Jump to content

Wonderer

Members
  • Posts

    4
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

0 Neutral

1 Follower

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://www.abarim-publications.com

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling
  • Location
    Leiden, the Netherlands
  • Interests
    Quantum mechanics, Chaos theory, Scriptures!

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Hi MrHumanSoul You wrote: I have come to many of the same conclutions You have? Yes! I'm NOT the only one! You: its true math has the inability to define infinity , or have the ability to explain the Whole Truth, always to be an aproximation. this issue is part of a fundemental principle in science that the laws of science are not the observations, and that experiments are all ways innacurate. And isn't that totally amazing? Man's bowed down for her golden calf all over again, and knows it too for crying out loud. Probably because man thinks there's no alternative. But there is. I think people like you and me should tell the world this. You: anyway, making a conclution that humans can only perseive "fuzzy "Truth... Actually, a logical system (because it is 'more accurate' than creation) can only represent Truth fuzzily. But humans certainly can know Truth; through love. Love doesn't demand an explanatory description such as math, science and philosophy offer, but a simple and unconditional surrender to the one you adore and possibly a cosy fire, red wine and some sweet whispers and snogliwoglies and those kinds of goings on. We should enjoy God not through a religion but through a relation, not through anything carved out in marble, precious metals or ink, but THROUGH THE GROOVE, BABY! You: do you think that all your conclutions reflect an attribute of the Truth(GOD) to be of non-duelistic nature? Er, scuze me? If I understand your question correctly, I'd say yes, as in no; a non-dualistic nature. But hold on, wait a minute. This is getting way too complicated. The Oxford dictionary lists three kinds of dualism: 1) the theory that mind and matter exist as separate entities; This I doubt, and in fact disprove by Scriptures. Everything that has been made, has been made in the beginning; it just needed to be assembled. The way I understand the universe, life is the fullness of matter and mind is the fullness of life, and it all has to do with electromagnetism. (And though visible light is a mere crescent of the entire electromagnetic palette, scientifically less formal publications often synonymize light and electromagnetism, especially since its quantum--the smallest bit of it--is the photon, or literally, the light-particle. When Jesus says, 'I am the Light,' He is probably not kidding, and quantum electrodynamics should be a required course at every seminary). 2) the doctrine that there are two conflicting powers, good and evil, in the universe; This one I strongly oppose. The devil is no counter part or counter pole to God. God is sovereign and the devil isn't. The Biblical reality model is a mono-polar one, with God as the central nucleus and all other stuff in 'orbit' around Him. The other, very famous model, is the Zoroastrian model, which indeed describes reality as being pulled by two somewhat equal forces, good and bad. Obviously, I am more comfortable with the Biblical model. 3) the doctrine that Christ had two natures, human and divine This is a tricky one. Sure, Jesus is both human and divine, but the conclusion that this requires two natures (a human one and a divine one) goes against the whole idea. In Christ, humanity and divinity meet, like two lines crossing in a Cartesian system. It's one point, even though this one point sits on two lines. Likewise, Christ only has one nature, His nature; where the nature of God and the nature of man coincide. You wrote: do you think supersymitry, unified field, the equalibrium in wave mechanics, convey an aspect of the Whole Truth. Hmm, another tricky one. Truth is One, and does not consist of parts (like facts or theories and stuff). All those beautiful theories (including Christian dogma) are like pictures from an anatomy book, which may help you understand someone to some degree, but will not familiarize you with the personhood that one. And in human interactions its the personhood that counts, and that can not be divided. Imagine feeling the sudden urge to introduce your new girl friend to your parents, and you decide to show them a picture of your girl friend's smiling face. You could insist that it is really her, and confide that you now have introduced your girl friend to your parents. But in fact, you haven't. You've shown them a piece of paper that doesn't laugh, sound, smell (!), speak or interacts like your girl friend does. But now the other way around. If your parents already KNOW your girl friend (as she works a register at the local supermarket) but your parents can't figure out which of the thirty-four check-out girls you are talking about so excitedly, it would surely help to show them the picture. Ah! So THAT's her! They'll say. Likewise science and God. If you got God, science will remind you of Him and explain things about Him. If you don't have God, science will do nothing for you save entertain you a bit. You: Budhism and Toa seem to embody this thinking more so than dualistic nature of Truth as percieved by mainstream christian doctrine. I'm not sure if mainstream christian doctrine endorses any kind of dualistic nature, except perhaps that of Christ, which is dubious in itself. But if you mean your average Bible-belt, pink-cloud, Jesus-loves-me, Frank E. Peretti kind of sub-christian yahoo, yes, unfortunately a lot of bi-polar nonsense has sadly crept into the crypts and vaults of our contemporary 'christian' culture. I visited a humongous christian bookstore in Tennessee last year and tried to find a common, unembellished NIV or NAS and a Hebrew dictionary, but there weren't any. In stead the store displayed an amazing etalage of blessed base balls, flasks of genuine Jordan River water (complete with a smidge of genuine Jordan River mud), women's devotional bibles, men's fellowship Bibles, serendipity Bibles (I had to look that word up; it means: "A supposed talent for the making of happy and unexpected discoveries by accident or when looking for something else; such a discovery," and that while the Bible speaks of the purposeful guidance of the Holy Spirit, and Godly plans, and salvation not by merits of works and certainly not by one's careful observation or accident), bracelets, caps, towels, diaries, post cards, socks; all with WWJD stamped on it like something contagious (as if we should wonder what Jesus would do, while He would have taken a sharp right a hundred miles ago. We are in desperate trouble and ought to wonder What Is Jesus Doing to get us out of this), year-round Christmas stables (while Jesus was born in a house in Bethlehem; not in a stable), monstrous posters of Christ looking like an ancient Back Street Boy (while, according to Isaiah He wasn't all that hot to look at; it's not in the appearance, after all--see the Second Commandment), shelves full of books on How To Biblically Overcome Whatever, Stop Smoking With Jesus, How To Deal With Your Wife The Way Christ Would Have If He Ever Had Had One, Make Tons Of Money The Biblical Way, How The End Time Will Do You In Something Awful UNLESS You Buy This Book, Biblical Banter For Beginners, Race Through The Old Testament In A Year, Why Bill Gates Is The Antichrist, What We Are To Do About Marilyn Manson, What Jesus Really Meant To Say, porcelain simulacra of pathetic angles, holding lyre, obscure books, singing gold music tones that physically dangled over their silver aureolea, precious moments of all derisory sorts, fish for on your bumper, coffee mugs with fish, fish to droop from your neck, your wrist, brochettes, crosses (the most horrible single image man has come up with do date) to adorn walls, ears, necks, buildings, pictures of eagles, pictures of donkeys, pictures of people praying, singing, dancing, holding hands, holding babies up to gentle beams of mercy streaming in from above; all buldging and pounding in the zealous effort to turn my Father's House into a den of robbers. In addition to looking for a Bible and some sense, I began to look for a two-fold cord. Lucky for all of us, I couldn't detect one. It is, after all, not my place to judge these things. But I decided that if this is christianity, I am not christian. I do, however, firmly believe in Jesus Christ, and can only hope that the religion that bears His Name, may one day come to her senses. Jesus one day told the story of the man who gave a feast and invited his most beloved. But every darn one of them had something else to do and declined the pleasure. And so he sent a team of scouts out into the country side, to retrieve the lame and blind who didn't actually or consciously knew him, but who were able to sincerely appreciate his hospitality. I have a dark and fearful feeling that the promise of old may escape contemporary christianity (as a cultural phenomenon) and that the Body of Christ stretches forth throughout all times, cultures and religions, to one day gather at a feast so unimaginably grand, that the attendants abruptly and completely forget who was lame and who was blind, and why exactly. What a God. Wonderer.
  2. Hi Leviathon! I hope your brain has come to itself again, although I was actually hoping that I wrote the introductions to QM and CT manageable enough to be enjoyed by all. But you're right; some of it is hard to swallow. Leviathon wrote: He also has this theory about the mark of the beast being some kind of DNA marker reader or something, an idea which I found fascinating but one which I am absolutely unable to verify. You would be amazed at the amount of theories that are out there on 666 and stuff like that. But I think it's very important that we address these dire issues from a fundament of Scriptures, not our amazing facility to phantasize. I think my approaches stand out from the bulk in that they are part of a water-tight theory, which in turn is based on sound, contemporary science. Actually, it was a big shock to me to find all these congruancies between ancient Scriptures and new science. I remember yelling "O my God! the Bible is true!" on an otherwise uneventful and utterly tranquil day at the library at Gordon Conwell Theological Seminary. Leviathon wrote: The bits on the Koran were different. I know. I was just comfortably condemning the whole of Islam, especially after 9/11, when it occurred to me that the breaking of force-symmetry is repeated in the breaking of the post-Christ belief-symmetry. For a while i hesitated to publish this on my web site, but then I decided to do it anyway and have all the world yell at me. So far I haven't had a lot of yelling to endure; just a lot of curious people who may or may not see the wan onset of global unification shimmer in the dim light of the coming completion. You again: I know this may sound rather mundane to you but I was curious to know what your particular affiliations would be? Nope, doesn't sound mundane. About my affiliations: All I want is to be in the House of the Lord and meditate on His Law for ever (that's from a Psalm, but it applies to me). I will send you the url of my personal testimony through e-mail, because it is too personal to publish. But it might satisfy your curiosity a bit. You: How did you formulate your perspectives, especially about religion and the Bible? Well, one day forgot to take my medication... No, I'm kidding. Growing up I noticed how easily and often people lie and I decided to find Truth. Little did I know that this pelgrimage would lead me around the earth a few times, in the dumps for years, mad and down and out, and then, ever so slowly, into the bossom of the Creator, who once found it fitting to endow me with an insaturable curiosity, a heart for art and a mind for science. And where the three met, I found life. GOD!! I'm so happy! I'm actually near finished with a novel that pretty much describes how the above described journey took place. There are a few samples on the Abarim Publications site; just click on the 'are you a publisher' link. I hope you will find it amusing. In awe, Wonderer
  3. Hey Prime, There's lots on primes on my site also. Wonderer
  4. Hi everyone! If today anyone with a reasonable intelligence and a adequate teacher can familiarise him or herself with models such as the Standard Model, the Hot Big Bang Inflation Model, or theories like relativity and the uncertainty principle, why would Moses not have been able to know these things as he had God for a teacher? It is my pleasure to introduce some revolutionary readings of Genesis, and show that Moses knew. I am looking forward to debating you all and celebrate the majestic truth of Scriptures. Have a look at my website and come right back here! http://www.abarim-publications.com Wonderer
×
×
  • Create New...