hypocrisy is when you condemn in others what you justify in yourself. But it's not just her. The problem with your attack is that she is following the law. Also she never said she would not follow the law. What she did was refuse to answer an inane question. And for that you attack her.

Oddly enough many healthy white men will try and deny this is true

She didn't answer period....she like a great many people do not like to play "what if " games. What a stupid question to ask her Actually, it was a very good question and her refusal to answer demonstrates that she knows Obamacare is a failure. She is the one who is charged with implementing it. She is the head of HHS. If there is anyone who should be a cheerleader for Obamacare it should be her. That not even she is willing to sign up for it if given the chance, tells us that it is something none of us want. LIberal are such hypocrites. "what if" questing are never very good questions, they are normaly the last act of desperate person. In this case it was also a "gotcha" question, if she had answered "yes' you would have called her a liar. If she refuses to answer you call her a hypocrite. Hard to win with those kinds of odds.

She didn't answer period....she like a great many people do not like to play "what if " games. What a stupid question to ask her

glad to have you along, this is a great place to be lots of ideas and be able to do so in a mostly friendly manner. I hope you stick around and start to give as much as you get!

Lot us hope it is bad enough to overcome the self inflicted damage the shutdown did to the GOP

I agree and that is a distinct possibility. In every country with single payer the rich and powerful still have their own rules

Congress and every federal employee already fall under the same rules as everyone else. If their employer offers a plan that qualifies and they are happy with they get to keep it. I dont see anyone telling Boeing or ATT they have to put all their people on exchanges.

I applaud both the Germans and Brazilian governments, government has so over stepped the boundaries of freedom, and its only matter of time when these same powers will be used against people, if they are not all ready You applaud censorship and restriction of what a citizen is allowed to see or read? Seriously? you must not understand what the filter does, people can go anywhere on the web in Germany and Brazil the filter simply makes it impossible to follow your travel to your address, much the same way "Hide your IP" websites work you are mistaken. those who control the server control the access. Everything from sites to the answer you get in your search engine can all be filtered through the server. this is what China has been doing for every and now these countries will join in.. Also, as much as you buy into every CT out there, the I find the fact you think the IP hiders work to be amazing.

I find it hard to believe that all these countries expressing outrage are not doing the same thing to us and their citizens. If you have not done so Google "nsa utah data center" and see the nice new pretty building they have and the computing and storage power they have in it.