MarkNigro Posted August 7, 2013 Group: Advanced Member Followers: 1 Topic Count: 12 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 428 Content Per Day: 0.11 Reputation: 61 Days Won: 3 Joined: 07/10/2013 Status: Offline Share Posted August 7, 2013 So you would tell the Jews who disagree with you that they don't know how to read their own texts? Or I guess I would have to tell the others Jews who believe in 6000 years that they are wrong. This is a spiritual thing, not a reading comprehension issue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarkNigro Posted August 7, 2013 Group: Advanced Member Followers: 1 Topic Count: 12 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 428 Content Per Day: 0.11 Reputation: 61 Days Won: 3 Joined: 07/10/2013 Status: Offline Share Posted August 7, 2013 This is a spiritual thing, not a reading comprehension issue. Exactly! So is the origin of the universe. It is a spiritual thing. You either believe in the Almighty God the Creator who can do everything and who plainly tells the truth and can be believed. Or you believe in a lie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sculelos Posted August 23, 2013 Group: Members Followers: 1 Topic Count: 6 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 49 Content Per Day: 0.01 Reputation: 5 Days Won: 0 Joined: 08/13/2013 Status: Offline Share Posted August 23, 2013 Hi Thomas all real scientific and historical factual data shows that our Earth is almost exactly 5801 years of Age. (Using Years of 365.250625015625) The reason Science is so far off this number in their dating sequence is because they ignore equilibrium. What equilibrium is, is a energy decay so that the more time goes on the faster we build up radioactive decay. I've shown before how this number can be significantly off making the age of the Universe change from 5801 years to 13.77 Billion years if ignored. However ignoring Equilibrium is easier I suppose then facing the truth of a young Earth as the last thing they want to do with the 'Advancing' of Science is go back to a Biblically supported Model. They would rather invent many Ad Hoc Solutions to avoid the infallible truth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ninevite Posted August 23, 2013 Group: Advanced Member Followers: 1 Topic Count: 3 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 127 Content Per Day: 0.03 Reputation: 14 Days Won: 0 Joined: 08/14/2013 Status: Offline Birthday: 02/02/1980 Share Posted August 23, 2013 So you would tell the Jews who disagree with you that they don't know how to read their own texts? Are you implying that all Jews believe your junk science? Many of them do not, what do you propose we tell them? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ninevite Posted August 23, 2013 Group: Advanced Member Followers: 1 Topic Count: 3 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 127 Content Per Day: 0.03 Reputation: 14 Days Won: 0 Joined: 08/14/2013 Status: Offline Birthday: 02/02/1980 Share Posted August 23, 2013 (edited) What's interesting to me is that the Genesis creation account, which was written by Jews and for Jews, is understood by most modern Jews to not be indicative of young-earth creationism. And what did the Jews of antiquity believe? What did Abraham, Isaac and Jacob believe? What did Moses believe? Edited August 23, 2013 by Ninevite Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobbyPants Posted August 27, 2013 Group: Removed from Forums for Breaking Terms of Service Followers: 1 Topic Count: 1 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 166 Content Per Day: 0.04 Reputation: 15 Days Won: 0 Joined: 08/27/2013 Status: Offline Share Posted August 27, 2013 Paul tells us the whole universe is 'wearing out.' Even light velocity has slowed something like 8% (I think it is) in the last 200 years! Rates of radioactive decay may not have been static throughout the ages either...... I have not heard either of these two points before. Do you have a source? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.7803ec9e3f1e9eeba0a93e6ebdacb0e3.jpg)
Recommended Posts