Jump to content

Dan_79

Members
  • Content count

    35
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

13 Good

About Dan_79

  • Birthday 07/11/1979

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    England
  • Interests
    Gardening, horticulture, reading, cycling, river fishing, walking, cooking
  1. http://www.fulcrum7.com/blog/2016/5/14/god-is-sending-islam-to-punish-the-west Islam is experiencing an extraordinary resurgence, and is now the world’sfastest growing religion. The hatred between Ishmael and Isaac is coming to a head. The world’s two largest religions will not cleave. Like iron and clay, Islam and the Christian West will never mix harmoniously. The West is rediscovering Islam’s age-old imperative of jihad, something not seen since the 17th Century. We in the West were not prepared for this new wave of Islamic violence. But it should remind of us some biblical history, when God allowed theenemies of Israel to have their way with His chosen people. Pagan nations were given access to just come in and take what they wanted, ruling with exacting cruelty. God’s people chafed under the Persians, Babylonians, Egyptians and Romans as a result of their disobedience. So let me propose that God is sending Islam to the West again, the stronghold of democracy and freedom underpinned by Christian values, to punish us for our debauchery and wickedness. God sometimes allows more sinful nations to punish his people—look at the Assyrians who swept away Israel, or the Babylonians who marched Judah into captivity. But it is interesting that our Muslim punishers hate the very sins the West is now known for: homosexuality, feminism, and consumption of alcohol among other things. Muslims deal with homosexuals in shocking ways. Feminism is not tolerated in Islam and alcohol is a forbidden drink. Consider western decline in the following areas:
  2. The Bible:

    The BIBLE: Handbook for Survivalists, Racists, Tax Protesters, Militants and Right-Wing Extremists. By Pastor Pete Peters "I am amazed that you are so quickly deserting Him who called you by the grace of Christ, for a different gospel; which is really not another; only there are some who are disturbing you, and want to distort the Gospel of Christ." Galatians 1:6,7. The preceding scripture reveals the tendency for people to abandon the true gospel and the tendency of others to actually DISTORT the true gospel of Christ. America's problems are a direct result of such reckless abandonment and treacherous deliberate distortion. The Bible clearly teaches righteousness EXALTS a nation (Prov. 13:34), truth shall set FREE (John 8:32), LIBERTY is found where the spirit of the Lord exists (II Cor. 3:14), and a people can be destroyed for lack of knowledge (Hosea 4:6). America was once exalted above all nations and revered worldwide, but now she is sinking to the gutter level of a bankrupt beggar. Her citizenry was once independent, hardy and free, but now dependent, insecure and entangled with enslaving debt, choking regulations, required permits and crippling taxes. A people who once feared and trusted their God and thus experienced exhilarating liberty are now required to get a number for their security, believe that the right to travel is a government granted privilege, allow their children to be wards of the state, etc. True destruction through plague, war and economics is now a real possibility for a nation formed by a once "blessed" race. WHY? Because a different gospel is being preached and followed in America! A DISTORTED gospel which produces an easily enslaved and readily controlled people. Karl Marx, whose vision and goal was a world enslaved by government control, called by some Communism and others Socialism, said religion was the opiate of the people. He knew, as do the one worlders today, that to enslave and control a people one must first change their religion. That change has taken place in America, producing a dull, splintered, passive, submitting Christianity that is diametrically opposed to the Christianity of the 1700's that was responsible for the independent free republic called the United States of America. THE PROBLEM IN AMERICA IS THE MINISTERS NO LONGER FOLLOW AND PREACH THE SAME GOSPEL THAT WAS PREACHED DURING THE BIRTH OF AMERICA. To support such a statement one only needs to study accurate history. The following quotes are taken from three different history books and all reveal a different clergy than today (I) From The Chaplains and Clergy of the Revolution by J.T. Headly, page 7-- "Much is said of the intelligence, virtue, and submission to law which characterized our Revolution, while those who refer to it with so much pride forget or at least fail to recognize the fact that the rebellion in New England rested on the pulpits....received its strongest impulse, indeed moral character from it. " Page 15-- "The British were aware of the tremendous influence the clergy wielded in the colonies, and saw with alarm that it was thrown on the side of rebellion. Indeed they were accused of being at the bottom of it.'' (2) From The Christian History of the American Revolution by Verna M. Hall, page 193-- "The clergy of the Revolution. . . They gave the sanction of religion--the highest sanction that can fill the human breast-- to the cause of freedom, the holiest cause that can prompt human effort. They nurtured the idea in the people that God was on their side; and that power, however great would be arrayed in vain against them. No wonder that, in the day of Lexington, there were men who went to the field of slaughter with the same solemn sense of duty with which they entered the house of worship.'' (3) From The Light and the Glory by Peter Marshall and David Manuel, page 257--"Interestingly, in the late seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries, most of New England's ministers were solidly behind the discreet resistance of the colonies. For they firmly believed that acceptance of the Church of England's official doctrine of passive submission to monarchy would be nothing less than a repudiation of all that God had been building in America, ever since He had called them to His new Canaan.'' Page 258--"Their resistance, however, did not go unnoticed. Nearly a century before the Revolution, Charles II's advisors warned him that 'the ministers were preaching freedom ' and urged him either to regulate them or to replace them with Episcopal priests. " (Note that the king understood the need to change the religion in order to control the people. Also remember the government granting and/or removing of tax exempt status is a form of regulating.) Page 291--"Nor were the exhortations of their ministers confined to words. These men did not hesitate to put their own lives on the line. " Page 292--"So numerous, in fact, were the fighting pastors that the Tories referred to them as 'the black regiment, ' and blamed them for much of the resurging zeal of the colonial troops.'' Today's modern, state approved, tax exempt Christianity is quite different than the 1776 model. It has been made more refined and holy and is epitomized by such buzz words and phrases as: charity, forgiveness, meekness, gentleness, love they neighbor, turn the other cheek, render unto Caesar, submit to authority, save souls, God is no respecter of persons, etc. Such words and phrases are in the scriptures, but the scriptures are distorted, twisted, improperly taught and misunderstood by most pulpits today. The result has been a refined, palatable, goody goody religion that fits well within the plans of the one world Neo-Communist conspirators, is tenderly embraced by an effeminate world, and is socially accepted by a Christless, Lawless, Humanistic society. There are some-other buzz words and terms used by the anti- Christ forces, who unfortunately control our media and often negatively influence our government with their money, to describe a socially unacceptable people. A people not embraced by the effeminate nor condoned by the one worlders. These people are painted as a threat to the country's welfare and even monitored by the A.D.L. and sometimes by unrestrained governmental bureaucratic agencies. These people are unacceptable to the Communists, Socialists and lawless and are often labeled FRINGE GROUPS or even HATE GROUPS. The words and terms used to describe them are: SURVIVALISTS, RACISTS, TAX PROTESTERS, MILITANTS, and RIGHTWING EXTREMISTS. But the gospel truth of the matter is these are the very type of people God has honored in the Bible (perhaps there is a reason Communists hate the Bible). In fact, the Bible is about such people, heralding them as heroes and even role models for our children. There will be deceived,, modern, pious Christians who will indignantly say-- "My God doesn't honor and condone such people!" Truthfully, their God probably doesn't; for they are following a different God than the God of the Bible, failing to heed the words of Deuteronomy 11:16-- "Beware lest your hearts be deceived and you turn away and serve other Gods and worship them." We shall consider the fringe group, extremist people of the Bible, but first let's again remember that the God of the Christian Bible does not change. He is the same today as yesterday and forever (Hebrews 1:12; 13:8) and he has decreed that sin is sin only if there has been a transgression of His law (I John 3:4). As we consider the people of the Bible, let's also acknowledge the truth of Romans 15:4--"For whatever was written in earlier times was written for our instruction... " The meaning of this verse is self- evident and useful as we consider some of the Bible's heroes. A SURVIVALIST... God told Noah to build an ark. He and all on board the ark were the only ones who escaped the flood alive. GENESIS 6:7 ONE OF THE FIRST HEROES OF THE BIBLE WAS A SURVIVALIST. His name was Noah. He is found in the sixth chapter of Genesis, busy making survival preparations including food, water and a getaway boat. He was in the purest sense of the word a Survivalist. God told Noah to build an ark. He and all on board the ark were the only ones who escaped the flood alive. GENESIS 6:7 The definition of survival is--"the action of living longer than another person or beyond something, the continuation of life or existence in the presence of or despite difficult conditions." Noah wanted to live longer than the rest and was willing to exist under difficult conditions. He could see and understand an impending calamity and did not say, "Oh I just wouldn't want to live if such a thing happened." He didn't foolishly say, "Well I'm paid up and prayed up and ready to go so I'll just sit and wait for a rapture or death." Noah's actions were within the will of God. Being a Survivalist then was not sin nor is it now, for God does not change nor is it a transgression of His law. Remember the only person who does not want you to survive is YOUR ENEMY. It is a sick, distorted religion and society that would condemn or hold in low esteem a Survivalist. I defy anyone to refute this one simple fact--one of the first heroes in the Bible, Noah, was a Survivalist and he found favor in the eyes of the Lord (Genesis 6:8). A RACIST... With a javelin Phinehas killed an Israelite man and a Midianite woman who had committed whoredom. This stopped the plague. NUMBERS 25:7,8 A BIGOT AND A RACIST IS ANOTHER GREAT HERO OF THE BIBLE or at least he would be so labeled by modern standards. His name was Phinehas, a man who understood God's law on interracial marriage and integration. Notice that law from Deuteronomy 7:1-3--"When the Lord your Cod shall bring you into the land where you are entering to possess it, and shall clear away many nations before you, the Hittites and the Girgashites and the Amorites and the Canaanites and the Perizzites and the Hivites and the Jebusites, seven nations greater and stronger than you, and when the Lord your Cod shall deliver them before you and you shall defeat them, then you shall utterly destroy them. You shall make no covenant with them and show no favor to them. Furthermore, you shall not intermarry with them; you shall not give your daughters to their sons, nor shall you take their daughters for your sons. " Perhaps there was an organization in Phinehas' day known as the N.A.A.C.P. (National Association for the Advancement of Canaanite People) who took exception with this teaching of segregation. Perhaps there were pulpits proclaiming a more tolerant and socially accepted view and government agencies crusading for "affirmative action." We really do not know; but we do know from the Bible story in Numbers chapter 25 that the Israel people began to disobey God's law, accept integration, cultural exchange and a type of interracial marriage, and thus were struck collectively by a plague Phinehas was the man who courageously fought against the racial treason even to the point of bloodshed, and he too was honored by God (Numbers 25:6-13). Today, churches would condemn such a Phinehas and accuse him of the sin of racism. But has God changed? Has God's law changed? The definition of racism in Webster's 7th Collegiate Dictionary is--"a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race." In light of such a definition and in light of God's law, how could churches call racism a sin? Racism is a sin in the HUMANIST religion, not in the true Christian faith based upon the Bible. There was a time in America when interracial marriage was against the law and integration was not only socially but religiously unacceptable. In those days, America had no racial problems nor a killing plague such as AIDS. The white Nordic race who settled within her borders knew they were Israel and that the law of their God forbid certain racial interactions. They also knew that because their God loved the world and other races--this did not give them the license to distort His word to comply with the Humanist religion on racial issues. When those people wrote in the preamble of the constitution--"WE THE PEOPLE..." they meant one people. (This fact has been researched an. substantiated by scholarly patriotic men of late). A TAX PROTESTER... Gideon Threshed wheat by the winepress to hide it from the Midianites JUDGES 6:11 A TAX PROTESTER IS ALSO HONORED IN THE BIBLE. His name is Gideon and he is listed as a faith hero in the New Testament book of Hebrews (chapter 11). His story is in Judges chapter 6. Note part of the story in the following Bible quotes found in Judges chapter 6:1-6--"Then the sons of Israel did what was evil in the sight of the Lord and the Lord gave them into the hands of Midian seven years-- For it was when Israel had sown, that the Midianites would come up with the Amalekites and the sons of the east and go against them. So they would camp against them and destroy the produce of the earth as far as Gaza, and leave no sustenance in Israel as well as no sheep, ox or donkey. For they would come up with their livestock and their tents, they would come in like locusts for number, both they and their camels were innumerable; and they came into the land to devastate it. So Israel was brought very low because of Midian. .. "vs. 3-6. "Then the angel of the Lord came and sat under the oak that was in Ophrah, which belonged to Joash the Abiezrite as his son Gideon was beating out wheat in the wine press in order to save it from the Midianites. " vs. 11. This story has a strong parallel to America today. An America invaded by hoards of illegal aliens and sons of the East that bleed a welfare system whose blood bank is the hearts of millions of laboring, overtaxed Americans. Notice in the story that Gideon was hiding his wheat to keep it out of the hands of the Midianites (who perhaps came around every April 15th). Gideon was a tax protester who would today be condemned by Christian pulpits where Romans 13, I Peter 2:13 & 14 and Titus 3:1 is distorted, yet he is placed in both the Old and New Testaments of the Bible as a hero. Such was not the case from the Christian pulpits in 1776. The following quotes of a 1776 sermon were taken from The Chaplains and Clergy of the Revolution, page 10, to illustrate this point: It was for this purpose Samuel West, of Dartmouth, in the election sermon of 1776, took for his text the first verse of the 3rd chapter of Titus, "Put them in mind to be subject to principalities and powers, to obey magistrates, to be ready to every good work." Having thus cleared everything from his path, as he advanced in his argument, he closed it by boldly declaring that "any people, when cruelly oppressed, had a right to throw off the yoke, and be free. " He proved this from the history of the Israelites, quoting the commands of Cod to break the bonds of oppression, and showed that no people ever had a clearer right to rebel from this cause than ourselves. "Does not every one know that the King and Parliament have assumed to tax us without our consent?" "Reason and equity require that no one be obliged to pay the tax that he had never consented to.'' ''But, if they have the right to take our property from us without our consent, we must be wholly at their mercy for food and raiment, and we know, by sad experience, that their tender mercies are cruel." ''It is an indispensable duty, my brethren, which we owe to Cod and our country, to rouse up and bestir ourselves; and being animated with a noble zeal for the sacred cause of liberty, to defend our lives and fortunes to the shedding of the last drop of blood." "We must turn our plow-shares into swords, and our pruning- hooks into spears, and learn the art of self-defense against our enemies. To be careless and remiss, or to neglect the cause of our country through the base motives of avarice or self-interest, will expose us, not only to the resentments of our fellowcreatures, but to the displeasure of Cod of Almighty. For to such base wretches, in such a time as this, we may apply, with the utmost propriety, the passage in Jer. xlviii. 10: 'Cursed he be that doeth the work of the Lord deceitfully, and cursed be he that keepeth back his sword from blood. "' A MILITANT... Samson overcame the enemy by slaying a thousand men with the jawbone of an ass. JUDGES 15:15 MILITANTS ADEPT IN THE ART OF SELF DEFENSE AND WARFARE ARE HERALDED, EXTOLLED AND HONORED ALL THROUGHOUT THE BIBLE. To support this statement, one can choose as an example nearly any Bible hero, as its hard to find one who wasn't proficient in this area. In Hebrews chapter 11 where Godly men of faith are extolled, we read in verse 32-- "And what more shall I say? For time will fail me if I tell of Gideon, Barak, Samson, Jephthah, of David and Samuel and the prophets" The Bible stories concerning these men reveal they were all warriors at one time or another when forced to be. In fact, verse 34 states these men-- "became mighty in war. " What Bible believer can deny this? Samson is just one example, but who can deny he was militant at times and that God blessed his brave and militant feats. Feats that used to be told to Sunday School children throughout America. Certainly no one can deny that Christianity is not a predominately militant faith. It is just the opposite; for Jesus Himself taught in principle it was better to turn the other cheek and to go the second mile. Better to suffer a wrong and endure an insult. That is why our Christian forefathers were willing to even suffer greatly under the rule of a tyrannical King George and fought only as a last resort. (In their case it began on Lexington Green the day the British came to take their guns.) Even in the life of Samson you will find no militant action in his biography until Judges 14:19. It occurred as a result of a conspiracy to defraud him of property. In Judges 15:8, Samson again fights because unGodly authorities murdered his wife and father-inlaw (Judges 15:6). A PARAMILITARIST... Jesus Christ urged his apostles to arm themselves even if they had to sell their garments to do so. LUKE 22 :36 The Bible does not deprive one of the God given right for self defense any more than the law of nature deprives a cornered deer or coyote of the same right. Those laws were created by the God of the Bible and when a she-bear kills to protect her cubs from a kidnapper, she abides within the plans of her creator. Today's passive, state-approved Christianity has so distorted the Gospel that Christian people, in the name of Jesus, havepeacefully stood by and watched their crying children removed from their homes. Such was not the Gospel position of 18th century Christianity. The following quotes taken from a sermon preached to the artillery company in Boston, June 7th, 1773 by Simeon Howard proves the point. (The text was taken from Galatians 5:1--''Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free.''): Every man is bound both by the law of nature and revelation, to provide in the best mannerhe can, for the temporal happiness of his family; and he that neglects this, has, according to the declaration of an inspired apostle, denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel. But in what way can a man be more justly chargeable with this neglect, than by suffering himself to be deprived of his life, liberty or property, when he might lawfully have preserved them? A people who would stand fast in their liberty, should furnish themselves with weapons proper for their defense, and learn the use of them. But since it has been supposed by some that Christianity forbids all violent resisting of evil, or defending ourselves against injuries in such a manner as will hurt, or endanger those who attack us; it may not be amiss to enquire briefly, whether defensive war be not allowed by the gospel of Christ, the Prince of peace. But it is only defensive war that can be justified in the sight of God. When no injury is offered us, we have no right to molest others. And Christian meekness, patience and forbearance, are duties that ought to be practiced both by kingdoms and individuals. Small injuries, that are not likely to be attended with any very pernicious consequences, are rather to be submitted to, than assisted by the sword. An innocent people threatened with war are not always obliged to receive the first attack.--This may frequently prove fatal, or occasion an irreparable damage. When others have sufficiently manifested an injurious or hostile intention, and persist in it, notwithstanding all the admonition and remonstrance we can make, we may, in order to avoid the blow they are meditating against us, begin the assault. The following quote comes from The Chaplains and Clergy of the Revolution.--There, too, was the amiable and learned Payson, of Chelsea. He was so adverse to bloodshed and all the horrors of war that he had felt it his duty to preach patience and even submission. His bolder and more resolute brethren near him took such umbrage at this that they refused to let him preach in their pulpits. They wanted no conciliatory doctrines taught to their people. The brutal outrage at Lexington transformed this peaceful scholar and meek divine into the fiery, intrepid soldier, and seizing a musket he put himself at the head of a party, and led them forward to the attack. The gentle voice that had so long spoken only words of peace suddenly rung long like that of a prophet of old. A body of British soldiers advancing along the road, he poured into them such a destructive volley that the whole were slain or taken prisoners. He was a man of peace and conciliation, but the first citizen's blood that crimsoned the green sward made a clean sweep of all his arguments and objections, and he entered with his whole soul into the struggle." Why did these Christian men fight and even die in the name of Jesus Christ? Because they didn't follow a distorted Gospel as exists today. They understood the meaning of Jesus' words in Luke 22:36--''But now...let him who has no sword sell his robe and buy one.''They knew a sword in Jesus' day was equivalent to a flintlock in their day or an M-16 in our day), thus they knew it was their Christian duty not only to own one, but be able to use one. Also, they knew who they were as can be evidenced by the following words of the 1773 proclamation of the town of Marlborough: "Death is more eligible than slavery. A freeborn people are not required by the religion of Jesus Christ to submit to tyranny, but may make use of such power as God has given them to recover and support their laws and liberties. . .[[we] implore the Ruler above the skies, that He would make bare His arm in defense of His Church and people, and let ISRAEL GO. " Notice those Americans knew they (not the Jews) were the Israel people of scripture; obviously they had not heard today's distorted Gospel. They knew they had descended from Abraham, who was himself a militant man when he had to be (Genesis 14:14). RIGHT-WING EXTREMISTS... Because Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego refused to bow down to the king's golden Image, they were thrown into the fiery furnace. DANIEL Lastly, let it be said that RIGHT-WING EXTREMISTS ARE FOUND AS HEROES OF THE BIBLE. Their names are Shadrach, Meshach and Abednego, found in Daniel chapter 3 defying the highest authority in the land, KING NEBUCHADNEZZAR. The King had decreed that all bow to hiscreation and threatened dire punishment to those who would dare refuse his decree. All obeyed the new additional government regulation except these three extremists. It was these three God honored. Today's distorted Christianity would tell them to bow, to submit, to obey, to be good slaves. These men would be viewed not only as extremists but as sinners by a humanistic religion often called Judeo Christianity. To a humanist, man decides right and wrong and is thus God and thus sovereign. Collectively, men become the state and thus to a humanist the state is sovereign and to be obeyed as God. The Christianity of the 1700's knew the Bible taught-- "He that ruleth over men must be just, ruling in the fear of God.''--II Sam. 23:3. Even the Anglican Church, who supported King George and stood to gain from the suppression of American resistance, had men of conscience attempt to stop the King from unlimited sovereignty. In 1774, Jonathan Shipley, Bishop of Saint Asaph, spoke these words in the House of Lords: ''We pursue a vain phantom of unlimited sovereignty which was not made for men, and unlimited reject the solid advantages of a moderate, useful and intelligent authority. '' In Boston, preacher Jonathan Mayhew preached these words in two sermons: ''It is blasphemy to call tyrants and oppressors God's ministers... When (magistrates) rob and ruin the public, instead of being guardians of its peace and welfare, they immediately cease to be the ordinance and ministers of God, and no more deserve that glorious character than common pirates and highwaymen.'' "The king is as much bound by his oath not to infringe the legal rights of the people, as the people are bound to yield subjection to him. From whence it follows that as soon as the prince sets himself up above the law, he loses the king in the tyrant. He does, to all intents and purposes, un-king himself by acting out of and beyond that sphere which the constitution allows him to move in, and in such cases he had no more right to be obeyed than any inferior officer who acts beyond his commission. The subject's obligation to allegiance then ceases, and to resist him is no more rebellion than to resist any foreign invader...it is making use of the means, and foreignthe only means, which God has put into their power for mutual and self-defense. " The Light and The Glory, page 264. Today, in America, new bureaucratic agencies and officers from O.S.H.A. to dog catchers are continually created and unconstitutional Communistic regulations require Americans not to bow, but to file, report, register, pay, submit, remit, buckle up, get a sticker, take a test, touch your nose, etc. Those Christian people who attempt to regain the inalienable God given right protected by the constitution are often made to feel unspiritual and unchristian by pious churches spreading a distorted gospel. Yet God has not changed and it was He who gave, for our learning, the story of three radicals standing in the name of their God when all others bowed. IN CONCLUSION--Christians in America need to be aware there are those who would distort the gospel to their own end, yea who must distort the gospel if that end is enslavement and one world government. Let it also be acknowledged that said distortions have taken place over such a long period of time that many sincere ministers are preaching a Christian faith as they learned it, little realizing the truths of this writing. It has been known for decades there is an anti-Christ power and force bent on destroying the Republic of the United States of America and enslaving an unsuspecting passive populace. During much of this time public attention has been focused on a unsuspecting potential outside threat while inside true corruption and destruction has been going on. Liberties have been insidiously eroded by runaway bureaucracy and private property has been confiscated by taxes and an unlawful debt usury system much more all with the aid and abet of a new type of Christianity. Those powers are now so strong that it threatens, thru grand juries, government harassment and media slander, men who would dare write the stark truths contained herein. This tactic is not new, as can be seen from the following quote from The Christian History of the American Revolution-- "The Tories censure, in a very illiberal manner, the preacher who speaks boldly for the liberties of the people, while they lavish their praises on him who dares to teach the absurd doctrine, that magistrates have a divine right to do wrong, and are to be implicitly obeyed.'' Because such threatening powers exist, it needs to be said that it is not the purpose of this writing to advocate a revolution and overthrow, for that was done in 1776. It is the purpose of this writing to encourage Christian people to stand for truth and righteousness and liberty so that the courageous Christian deeds of 1776 will not have been in vain. It is not the purpose of this writing to promote or advocate violence, but rather to stir a Christian people to such a stance that none would dare provoke violence. This writing is to present the truth of God's word and to expose a false and evil humanistic, Judeo-Christian, dangerous theology which attempts to malign and destroy Godly SURVIVALISTS, RACISTS, TAX PROTESTERS, MILITANTS and RIGHT WING EXTREMISTS. "These things I have spoken to you, that you may be kept from stumbling. They will make you outcasts from the SYNAGOGUE (emphasis added), but an hour is coming for everyone who kills you to think that he is offering service to God. And these things they will do, because they have not known the father, or me."-- John 16:2
  3. "Thou shalt not commit adultery"

    Thank you brother. I might be filling my mind with the wrong information, that is always a danger I face every day. Jesus studied the law. I also need to recieve the commandments correctly or have a firm grasp on them so that I can love God with all my heart and all my soul. The racial aspects of the LAW contained in scripture are part of the "whole" of scripture and perhaps I am only seeing this as the main assault on my brothers and sisters. I am genuinely concerned and passionate about my kindred peoples and seeing their inheritance being snatched away from them by nothing more than fear of political correctness and false teachers. In doing so I neglect myself perhaps, from knowing and getting closer to God. I understand your warning. I very much appreciate you saying what you have and I will take it on board. Im hungry for knowledge as well which takes over sometimes. Dan
  4. Statue being removed

    I agree. The truth has nothing to fear from scrutiny, nothing at all. Censorship is to lead in the opposite direction. Wilful ignorance or cognitive dissonance is the great earthly curriculum. Be on guard. By their fruits ye shall know them.
  5. "Thou shalt not commit adultery"

    The writer also puts foward that the flood was not universal (suggesting post flood non adamic nations) ?
  6. "Thou shalt not commit adultery"

    The origin of the name Cush is irretrievably obscure, and none of the translators have more to say about it than that it is related to Ethiopia and to perhaps having a dark countenance. The prophet Jeremiah rhetorically asks, "Can the Cushite change his skin?" (Jeremiah 13:23), which may or may not suggest that the Cushites were known for being black. Still, this says very little about the meaning of the name Cush.
  7. Statue being removed

    Exodus 20:4
  8. "Thou shalt not commit adultery"

    The curse occurs in the book of genesis and concerns Noah's drunkenness and the accompanying shameful act perpetrated by his son Ham, the father of Canaan (Gen. 9:20–27 Has Ham (the father of Cush) lost his inheritence? A clue is given "as seeing his fathers nakedness". Leviticus 18:7 King James Version (KJV) 7 The nakedness of thy father, or the nakedness of thy mother, shalt thou not uncover: she is thy mother; thou shalt not uncover her nakedness. It has been suggested that since Noah was drunk at the time in his tent and on account of marriage "two become one in the flesh" He uncovered his mothers nakedness also: "Canaan, Moab, and Ammon were the consequence of incest." To determine if Cush is a black person will require closer look at scripture. On the face of it I have not found anyhting that determines Cush by black skin color so far. I am reading this link from the same website as bible commentary to try and understand your question. http://www.hope-of-israel.org/TableofNations.html
  9. "Thou shalt not commit adultery"

    Yes. I have read this too. Noah was also given the duty to collect and preserve. The days of Noah are referred to pre and post flood in the bible and are both connected by common factors signified. (Genesis 6:5). Verses 11 and 12 say, “Now the earth was corrupt in God’s sight, and the earth was filled with violence. And God saw the earth, and behold, it was corrupt, for all flesh had corrupted their way on the earth.” However, “Noah found favor in the eyes of the Lord” (verse 8). ....... Matthew 24:37-39 New English Translation (NET Bible) 37 For just like the days of Noah were, so the coming of the Son of Man will be. 38 For in those days before the flood, people were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day Noah entered the ark.39 And they knew nothing until the flood came and took them all away. It will be the same at the coming of the Son of Man.
  10. Statue being removed

    Must of caused offence to the mayor and his family or the wider community.
  11. first post and introduction

    Thank you both
  12. "Thou shalt not commit adultery"

    Im not sure to be honest, I have quite some study to do in the hope of being brought up to date. The problem I have found is (being reletively new to bible studies) is not everyone is reading from one complete and agreed source, in faith we are but denominations and languages and opinions are differing on key points. The main problem for me so far is knowing how to approach the topics (like this one and others) regarding "racial pedigree" contained within the bible while in the over saturation of the politically correct realm of internet censorship. It should not matter as long as we have a sincere (of heart) regard for truth and it can be discussed for that reason....we all have an oportunity to learn, drop heresy and biblical error and share or disseminate what is true. Right..... Cush! Ive put that on my study list now. Need to study the post flood lineage in detail. Noah was " perfect in his generation" is the first clue as he was chosen to father who would later become (Jacob) Israel.
  13. "Thou shalt not commit adultery"

    Boaz and Ruth Ruth, a resident of Moab, is identified five times as a Moabitess in Ruth 1:22, 2:2, 2:21, 4:5, and 4:10. Once again, even if Ruth were a racial Moabite, she was not from another race. The Moabites were descendants of Abraham’s nephew Lot (Genesis 12:5) through his incestuous relationship with his eldest daughter: Only one race is represented in Boaz and Ruth’s marriage. In fact, there is no reason to even conclude that Ruth was a racial Moabite. She could not have been a racial Moabite for the same reason that Rahab could not have been a racial Canaanite: the Israelites were forbidden to intermarry with the Moabites. It was for this very reason that Ezra commanded the Judahites to put away their Moabite companions: Had Ruth been a racial Moabite, Boaz would have been required to put Ruth away, if he had even married her in the first place. Ruth must have been known as a Moabite because she had lived in the country of Moab, a possession of the Reubenites at that time. Evidence that Ruth was a Moabite by residence rather than by physical descent was demonstrated when Boaz applied the levirate law to her. The levirate law requires Israelite men to raise up a male heir for a deceased kinsman, in order to preserve his name and estate: Had Ruth been from the forbidden lineage of Moab or from another race, the levirate law would not have applied because her previous relationship with Boaz’s kinsman Mahlon would have been unlawful and, therefore, adulterous. Had Ruth been a racial Moabite, the nearer kinsman (Ruth 3:12, 4:5-6) would have only needed to raise this objection to keep from having to redeem Ruth along with Mahlon’s land. Ruth must have been an Israelite, or at least a descendant of a racially alike lineage with whom the Israelites were permitted to marry. Otherwise, Mahlon’s estate, in part or in whole, would have been lost to a non-Israelite descendant, which was one of the reasons that prompted Ezra to command the Judahites to put away their Moabite and other foreign wives in Ezra 9:1 - 10:3. For the point under discussion, it does not make any difference whether Ruth was an Israelite or a Moabite. In either instance, she was of the same race as Boaz her husband. Salmon and Rahab Rahab is often alleged to be the Canaanite who helped the two Israelites spies escape from Jericho. There is no conclusive proof, however, that the Rahab who helped the Israelite spies in Joshua 2 is the same woman Salmon married, or that she was even of Canaanite descent. Rahab is never identified as a Canaanite. Although she lived in the Canaanite city of Jericho, it is speculation to identify her as a Canaanite from this fact alone. As an example, Moses, who was unquestionably an Israelite, was identified as an Egyptian by the daughters of Reuel: Moses was known as an Egyptian, not because he came from the loins of the Egyptians, but because he came from the land of Egypt. Because Rahab is listed in the book of Hebrews -- in the Hebrew hall of fame no less (Hebrews 11:31) -- she was very possibly an Israelite slave who resided in Jericho (Numbers 21:1). This could perhaps explain why the two Israelite spies sought her out and also why the king of Jericho suspected her of harboring them (Joshua 2:1-3). It makes no difference whether the Rahab from Jericho was a Canaanite. Even if Rahab were a racial Canaanite, two races were not represented in Salmon’s marriage to Rahab. As already established, the Canaanites, although a forbidden lineage, were descendants of Ham, the brother of Shem who was a progenitor of the Israelites. Rahab and Salmon were from the same race and, therefore, their marriage was not interracial.
  14. Abraham Had No...

    Edit: Oral tradition. Racial awareness. Fear of God, Knew who God was. Has the Spirit which was breathed into Adam by God and passed onto Abraham...all of which set these people apart as a unique people which became self evident as time went on.
  15. "Thou shalt not commit adultery"

    Hi HisFirst:) Yes. God did not have a problem with that union because according to the link in the first message the writer addresses this union and shows they were both infact from the SAME race. Do you think the writer has got this part of scripture wrong? If so Why? Moses and Zipporah Only one race is represented in the marriage of Moses and Zipporah. Moses was a descendant of Abraham, an Israelite from the tribe of Levi. Zipporah was a Midianite, a descendant from Abraham through his wife Keturah’s fourth son Midian:
×