Jump to content
IGNORED

A Discussion on the Temple in Ezekial 40-48


Matthitjah

Recommended Posts

Guest shiloh357
This so far is what I assume you believe:- After the Tribulation, Jesus will return to Earth with every Believer that has ever lived, and He will rule from the Temple at Jerusalem, which will be ministered by those mortal Messianic Jews who have survived the Tribulation, while all the immortal Believers will be given other tasks etc. (maybe a bit like the angels...we might even mingle with them). I would think the Earth will be a fairly crowded place, unless we are here but invisible and in another sort of dimension.
Keep in mind that "every believer who ever lived" may be less than we think. :emot-highfive:

The remaining survivors in the world, although they know Jesus has come back, do not all become Believer's, and they have to present themselves before the L-rd on a yearly? basis.
Actually on a weekly and monthy basis according to Isaiah 66.

When the L-rds government is set up in Jerusalem, and the Temple established, then there will be sin offerings, guilt offerings and burnt offerings, although the sin offerings will done as acts of consecration/purification.
Yes.

I will just stop there and see what we can thrash out together.

Sounds good. I would ask that we actually thrash out what we have record of in Ezekiel. A few of the questions you put to me in earlier posts required me to speculate and give personal opinions about some of what will happen during the millennium, and so we might consider leaving speculations out of the discussion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  76
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  4,492
  • Content Per Day:  0.62
  • Reputation:   191
  • Days Won:  18
  • Joined:  03/29/2004
  • Status:  Offline

I have been reading Ezekiel 40-48 over and over, and could probably now draw from memory an approximation of what the Temple will look like, where its gates are, and the various rooms etc, and I have been praying and mulling over much of what we have only touched on briefly.

I cannot really see how anyone can think this vision is symbolic or representative of anything, because it just doesn't make sense without a literal interpretation...and slowly I am beginning to slough off some of my doubts about certain sacrifices being performed during the coming Millennial period...you will appreciate that for myself, and probably for many others who only dip into Ezekiel, the idea that animals will NEED to be killed in order to be OBEDIENT to the commands of the L-rd, is very difficult to fathom, and my vaguely-formed conclusion at the moment is that G-d requires it as a lesson to surviving Israel of how things could have been if they had been faithful in the first place, and the surviving Jews that now represent the Jewish people, go through the motions of these outward sacrifices, not to placate an angry G-d, but so that they may present a continuous memorial service that honours what the L-rd has done and how He has led them and always loved them.

Thus the only symbolism is what is represented by the sacrifices, and is so that the Jewish nation understand that it has always been the heart that G-d has been interested in, coupled with obedience.

I also believe that G-d is performing what He promised long ago...to be their G-d, and for them to be His people...and that as the Priest-King-Prophet rules and reigns over them, they will take His glory to the ends of the earth, and demonstrate that Yeshua is L-rd above everything.

Bearing in mind that before Jesus returns, the dead will rise, and any that love Him and are alive will also rise and meet Him in the air, I don't quite see how that fits in with the Millennial reign, as it seems to only apply and account for those that are of a physical nature, who will live, marry, have children and die...there is no mention of the resurrected people whatsoever.

A point I would like to try and clarify as well, is that you initially mentioned:-

See, under the Mosaic system, each person had to bring his best animal or he had to purchase an animal that was acceptable. He had to provide his own sacrifice. Under the Mosaic system, you had to bring the animal yourself, and if it were say, a sin offering, you had to confess your sin in order to transfer your sin to the animal.

That is not how it is depicted in Ezekiel. In Ezekiel, no one is bringing any sacrifices to the Temple. No one is transferring his or her sin to an animal. Rather, what we have in Ezekiel is that the Levites are the only ones offering sacrifices. They do it as service of worship and consecration, and not to provide atonement for sin.

and yet it clearly states in Ezekiel 45:17 And it shall be the prince's part to give burnt offerings and meat offerings and drink offerings in the feasts and in the new moons and in the sabbaths in all solemnities of the house of Israel he shall prepare the sin offering and the meat offering and the burnt offering and the peace offerings to make reconciliation for the house of Israel

So to some extent sin offerings for atonement are being carried out....in this case on a national scale, although they may vary from what has taken place under the Mosaic Covenant....which leads to another point.

Do you see another Covenant in operation here, with respect to the Jewish nation...in other words, the Mosaic Covenant has been fulfilled through the eventual and final offering of the L-rd Himself...but here it seems as if another sort of Covenant is being inaugurated where the Shekinah of the L-rd enters by the Eastern gate, to dwell among the sons of Israel forever, and He forgives them, and sets them apart and remains with them forever.(43:7 which also makes one think how is this possible if at some future date Satan will be allowed freedom for a time until his final judgment, and then a New Heaven and a New Earth will appear)

I would ask that we actually thrash out what we have record of in Ezekiel. A few of the questions you put to me in earlier posts required me to speculate and give personal opinions about some of what will happen during the millennium, and so we might consider leaving speculations out of the discussion.

I have never shied away from speculation, as it is often through the discipline and necessity of trying to form inspired opinions, that we are forced to look deeper in the Word, just to confirm if it really says the things mentioned, or indicates their possibility....I think this is especially true of what we find in Ezekiel....I would make a distinction between idle speculation, and what is hopefully sanctified speculation, where one puts down what you think is being said, always being open to correction and better exegesis. Ultimately the revealed things belong to man, and the hidden things remain with the L-rd.

Deut 29:29 The secret things belong unto the LORD our God but those things which are revealed belong unto us and to our children for ever that we may do all the words of this law

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest shiloh357
A point I would like to try and clarify as well, is that you initially mentioned:-

QUOTE

See, under the Mosaic system, each person had to bring his best animal or he had to purchase an animal that was acceptable. He had to provide his own sacrifice. Under the Mosaic system, you had to bring the animal yourself, and if it were say, a sin offering, you had to confess your sin in order to transfer your sin to the animal.

That is not how it is depicted in Ezekiel. In Ezekiel, no one is bringing any sacrifices to the Temple. No one is transferring his or her sin to an animal. Rather, what we have in Ezekiel is that the Levites are the only ones offering sacrifices. They do it as service of worship and consecration, and not to provide atonement for sin.

and yet it clearly states in Ezekiel 45:17 And it shall be the prince's part to give burnt offerings and meat offerings and drink offerings in the feasts and in the new moons and in the sabbaths in all solemnities of the house of Israel he shall prepare the sin offering and the meat offering and the burnt offering and the peace offerings to make reconciliation for the house of Israel

So to some extent sin offerings for atonement are being carried out....in this case on a national scale, although they may vary from what has taken place under the Mosaic Covenant....which leads to another point.

The fact that you have different offerings being mentioned, including burnt offerings, sin offerings, peace offerings, and grain offerings would seem to indicate that this is not an atonement for sin. The passage does not say that he is making atonement for sin through any of those offerings. It simply refers to atonement for the house of Israel. It is my conviction that the use of atonement in connection with these offerings is not referring to expiation, but of consecration. It is obviouly providing a covering given that the Hebrew word "kaphar" is employed by Ezekiel.

I believe that it would contradict Scripture for this to refer to any atonement for man's sin. Hebrews 10 tells us that Jesus has provided, for all time, a single sacrifice for sin and there is no longer any more sacrifice for sin. So, it is my conviction that whatever atonement is provided through the sacrifices mentioned by Ezekiel, that atonement has nothing to do with sin.

Do you see another Covenant in operation here, with respect to the Jewish nation...in other words, the Mosaic Covenant has been fulfilled through the eventual and final offering of the L-rd Himself...but here it seems as if another sort of Covenant is being inaugurated where the Shekinah of the L-rd enters by the Eastern gate, to dwell among the sons of Israel forever, and He forgives them, and sets them apart and remains with them forever.(43:7 which also makes one think how is this possible if at some future date Satan will be allowed freedom for a time until his final judgment, and then a New Heaven and a New Earth will appear)

I am not sure if this answers the question or not, but I do believe that the Abrahamic covenant and the Davidic Covenants are still in force, which are the foundation of Israel's restoration to the Land. The Millennial reign of Christ is a fulfillment of God's unconditional promises to Abraham and David.

I have never shied away from speculation, as it is often through the discipline and necessity of trying to form inspired opinions, that we are forced to look deeper in the Word, just to confirm if it really says the things mentioned, or indicates their possibility....I think this is especially true of what we find in Ezekiel....I would make a distinction between idle speculation, and what is hopefully sanctified speculation, where one puts down what you think is being said, always being open to correction and better exegesis. Ultimately the revealed things belong to man, and the hidden things remain with the L-rd.

I hear that. Good point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  76
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  4,492
  • Content Per Day:  0.62
  • Reputation:   191
  • Days Won:  18
  • Joined:  03/29/2004
  • Status:  Offline

The fact that you have different offerings being mentioned, including burnt offerings, sin offerings, peace offerings, and grain offerings would seem to indicate that this is not an atonement for sin. The passage does not say that he is making atonement for sin through any of those offerings. It simply refers to atonement for the house of Israel. It is my conviction that the use of atonement in connection with these offerings is not referring to expiation, but of consecration. It is obviouly providing a covering given that the Hebrew word "kaphar" is employed by Ezekiel.

I believe that it would contradict Scripture for this to refer to any atonement for man's sin. Hebrews 10 tells us that Jesus has provided, for all time, a single sacrifice for sin and there is no longer any more sacrifice for sin. So, it is my conviction that whatever atonement is provided through the sacrifices mentioned by Ezekiel, that atonement has nothing to do with sin.

I have been giving this some serious thought, and in a sense no sacrifice apart from the Lamb of G-d which took away the sins of the world was either sufficient or acceptable before YHVH, and I wonder if you think it is conceivable that just like David understood that G-d wasn't looking for the multitude of animal sacrifices to appease or please Him, but rather a broken and contrite heart...and yet the sacrifices were a SUBSTITUTE for the Lamb that would actually afford cleansing for the whole world....well in the same way, when the sacrifice system is set up again in Ezekiels Temple, isn't it possible that the sin offering is exactly what it claims to be, but is done in order to demonstrate what our Messiah has accomplished, and is a lesson in reverse, that now looks back and demonstrates to this surviving world, what has been accomplished through Yeshua.

It becomes a lesson, a ritual and a means to understand more fully the significance of all the L-rd has achieved....I suppose a comparison could be made between what is going to be inaugurated then, and what has taken place in such institutions as the L-rds Supper, (although I think it is seldom re-enacted with sufficient understanding to make a worthy comparison) or Believer's baptism...the point being that there is great significance to the setting up of this sacrificial system during this 1000 year period of the L-rds reign on earth...where He will be an actual King and presumably set up a one world government with everything focusing on and around Jerusalem and the Temple.

In particular it seems this whole system is rooted in the system that G-d initiated in divine detail with Moses at Sinai, and G-d will utilise the Jewish people to do things right this time.

I am not sure if this answers the question or not, but I do believe that the Abrahamic covenant and the Davidic Covenants are still in force, which are the foundation of Israel's restoration to the Land. The Millennial reign of Christ is a fulfillment of God's unconditional promises to Abraham and David.

I see what you mean...yes that is kind of where I am at in it all at the moment...I realise that both the Davidic and Abrahamic covenants and still in operation, and it does seem that their fulfillment can only be during this Millenial reign, and will thus fulfill a dual prophesy, of which the Jewish nation can only see the second part at the moment where Messiah reigns as King, because of their blindness in part to the suffering Servant.

QUESTION- What is the main objection to the whole idea of the Millenial reign of the L-rd and the setting up of sacrifices....is it purely that some people say it already occurred at the time of Nehemiah and Ezra, and that others say it is all allegorical? If this is so it doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me, as it cannot have already occured and nothing like it has even been seen because the L-rd, has not reigned on Earth as the King yet. As for being allegorical, as you have already pointed out, and which I agree ther is no indication whatsoever that this is the intent of the text...and its very substance which includes particular attention to details, measurements and duties is too valid a point to dismiss lightly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest shiloh357
I have been giving this some serious thought, and in a sense no sacrifice apart from the Lamb of G-d which took away the sins of the world was either sufficient or acceptable before YHVH, and I wonder if you think it is conceivable that just like David understood that G-d wasn't looking for the multitude of animal sacrifices to appease or please Him, but rather a broken and contrite heart...and yet the sacrifices were a SUBSTITUTE for the Lamb that would actually afford cleansing for the whole world....well in the same way, when the sacrifice system is set up again in Ezekiels Temple, isn't it possible that the sin offering is exactly what it claims to be, but is done in order to demonstrate what our Messiah has accomplished, and is a lesson in reverse, that now looks back and demonstrates to this surviving world, what has been accomplished through Yeshua.

Absolutely. I had made a similar point a few years ago in a thread on this issue. Just as the sacrifices under the Mosaic system looked forward to to the future sacrifice of Christ, the sacrifices in Ezekiel look backward to what has been accomplished.

I had not mentioned that aspect this time around because my purpose thus far has been to demonstrate that firstly, it is not a return to the Mosaic system, and that secondly, the presence of a sin offering is not contradictory to the NT given the various purposes for the sin offering that do not include providing a temporary covering of man's sin.

It becomes a lesson, a ritual and a means to understand more fully the significance of all the L-rd has achieved....I suppose a comparison could be made between what is going to be inaugurated then, and what has taken place in such institutions as the L-rds Supper, (although I think it is seldom re-enacted with sufficient understanding to make a worthy comparison) or Believer's baptism...the point being that there is great significance to the setting up of this sacrificial system during this 1000 year period of the L-rds reign on earth...where He will be an actual King and presumably set up a one world government with everything focusing on and around Jerusalem and the Temple.

In particular it seems this whole system is rooted in the system that G-d initiated in divine detail with Moses at Sinai, and G-d will utilise the Jewish people to do things right this time.

I agree.

QUESTION- What is the main objection to the whole idea of the Millenial reign of the L-rd and the setting up of sacrifices....is it purely that some people say it already occurred at the time of Nehemiah and Ezra, and that others say it is all allegorical? If this is so it doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me, as it cannot have already occured and nothing like it has even been seen because the L-rd, has not reigned on Earth as the King yet. As for being allegorical, as you have already pointed out, and which I agree ther is no indication whatsoever that this is the intent of the text...and its very substance which includes particular attention to details, measurements and duties is too valid a point to dismiss lightly.

Objection to the Millennial reign of Christ and of the sacrifices, differ from person to person. For some, it is just such a foreign idea to the way they were taught, that they reject it completely. For others, it offends theological pride, particularly where Israel is concerned. The establishing of a literal Millenial reign means that God is not done with Israel, and that means that centuries of theology that maintained that biblical Israel was no more and has been replaced with a "new Israel" namely the church, would have been wrong.

Amillenialism, Covenant Theology and Preterism all maintain that there is no prophetic future for biblical Israel, and that we have been living in the Millennial era since the resurrection of Christ. From this perspective, the Old Testament is interpreted in light of the New, so that all of the prophetic blessings God pronoucned on "Israel" in the Old Testament were really about the Church. It should be pointed out that Preterism actually goes further and sees the current church age as the "New Heavens and New Earth."

The problem I see in all of that is that if we are living in the Millennium or in the New Heavens and New Earth right now, as a good friend of mine used to say, "it is the biggest failure in the history of of the world." Given how the Millennium is described and how the New Heavens and New Earth are depicted, something just doesn't add up. If Amillennialism or Preterism were correct in this regard, the world SHOULD be getting better. What we see is a world getting worse and worse. More people in the 20th century died from war, poverty, and disease than ever before.

That is why I look for a prophetic future for Israel. It is the view that makes sense in my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  76
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  4,492
  • Content Per Day:  0.62
  • Reputation:   191
  • Days Won:  18
  • Joined:  03/29/2004
  • Status:  Offline

Shiloh....

1.Why do you think the altar in the Ezekiel Temple was made of wood?

When instructions were given for the altar to be built in the Wilderness, it was naturally to be overlaid with bronze, otherwise it would be burnt up like kindling.

2.How do you think the Millennial kingdom will differ from the Heavenly Kingdom, regarding the Jewish people? Or do you believe that this 1,000 years is specifically so that G-d can be seen to keep His promises, and They have a chance to get things right.

3.I am still unclear what the role of those that been raised from the dead will be during this time.....and what I find hardest to fathom out, isn't just the whole idea of sacrifices, but that we are meant to be raised 'incorruptible' and yet still inhabit a corrupted earth, that still groans and waits its redemption....the two don't match up, because I don't see a transition period.

4.Also I am wondering if the first resurrection involves only the martyrs and over-comers, and these are the Princes that help rule during the 1,000 year period....trying to work out a chronology that is biblically consistent, it not easy. I wonder if we sometimes miss what Scripture says with our systematic theology...just as the Jews with all their learning in the L-rd's day also could not see what was there in front of their eyes.

5.What else do you think is significant about the chapters we are looking at, and is important in how we view this revelation given to Ezekiel....why do we need to know it....how do we relate to it?

................................................................................

.................................................................................

...............

1....Ex 38:1 Then he made the altar of burnt offering of acacia wood, five cubits long, and five cubits wide, square, and three cubits high. 2 He made its horns on its four corners, its horns being of one piece with it, and he overlaid it with bronze.

2....Matt 19:27 Then Peter said to Him,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
Guest shiloh357
1.Why do you think the altar in the Ezekiel Temple was made of wood?
The kind of wood (assuming it is the same as the wood used in tabernacle furniture) speaks to the incorruptable body of Jesus. That is my best guess.

2.How do you think the Millennial kingdom will differ from the Heavenly Kingdom, regarding the Jewish people? Or do you believe that this 1,000 years is specifically so that G-d can be seen to keep His promises, and They have a chance to get things right.
The Millennium is when all of God's promises to Israel will come to pass. The nation of Israel will be finally be set high above all the nations of the world.

3.I am still unclear what the role of those that been raised from the dead will be during this time.....and what I find hardest to fathom out, isn't just the whole idea of sacrifices, but that we are meant to be raised 'incorruptible' and yet still inhabit a corrupted earth, that still groans and waits its redemption....the two don't match up, because I don't see a transition period.
it will be interesting to see how all of that plays out. God has not given us all the light on that issue. I personally believe that we will be reigning with Jesus on the earth sort of as co-regents in different parts of the world. That is just a guess and so please do not hold me to it. :thumbsup:

4.Also I am wondering if the first resurrection involves only the martyrs and over-comers, and these are the Princes that help rule during the 1,000 year period....trying to work out a chronology that is biblically consistent, it not easy. I wonder if we sometimes miss what Scripture says with our systematic theology...just as the Jews with all their learning in the L-rd's day also could not see what was there in front of their eyes.
Well, it goes without saying that our systematic theology is incomplete and is missing a lot of information. Sometimes, people bank too much on theology to the point that they fail to see that theology is only as good as the theologian and that we cannot fill in the gaps with what we don't have. It is best to let these things play out as they will. I am not too concerned about timelines as I know that as a believer, whatever God does, it will be the best thing and we will at that time see the wisdom in it.

.

What else do you think is significant about the chapters we are looking at, and is important in how we view this revelation given to Ezekiel....why do we need to know it....how do we relate to it?
The most significant thing in all of this is that God is keeping His promises to Israel to make them a great nation on earth. To me, that is exciting because it means that I can trust God with those spiritual promises He has made to us a believers pertaining to eternity.

You know, going back to Ezek. 36, God told Israel that He was not doing anything for them because they deserved it, but rather He was doing it for the sake of His Name and to sanctifiy His Name among the nations. God does not bless Israel or us because we are good. He blesses us because He is good. We can trust Him to keep His Word because He magnfies His Word above His own Name according to the pslamist. That is why I love studying this. It is a showcase of God's faithfulness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  76
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  4,492
  • Content Per Day:  0.62
  • Reputation:   191
  • Days Won:  18
  • Joined:  03/29/2004
  • Status:  Offline

Hi Shiloh....I have had a friend on Worthy point out several interesting things to me that I think we have either over-looked or taken for granted right from the get-go...the first was this:-

In the five and twentieth year of our captivity, in the beginning of the year, in the tenth day of the month, in the fourteenth year after that the city was smitten, in the selfsame day the hand of the LORD was upon me, and brought me thither. In the visions of God brought he me into the land of Israel, and set me upon a very high mountain, by which was as the frame of a city on the south. And he brought me thither, and, behold, there was a man, whose appearance was like the appearance of brass, with a line of flax in his hand, and a measuring reed; and he stood in the gate. And the man said unto me, Son of man, behold with thine eyes, and hear with thine ears, and set thine heart upon all that I shall shew thee; for to the intent that I might shew them unto thee art thou brought hither: declare all that thou seest to the house of Israel.

(Eze 40:1-4)

The man speaking to Ezekiel is Jesus. He is the same man who speaks to Ezekiel throughout the entire vision and in 43:7 says:

And he said unto me, Son of man, the place of my throne, and the place of the soles of my feet, where I will dwell in the midst of the children of Israel for ever, and my holy name, shall the house of Israel no more defile, neither they, nor their kings, by their whoredom, nor by the carcases of their kings in their high places.

(Eze 43:7)

So at the outset of this vision, we see that it is a vision that Jesus is revealing to Ezekiel. This is confirmed by other verses such as 44:2, 5, 9, 12, and several other places as well. Ezekiel is taken to a mountain in the Land of Israel and is allowed to see the frame of a city. It is not a city, but it has the structure similar to the city. It is, in fact, a future temple.

When in actual fact it seems much more likely that the individual speaking is an angelic being rather than the L-rd Himself...it doesn't really change the import of the vision, but it better explains the function and ministry of angels as servants of the L-rd who at times interact with humans, albeit in a vision that has been given by G-d to Ezekiel.

The other thing mentioned was that in the resurrection 'there is no giving or taking in marriage '...which raises an interesting question if during this 1,000 year reign, the dead are actually resurrected and mingle with the survivors, they are completely different to them, and it doesn't really make a lot of sense to me as I struggle to see the physical and the spiritual inhabiting the same world...

Matt 22:29 But Jesus answered and said to them,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest shiloh357
When in actual fact it seems much more likely that the individual speaking is an angelic being rather than the L-rd Himself...it doesn't really change the import of the vision, but it better explains the function and ministry of angels as servants of the L-rd who at times interact with humans, albeit in a vision that has been given by G-d to Ezekiel.

What evidence do you find to suggest the man was someone other than Jesus?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  3
  • Topic Count:  366
  • Topics Per Day:  0.05
  • Content Count:  10,933
  • Content Per Day:  1.58
  • Reputation:   212
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  04/21/2005
  • Status:  Offline

Is this discussion concluded?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...