Jump to content
IGNORED

Missouri Pastor Preached On Homosexuality


Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  131
  • Topics Per Day:  0.03
  • Content Count:  2,188
  • Content Per Day:  0.50
  • Reputation:   135
  • Days Won:  8
  • Joined:  04/10/2012
  • Status:  Offline

http://now.msn.com/r...ch-with-a-twist

(quote)

This Missouri pastor's speech on homosexuality ends with a twist

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 25
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  131
  • Topics Per Day:  0.03
  • Content Count:  2,188
  • Content Per Day:  0.50
  • Reputation:   135
  • Days Won:  8
  • Joined:  04/10/2012
  • Status:  Offline

That was bold... and saying , Gods' judgement upon our land.

He spoke truth ... even if he got his notes , misplaced at the end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

  • Group:  Servant
  • Followers:  25
  • Topic Count:  275
  • Topics Per Day:  0.05
  • Content Count:  5,208
  • Content Per Day:  1.00
  • Reputation:   1,893
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  01/02/2010
  • Status:  Offline

This guy was trying to equate people who are anti-gay marriage with people who were pro-segregation. Common tactic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  4
  • Topic Count:  764
  • Topics Per Day:  0.18
  • Content Count:  7,626
  • Content Per Day:  1.82
  • Reputation:   1,559
  • Days Won:  44
  • Joined:  10/03/2012
  • Status:  Offline

I knew something was up when he was making a sustained religious argument in front of a secular city council in a country with "Separation of Church and State." His argument is invalid. And, it was good to see that hardly anyone applauded him.

I checked out his church's website and it doesn't meet even my loosest definition of "Christian." Their statement of beliefs openly invites people to not confine their faith to Jesus. It goes down hill from there.

I agree Eisleben. A very poor excuse for a church. Phil Snider is a big proponent of the Emergent Church movement and a poster child for post-modernism.

http://brentwoodchristianchurch.wordpress.com/welcome/staff/

From: http://brentwoodchristianchurch.wordpress.com/welcome/beliefs/

Many Disciples like to say their faith is “defined by Jesus, but not necessarily confined to Jesus.”

I don't think this can be considered a Christian Church.

God bless,

GE

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  4
  • Topic Count:  764
  • Topics Per Day:  0.18
  • Content Count:  7,626
  • Content Per Day:  1.82
  • Reputation:   1,559
  • Days Won:  44
  • Joined:  10/03/2012
  • Status:  Offline

This guy was trying to equate people who are anti-gay marriage with people who were pro-segregation. Common tactic.

Common tactic yet it get's attention... I wonder why?

The arguments aginst same-sex marraige do sound very much like the arguments used against interracial marriage not long ago.

This is the second time in a thread you've brought this up RunningGator as a "valid" argument regarding segregation and homosexuality. What's your point?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Diamond Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  200
  • Topics Per Day:  0.04
  • Content Count:  1,602
  • Content Per Day:  0.30
  • Reputation:   291
  • Days Won:  8
  • Joined:  10/24/2009
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  01/01/1986

RG, if two homosexual friends of yours, wanted to get married, and asked you if it was a good idea, what would you say?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  4
  • Topic Count:  764
  • Topics Per Day:  0.18
  • Content Count:  7,626
  • Content Per Day:  1.82
  • Reputation:   1,559
  • Days Won:  44
  • Joined:  10/03/2012
  • Status:  Offline

Apparently the United Church of Christ, Evangelical Lutheran Church of America, The Disciples of Christ, and the Episcopalian Church are all approved by Phil Snider… Interesting.

I just think this was a publicity stunt by Phil Snider.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  4
  • Topic Count:  764
  • Topics Per Day:  0.18
  • Content Count:  7,626
  • Content Per Day:  1.82
  • Reputation:   1,559
  • Days Won:  44
  • Joined:  10/03/2012
  • Status:  Offline

I believe that if homosexuals could get the benefits of being married without it being called a marriage, 95% of marriage talk would cease.

I would tend to agree Ruck. :thumbsup: Problem is that most people who are pro-homosexual wouldn't stand for it being called anything else IMO. :hmmm:

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Diamond Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  200
  • Topics Per Day:  0.04
  • Content Count:  1,602
  • Content Per Day:  0.30
  • Reputation:   291
  • Days Won:  8
  • Joined:  10/24/2009
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  01/01/1986

Let me ask you, if two homosexuals that you knew came to you and said “on what legal, non-religious basis do you think you have the right to tell me who to marry”, what would you say?

DOMA

Even though the Obama administration refuses to enforce this law.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Diamond Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  200
  • Topics Per Day:  0.04
  • Content Count:  1,602
  • Content Per Day:  0.30
  • Reputation:   291
  • Days Won:  8
  • Joined:  10/24/2009
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  01/01/1986

Let me ask you, if two homosexuals that you knew came to you and said “on what legal, non-religious basis do you think you have the right to tell me who to marry”, what would you say?

DOMA

Even though the Obama administration refuses to enforce this law.

that does not really answer the question.

what is the legal basis that DOMA stands on?

Yes it does answer the question. That's the legal reason why two homosexuals should not be allowed to marry. Just because Obama's Justice dept. refuses to enforce this law does not make it any less valid.

The legal basis for DOMA is it is a Federal law passed by both houses that has not been rescinded.

You may not agree with the law, but that does not make it any less a law of the land.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...