warrior

1. Scientific theory is NOT based on religion. When are you people going to stop this tired old argument. 2. Again, science does not care what I think or what you think. You are basing your aguments from strawmen arguments and arguments from ignorance. You have completely missed the point. You are confusing your own beliefs with what the evidence of what science has shown us. Again, science does not care what your own personal beliefs are. Even Darwin admitted to this at the "second half" of his eye evolution statement that you theists take out of context. It does not matter if it does not make sense to me, if that is what the evidence shows. That is how it is regardless. 3. Tu quoque now eh? Please do not be so transparent. Try walking over to Europe and spread your beliefs with Christians over there and you will find out how disporportionate your Creationism beliefs are over seas. Like I said, it is the bandwagon here in America, due to our horrid Education system. If you take the time to actually learn the science and learn how it finds its answers. You would not be able to argue with it, vs your faith which is not based on any evidence what so ever. 4. The planets current positions, and where they are going at what accelerated rate vs where they might had been a billion years ago has already been carefully cacluated and a lot of research has been put into it. Speed of light is a constant. I don't know what Christian website you found with some evidence on this to be different, but its been the same. There is no such thing as speed of light that is infinite to reach our planet 6000 years ago and then suddenly drop off to its current constant speed.

If young earth was proven in any way or had any credible proof. Then this would not be an issue. This boils down to three points. 1. Science is NOT a religion. Science is not based on your personal feelings or beleifs. If "anyone" including you. Had the slightest proof against evolution, the slightest proof that the flood happened. Or even the tiniest iota of proof that under peer scrutiny that could prove a single claim of yours. Than this would not be an issue. Your gallup poll thing is largely over estimated. As Mark Twain put it. There are three kinds of lies. Lies, damned lies and statistics. Statistics is what those charts fall under. People in America by majority believe in creationist ideas because our education lacks horribly and they simply do not understand the science and neither do you. Which is why I claim you are arguing from ignorance. Anyone who tries to dispute evolution or the big bang is arguing from ignorance. Also, your gallup poll link. is the Band wagon fallacy. Just because an idea is popular, does not make it true. Need I remind you of the band wagon the church had on the idea that we were the center of the universe and everything revolved around US? As neil Dagrasse tyson once quoted which Is a bit funny and true. - The thing about science is that even if you do not agree with it, its still true. or it went something like that. Basically, Science does not care what your Christian scientists have to say. It does not matter if your faith gets its little feelings hurt or if a 2000 year old bed time story gets put out to pasture. Science does not care for human emotion, thoughts or understanding. It only cares about the actual answers that is based on the evidence that it finds though following the scientific method. Even if it takes a long time to get the answers. It only cares about the conclusion and nothing more. Also, radiometric dating is not the only thing we use for dating something. Its just one of the ways we go about doing so. Again, if someone really wants to learn how the earth was formed and how old the universe is. Just pick up some books on geology and how we calculate the speed of light and distence between objects and you will have answers as to many of the concerns that people have. It comes from a lack of understanding and education really. Its not your fault or anything and your not really stupid because of it. Your just illogical and ignorant.

Micro raptors are a hoax....well in a way. go look up micro raptor hoax for more information. After being examined, its not what it seems like.

If this was actual credible science. It would not be appearing on some "creationist science website". The number one golden rule of science is, no matter what your personal feelings are or what common sense tells you. If the evidence shows otherwise, that is how things are. If you Christians had a single bit of "actual" evidence to discredit, disprove, or prove anything. Scientists would give you a metal for coming forth with your evidence. Ever wonder why? Why, this has never happened? Because your psuedoscience claism has been debunked countless times as either coming from someone who is lying and does not actually know anything about science, or the ravings of a lunatic. Either way, you have nothing.

oh look. Another christian who knows nothing about evolution who thinks he is the genius biologist who just disproved evolution and its mountains of evidence backing it up.

I will put it like this. There is ZERO evidence that there was a flood 4000 years ago. There is ZERO evidence that the world is 6000 years old. There are tree's older then Creationists think the world is. The pope, almost every last cardinal, most other sects of christianity like babptists and othodoxists etc. All accept the fact that science is true no matter how much you do not understand it. A good idea, if you want to that is. Is go learn more about geology and how science is able to date things. There are several methods to dating rocks, minirals and how we can tell how old stuff is. Remember, the most important two fallacies to avoid. 1. Personal incredulity 2. God fo the gaps. I believe Bill Nye gave a good speach about all this in his Debate Vs Ken Ham. go watch it, its good stuff.