WorthyNewsBot Posted November 27, 2012 Group: Bots Followers: 3 Topic Count: 39,879 Topics Per Day: 6.47 Content Count: 44,258 Content Per Day: 7.18 Reputation: 984 Days Won: 2 Joined: 06/06/2007 Status: Offline Share Posted November 27, 2012 Under fire from congressional critics, U.S. ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice stressed in a Tuesday statement that she did not intend to mislead the public about the September 11th attacks on the Benghazi consulate.http://www.worthynews.com/top/politico-com-politico44-2012-11-rice-we-didnt-intend-to-mislead-on-benghazi-150400-html/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajunluvie Posted November 28, 2012 Group: Advanced Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 2 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 221 Content Per Day: 0.05 Reputation: 6 Days Won: 0 Joined: 10/06/2011 Status: Offline Share Posted November 28, 2012 Oh please! Give me a break! I've been following this and it insults my intelligence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldShep Posted November 28, 2012 Group: Diamond Member Followers: 1 Topic Count: 20 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 934 Content Per Day: 0.20 Reputation: 137 Days Won: 6 Joined: 07/20/2011 Status: Offline Birthday: 02/12/1950 Share Posted November 28, 2012 It is my view that this issue just shows us the need to verify one's sources before opening mouth. Like finding weapons of mass destruction when there were....how many were really found? People seem pressured to answer the media's questions, when what is really needed is a quest for the facts behind any event before telling the world what you "think" happened. I do not believe she, did this to hide the truth or mislead the people. In the heat of battle things happen fast and it is hard to back off and see the whole picture of an event. Her failure is one of timing, opening mouth before the dust of truth had the time to settle. In plain lingo, she was a "dumb bunny " for opening her mouth in the first place, she did not know all the facts. Dennis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest shiloh357 Posted November 29, 2012 Share Posted November 29, 2012 UN Sec. Rice was a tool. They sent her out with false information that they knew was false. Whether she knew it was false or not, the point is that the Adminstration knew within hours that it was a terrorist attack that was coordinated and had nothing to do with a video. Let's just assume Rice had no idea that she was spreading wrong information. That the Adminstration knew and sent her out to desiminate something known to be false should insult her. She has been used to promote a lie, and if she didn't know it wasn't false, then she should feel like she was used and it shows a lot of disrespect toward her that they thought she could be used as fodder for the media in this way. I mean, where is the outrage that she might have been used by the Adminstration as a useful idiot? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LOVE SONGS Posted November 29, 2012 Group: Royal Member Followers: 1 Topic Count: 131 Topics Per Day: 0.03 Content Count: 2,188 Content Per Day: 0.50 Reputation: 135 Days Won: 8 Joined: 04/10/2012 Status: Offline Share Posted November 29, 2012 name='shiloh357' timestamp='1354151617' post='1891042'] UN Sec. Rice was a tool. They sent her out with false information that they knew was false. Whether she knew it was false or not, the point is that the Adminstration knew within hours that it was a terrorist attack that was coordinated and had nothing to do with a video. Let's just assume Rice had no idea that she was spreading wrong information. That the Adminstration knew and sent her out to desiminate something known to be false should insult her. She has been used to promote a lie, and if she didn't know it wasn't false, then she should feel like she was used and it shows a lot of disrespect toward her that they thought she could be used as fodder for the media in this way. I mean, where is the outrage that she might have been used by the Adminstration as a useful idiot? You are right shiloh ... seems she was used...becuase todays' news on it. The CIA altered, edited the report . But, the officals don't know as of yet why. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LOVE SONGS Posted November 29, 2012 Group: Royal Member Followers: 1 Topic Count: 131 Topics Per Day: 0.03 Content Count: 2,188 Content Per Day: 0.50 Reputation: 135 Days Won: 8 Joined: 04/10/2012 Status: Offline Share Posted November 29, 2012 This is from the news article ; editing the report. (quote) "CIA officials contacted us and indicated that Acting Director Morell misspoke in our earlier meeting. The CIA now says that it deleted the al-Qaeda references, not the FBI. They were unable to give a reason as to why," Graham and two other Republican senators said in a statement on Tuesday. hum..someone is in trouble perhaps ... removing al-qaeda about all this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest shiloh357 Posted November 29, 2012 Share Posted November 29, 2012 name='shiloh357' timestamp='1354151617' post='1891042'] UN Sec. Rice was a tool. They sent her out with false information that they knew was false. Whether she knew it was false or not, the point is that the Adminstration knew within hours that it was a terrorist attack that was coordinated and had nothing to do with a video. Let's just assume Rice had no idea that she was spreading wrong information. That the Adminstration knew and sent her out to desiminate something known to be false should insult her. She has been used to promote a lie, and if she didn't know it wasn't false, then she should feel like she was used and it shows a lot of disrespect toward her that they thought she could be used as fodder for the media in this way. I mean, where is the outrage that she might have been used by the Adminstration as a useful idiot? You are right shiloh ... seems she was used...becuase todays' news on it. The CIA altered, edited the report . But, the officals don't know as of yet why. Well I can say this. It shows why it is always good idea to independently verify something before going out on nationwide TV and allow yourself to be made a laughingstock. She should have sought independent verification and made sure that all relevant sources for the information agreed on what was being said and it wouldn't be a bad idea to get it in writing. I find it hard to believe that the UN Ambassador wouldn't have enough sense to cover her own rear end on this before going on TV with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LOVE SONGS Posted November 30, 2012 Group: Royal Member Followers: 1 Topic Count: 131 Topics Per Day: 0.03 Content Count: 2,188 Content Per Day: 0.50 Reputation: 135 Days Won: 8 Joined: 04/10/2012 Status: Offline Share Posted November 30, 2012 name='shiloh357' timestamp='1354151617' post='1891042'] UN Sec. Rice was a tool. They sent her out with false information that they knew was false. Whether she knew it was false or not, the point is that the Adminstration knew within hours that it was a terrorist attack that was coordinated and had nothing to do with a video. Let's just assume Rice had no idea that she was spreading wrong information. That the Adminstration knew and sent her out to desiminate something known to be false should insult her. She has been used to promote a lie, and if she didn't know it wasn't false, then she should feel like she was used and it shows a lot of disrespect toward her that they thought she could be used as fodder for the media in this way. I mean, where is the outrage that she might have been used by the Adminstration as a useful idiot? You are right shiloh ... seems she was used...becuase todays' news on it. The CIA altered, edited the report . But, the officals don't know as of yet why. Well I can say this. It shows why it is always good idea to independently verify something before going out on nationwide TV and allow yourself to be made a laughingstock. She should have sought independent verification and made sure that all relevant sources for the information agreed on what was being said and it wouldn't be a bad idea to get it in writing. I find it hard to believe that the UN Ambassador wouldn't have enough sense to cover her own rear end on this before going on TV with it. The thing is ...they edited it to make it seem it was the film that was behind the attack. The CIA hid the fact it was al-qaeda terrorist. Because ... the ambassador Stevens in August was asking for help saying al-qaeda was all over the place over there in Benghazi. 50 others in the middle east said they knew it was terrorist from al-qaeda. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts