omega2xx

I am going to address this link at the end of this post.

He did not give any evidence. He just cited some examples he believed are true,and since you also believe, you took what he said as evidence. This reaffirms You have no idea what constitutes verifiable evidence. You are the one with a preconceived idea. You refuse to use how the language is used because of it. Since the sun had not been created at that time, what was the light?

Because you are completely ignorant o f what constitutes evidence and also of even basic genetics, continuing this discussion is a waste of time. Go to ICR, study what they say and maybe you will l earn something. Have a nice day.

The evolutionist also need to have an answer for the origin of the chemicals they claimed are the origin of life. They would have us believe they just popped in to the universe and nothing was their origin. Evolution is one of he most absurd ideas man has come up with and it certainly is not based on real science. Evolution has no answer for what is he origin of life. How can nothing be the origin of something? What are the finding that support natural selection? Just another unscientific invention of the evolutionists.

Mutations can't be the mechanism for change of species and you can't offer any evidence they can be.

Science has proved many things on which they all agree. Would you like to see some examples? BTW a few weeks ago I ask you to post some evidence Wise presented in some of his writings, and to date you have not responded. Have you finally figured out what real evidence is and now know he did not offer any? oor are you just unable to find any?