Scott Free

Or the Biden Administration will place something terrible at Trumps feet that will mar his presidency. This is the last act of America's dominance. The rest of the world is moving on and will not tolerate an out of touch U.S. desperately holding back the grand unification of Eurasia. The locus of control is shifting, this is obvious when you see past the propaganda.

"This was the 'attack' prearranged for show between Iran and the Biden administration through backchannels. " Article: Jewish News Syndicate

Research papers and studies in general do not make it to Google search. If you use the Google Scholar browser more useful information will be presented. My assumption is his reference to a 'star' is a predictable nova event. Seen in the day by the whole world as a result of a high energy event. Or it is a cryptic message concerning the nuclear terrorism of Revelation 18:10. I actually favor the Biblical reference.

Could be. The Antichrist made these claims 40 years ago before we knew about Betelgeuse situation. I believe he is a con artist and a predictable supernova is more in his ballpark.

The Ort cloud survey started in 2013. That is ten years of data with no results. It is claimed to be a gas giant a little smaller than Neptune. I would not consider such a thing would have any relevance to the Bibles reference to the "signs and wonders" of the Antichrist.

Exposing the Antichrist is an act of rebellion against him. The Antichrist is requiring international media and world leaders to keep quiet about him for the Day of Declaration. Christianity is not at the center of his emergence and he lays claim the eschatology of all the major religions. I can call him other names from other religions, but the designation of Maitreya reveals the most.

The Babylonian myth of Niribu does not denote a physical origin. The spiritual domain and starry space were synonymous to them. Our modern concept of grey aliens stems from a famous Victorian Age occultist describing a demon guide. The alien religion source material is from Babylonian creation myth and modern occultist. The Antichrist promotes such beliefs but in this case he is using something else for public acknowledgement that is rooted in the Abrahamic faiths.

This event is caused by a white dwarf absorbing a red giant star. The modern Nibiru hypophysis is based on faulty selective data of comet orbits. The myriad of sky surveys would of revealed such a Earth sized planet by now. The appearance of a celestial event adds weight to an ethos and is mandatory to be taken seriously by the global religions. Also, this is a Luciferian imitation if the celestial prophecy(Rev. 12) that heralded the birth of Jesus Christ.

The information is too crazy distorted by his followers for clear references with examples of surveillance drone lights and rocket exhaust spirals. He simply said there would be a reappearing of the Star of Bethlehem. I disliked this post and deleted it. If curious see: Maitreya's star "the one whose coming springs from the power of Satan in every mighty deed and in signs and wonders that lie, and in every wicked deceit for those who are perishing because they have not accepted the love of truth so that they may be saved. Therefore, God is sending them a deceiving power so that they may believe the lie, that all who have not believed the truth but have approved wrongdoing may be condemned." 2 Thessalonians 2:9-12

That is something to guard against. But I would not call that gay attraction necessarily, it is actually something more sinister that is being presented to you. Run away with all your might and do not look back. Know that God will always be there to take your hand if you trip.

Right on. Their offense is like gossamer that blows away, obscured then soon forgotten.

In Christ do we have freedom or adherence to the Law? Why should we regard someone who judges us by appearance alone?

In addition, Eve's story reads different when read in Hebrew. The word used for 'rib' means 'half.' The same word is used the describe the two poles that hold up the Ark and the two massive doors at the entrance of the Temple. It seems we are simply being told God made a duplicate using Adam as the source template. Also, Eve was described as Adams rescuer.

If Adam is a type of Christ the following comparison is plausible. Jesus is basically a special birth designed to create a new race of beings from a preexisting lesser species. Could the mud in Adams creation simply be God referencing living earthly things in general? Similar how the Spirit compares the nations to dust or the sea with humanity.

It seems a being needs God's direct intervention to become another being, but it is plausible that Lucifer is incorporating other entities into his being through his ethos. In that all fallen angles are collectively be called Satan. "...You give life to everything, and the multitudes of heaven worship you." Nehemiah 9:6 "...for you created all things, and by your will they were created and have their being.” Revelation 4:11 "For as the body is one and has many members, but all the members of that one body, being many, are one body, so also is Christ. For by one Spirit we were all baptized into one body—whether Jews or Greeks, whether slaves or free—and have all been made to drink into one Spirit" 1 Corinthians 12:12-13 "...he was thrown down to the earth, and his angels were thrown down with him." Revelation 12:9

“Now if the ministry that brought death, which was engraved in letters on stone, came with glory, so that the Israelites could not look steadily at the face of Moses because of its glory, transitory though it was, will not the ministry of the Spirit be even more glorious? If the ministry that brought condemnation was glorious, how much more glorious is the ministry that brings righteousness! For what was glorious has no glory now in comparison with the surpassing glory. And if what was transitory came with glory, how much greater is the glory of that which lasts! Therefore, since we have such a hope, we are very bold. We are not like Moses, who would put a veil over his face to prevent the Israelite's from seeing the end of what was passing away. But their minds were made dull, for to this day the same veil remains when the old covenant is read. It has not been removed, because only in Christ is it taken away. Even to this day when Moses is read, a veil covers their hearts. But whenever anyone turns to the Lord, the veil is taken away. Now the Lord is the Spirit, and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is freedom. And we all, who with unveiled faces contemplate[a] the Lord’s glory, are being transformed into his image with ever-increasing glory, which comes from the Lord, who is the Spirit.” 2 Corinthians 3:7-18

That is true. I guess I am just talking about the difference in the complexity of law among fringe extremist groups.

The Jewish ultra-orthodoxy was more oppressive than Sharia law is today?

Agreed. The Law does play an essential role in creating a stable civilization for the Jews. Could you imagine Christianity having a Sanhedrin dictating the application of the Law? Paul did the right thing by upstaging James in questioning the continued viability of the Torah.

The post N.Y.C., S.C.O., Maitreya and Pope in Prophecy has information that can enhance your awareness of the situation. Stay strong.

Armageddon happens at the very tail end of the Tribulation in response to Christ's decent. This is something different that happens right before the first Antichrist. His kingdom is built on the ashes of another superpower based on consumerism, luxury and perversion. The city that is the source appears to be destroyed by nuclear fire and remaining population base is devoured by famine, invasion and scorched earth. I will cite biblical sources if you desire.

Paul basically gave us the Christianity we have today. If it was up to James we would still be obligated to the Law. It is Paul's version of the new covenant that we are following. He derived this by declaring the Old Testament ways were the ministry of death and their prophecy was partial and incomplete associating the Torah with the reasoning of a child. Was is absolutely necessary for us to learn our ABC's? Yes

This difference in viewing the Old Testament between James and Paul gave us this little gem of contradiction. "You see that a person is justified by works and not by faith alone." James 2:24 "For we hold that one is justified by faith apart from works of the law." Rom. 3:28

I realized something interesting. The debate between taking the Old Testament literal or being open to interpretation was the same argument James and Paul had. Paul objected to James(who became the leader of the Church of Jerusalem) making Christianity an extension of Judaism. James wanted to adhere to the commands of the Prophets, while Paul thought we had outgrown their precepts and have something more mature in Christ. Does the following sound familiar? (James)"We also have the word of the prophets as confirmed beyond doubt. And you will do well to pay attention to it, as to a lamp shining in a dark place, until the day dawns and the morning star rises in your hearts. Above all, you must understand that no prophecy of Scripture comes from one’s own interpretation. For no such prophecy was ever brought forth by the will of man, but men spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit.…" 2 Peter 1:19-20 (Paul)"For we now know in part and we prophesy in part, but when the perfect comes, the partial will pass away. When I was a child, I spoke like a child, I thought like a child, I reasoned like a child. When I became a man, I gave up childish ways. Now we see but a dim reflection as in a mirror; then we shall see face to face. Now I know in part; then I shall know fully, even as I am fully known.… " 1 Corinthians 13:9–12