AMD2093

The Big Bang has yet to be proven. so has God... whats your point? the "Big bang theory" is a theory. a theory is something that is yet to be disproved. the "big bang" is no more proved than God, and God is no more disproved than the big bang. ================================================================================================================= I beg to differ sir, Here check this on the Science and Faith Forum: i obviously mean SCIENTIFIC proof. Sure, we say "Everything exists, we have the Bible, so there must be a god" but that is not SCIENTIFIC proof. God has NOT been scientifically proven OR disproved. just like the big bang. Did you read the link? This statement is Nonsensical. You can't Scientifically Prove a Past Event...it doesn't fit into the Scientific Method yes i did read it. it was not scientific proof of iether God OR the big bang, and therefore did not even make sense as an argument so i dismissed it.

thats the point.

The Big Bang has yet to be proven. so has God... whats your point? the "Big bang theory" is a theory. a theory is something that is yet to be disproved. the "big bang" is no more proved than God, and God is no more disproved than the big bang. ================================================================================================================= I beg to differ sir, Here check this on the Science and Faith Forum: i obviously mean SCIENTIFIC proof. Sure, we say "Everything exists, we have the Bible, so there must be a god" but that is not SCIENTIFIC proof. God has NOT been scientifically proven OR disproved. just like the big bang.

"using initials instead of words when swearing is not allowed." So he should have used words! she* what do you even mean?

why couldnt God have created that extremely dense mass of matter in his creation of the earth/universe? God can do anything he wants. you werent there. you cant possibly know that what is described in the Bible didnt APPEAR AS a "big bang"

THIS ^^ many dont. thats why im asking

====================================================================================================== What "People" are you referring to? We are admonished to..... (1 Thessalonians 5:21) "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." and (Proverbs 18:13) "He that answereth a matter before he heareth it, it is folly and shame unto him." So personally, I scrutinize everything 6 ways from Sunday. Just a cursory look @ the Big Bang Theory reveals the Sun before the Earth (and then the completely Nonsensical Nebular Hypothesis which is laughable "scientifically" speaking but that's for another discussion) GOD'S WORD says the Earth was First and the SUN, Moon, and Stars were Day 4. See the Conundrum? So instead of using "science" as my Hermeneutic Filter, I Choose GOD'S WORD instead. Well you not only have a problem with The Plain WORD in Genesis, you've got major issues here..... (Exodus 20:11) "For in six days the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the LORD blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it." Wise enough? Well the point is..... if we can't believe what GOD Plainly says in Genesis, which is then confirmed quite demonstrably in Exodus (above), what can we believe? Do we pick and choose? if God made Earth void and with no shape, why couldnt he have made the sun with no light? & who knows, even if the big bang theory is true, it doesnt mean everything happened in the order that the scientists think it did.

The Big Bang has yet to be proven. so has God... whats your point? the "Big bang theory" is a theory. a theory is something that is yet to be disproved. the "big bang" is no more proved than God, and God is no more disproved than the big bang.

Yes it does....it has the Sun prior to the Earth with no water. And by extension, single celled life or primitive life before man. Other than that, it only has 30 other things wrong with it im not talking about evolution. im ONLY talking about the "big bang"

i think you need to reread my *whole* post.

A LOT of Christians say the big bang is *** edited to change the phrase the author chose to "not true" *** but Why cant God have created it? Maybe when God created Earth in the 6 days, it appeared as the Big bang... the big bang has yet to be disproved, so lets pretend it definitely happened.... why not? We werent there to see it. You cant see God, yet he hasnt been disproved and we all (On this site anyway) believe God is real. I dont understand why so many Christians cant imagine GOD creating the Big bang, I mean he created everything else in this world we can and cant see, hear, smell, taste, feel. So what is the problem with him creating the Earth in 6 days, and it appearing as the big bang?

a lot of churches arent like that these days, and even if they are, many are corrupt. i think people who dont like churcg would like heaven much more.

Its something where Christians believe in science to explain everything. But i dont understand. science DOES explain most things. so why cant we say something like "Science proves the big bang happened.... But i think God created the big bang" that seems to make sense to me! does that make me one of those Science Christian people? God created the earth in 6 days and rested on the 7th. so who is to say that this didnt - in human time- take thousands or millions of years and that if humans were there to see God create everything, to the human, it wouldnt look like the big bang? I say God created the universe the way the Bible describes, but I also say that that was the "big bang" and would have appeared to be a huge explosion & expansion of the universe if people had been there.

i've been confused by this since i was about 7. (Im 20 now!) There is ONE God. From my understanding, God created Jesus. which is a human, but himself. Makes sense, God & Jesus are the same person. So why do people say that Jesus sits in Heaven at Gods side? and why to we sometimes pray to God and other times to Jesus? and what does "In Jesus name we pray" mean?

I dont care if its chuck e cheese or the finest restaurant in the world, I like when kids are included. But I hate 2 things: 1: Babies crying & not being comforted/fed/whatever/ 2: Kids running wild or being rude or unnecessarily loud. I dont mind hearing a baby cry. I mind parents ignoring it. Like, your kid is crying, how can you sit there emotionless and ignore the kid?? Other than the fact that there is something wrong and the parents are ignoring whatever it is, its rude to the other people. Especially the ones who are out on a rare quiet day away from the kids. There is just no excuse to let your kid run wild in any public place that is not a chuck e cheese type of place or a park. When I was a kid it was a corner or a smack. Of course niether were ever used because I was too embaressed to get in trouble or having people look at me. But most kids arent like that and NEED some type of stimulation... outdoors or at a kids place. not in a restaurant. It is SO RUDE to let children run wild... and dangerous! They could fall and get hurt or unintentionally hurt someone else, break something, etc.... when I was little i would bring a reading or coloring book or small "Wont bother people" type of toys, or sometimes a handheld game with the sound turned off or a pair of headphones for my CD player.