Guest HIS girl Posted December 3, 2009 Share Posted December 3, 2009 I watch a clip on u tube that claimed that the coat of arms of Prince Charles contain all the symbols associated with the antichrist. It claims that he is heavily involved with the Freemasons and hopes to be the sovereign of the European Union. What do you think of this idea that he is the antichrist? I have heard that the Royal family (Diana included) are involved in some type of secret religion - whether it's an old form of medieval occultism, I don't know - I also heard it is similar to what Princess Grace from Monaco was involved with.... But this is only what I have heard - I haven't any proof whatsoever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
other one Posted December 3, 2009 Group: Worthy Ministers Followers: 29 Topic Count: 596 Topics Per Day: 0.08 Content Count: 56,098 Content Per Day: 7.56 Reputation: 27,834 Days Won: 271 Joined: 12/29/2003 Status: Offline Share Posted December 3, 2009 I would say from personal experience (which means this is more than likely wrong) that no one takes Prince Charles seriously enough for him to be the AntiChrist. Around here he is just a bit of a joke who people feel sorry for... You really should look a lot closer to his ties to the UN and what the foundations he's head of are doing. How tied into global fasciam he has become and what he does on those trips to Africa. And consider that when the queen dies and he does take the position of king, he will be the head of the Anglican Church and also the head of the top masonic lodge in England if he so chooses. He is extremely involved in setting global fasciest companies through his actions with the UN..... and will have a whole lot of money and influence in the Bank of England Just sitting back out of sight, out of mind doing his thing and slowly getting involved with yours. But the Antichrist....... probably not..... but that little book i mentioned is quite eye opening as to that "bit of a joke outlook" that he has worked so hard to establish. Until the Beast comes from the bottomless pit, we will not know, but I do believe that those of us that are really watching for him will be surprised..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
humbleseeker Posted December 3, 2009 Group: Senior Member Followers: 1 Topic Count: 6 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 519 Content Per Day: 0.10 Reputation: 2 Days Won: 0 Joined: 09/11/2009 Status: Offline Birthday: 04/28/1980 Share Posted December 3, 2009 Nope I dont think so, He will one day be a King that is like the symbal on the caddilac he will have no real power. He will be head of the Freemasons in England. Every country and every state in America have there own Grand lodges with no subjection to England. I beleieve the AntiChrist will be a more subtle man or woman. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick-Parker Posted December 3, 2009 Group: Royal Member Followers: 8 Topic Count: 200 Topics Per Day: 0.23 Content Count: 4,269 Content Per Day: 4.96 Reputation: 1,855 Days Won: 0 Joined: 12/17/2021 Status: Offline Birthday: 06/03/1955 Share Posted December 3, 2009 I watch a clip on u tube that claimed that the coat of arms of Prince Charles contain all the symbols associated with the antichrist. It claims that he is heavily involved with the Freemasons and hopes to be the sovereign of the European Union. What do you think of this idea that he is the antichrist? I have heard that the Royal family (Diana included) are involved in some type of secret religion - whether it's an old form of medieval occultism, I don't know - I also heard it is similar to what Princess Grace from Monaco was involved with.... But this is only what I have heard - I haven't any proof whatsoever. No offense, but this is a classic example of gossip. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bold Believer Posted December 3, 2009 Group: Royal Member Followers: 2 Topic Count: 121 Topics Per Day: 0.02 Content Count: 1,931 Content Per Day: 0.35 Reputation: 126 Days Won: 8 Joined: 01/22/2009 Status: Offline Birthday: 07/13/1955 Share Posted December 3, 2009 The "antichrist" is described in the following scriptures: [Daniel 7:8; 7:20-25; 8:9-12; 8:23-25; 11:36-45; 12:7; Micah 5:5-6 (the "Assyrian"); 2Thessalonians 2:8-9; Revelation 9:11; 11:7; 13:1; 17:8] This entity will first appear in the northern Middle East at the beginning of the Lord's coming hour [time] of trial .... the tribulation period .... he is the Assyrian, the man of lawlessness, the first beast of Revelation Prince Charles is not this entity and this idea is one held by conspiracy theorists ..... not a biblical view at all The verses you quoted DO NOT describe this mythical antichrist at all, Stephen1. These however DO describe the BIBLICAL antichrist. 1Jo 2:18 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest LadyC Posted December 3, 2009 Share Posted December 3, 2009 I would say from personal experience (which means this is more than likely wrong) that no one takes Prince Charles seriously enough for him to be the AntiChrist. Around here he is just a bit of a joke who people feel sorry for... i kinda have to agree with you here. when i first saw the title, i almost spewed my soda. prince charles? really? the antichrist has to be a charasmatic person and almost hypnotic in his effect on people. our own leader fits that description better. (no, i'm not saying obama is the antichrist... but he woud fit the characteristics better than charles.) and that coat of arms? how many thousands of people claim that coat of arms? every family has one. and it's the same one for every person born into that ancestry. so that really means nothing. we aren't likely going to know who the anti-christ is until he makes that 7 year peace treaty. we might be able to venture a good guess prior to that if anyone we're familiar with survives what should be a fatal head wound. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fez Posted December 3, 2009 Group: Royal Member Followers: 3 Topic Count: 683 Topics Per Day: 0.12 Content Count: 11,128 Content Per Day: 2.00 Reputation: 1,352 Days Won: 54 Joined: 02/03/2009 Status: Offline Birthday: 12/07/1952 Share Posted December 3, 2009 So far we have Saddam Hussein the pope Obama Bush Hitler Bob Hope Wayne Gretzki The Iranian Dude The North Korean dude Abbas John Wayne Tiger Woods Mel Blanche and Homer Simpson Perhaps the question is "Who is not the anti-christ?" Prince Charles drinks tea and grows organic cucumbers. I think the opposition is going to be a bit stiffer than that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wyguy Posted December 3, 2009 Group: Royal Member Followers: 1 Topic Count: 373 Topics Per Day: 0.07 Content Count: 3,331 Content Per Day: 0.59 Reputation: 71 Days Won: 10 Joined: 10/15/2008 Status: Offline Birthday: 12/24/1965 Share Posted December 3, 2009 Is Prince Charles of the UK the antichrist? No. My landlord is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AnotherTraveler Posted December 3, 2009 Group: Diamond Member Followers: 1 Topic Count: 80 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 1,595 Content Per Day: 0.22 Reputation: 10 Days Won: 0 Joined: 09/12/2004 Status: Offline Share Posted December 3, 2009 Hmm, Bob Hope and Tiger Woods, golfers huh? Is there a pattern here? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MorningGlory Posted December 3, 2009 Group: Royal Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 1,022 Topics Per Day: 0.16 Content Count: 39,193 Content Per Day: 6.11 Reputation: 9,977 Days Won: 78 Joined: 10/01/2006 Status: Offline Share Posted December 3, 2009 Tiger Woods and John Wayne? I don't know who made up that list but I suspect they're a few stones shy of a pyramid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts