Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  

A Sleeping Giant: The Hidden Side Effect of Medicaid

Recommended Posts


As Medicaid enrollments increase due to people signing up for Obamacare there is a little known consequence lurking and the public will be caught unaware and unprepared. It is a sleeping giant called MERP.

Do you know what the Federal MERP laws are and how they can affect you and those around you? The Federal Medicaid laws which are in effect in most states require each state to have a Medicaid Estate Recovery Program (MERP).  (This is not to be confused with the Medical Expense Reimbursement Plan which is any plan or arrangement under which a business reimburses an employee for out-of-pocket medical expenses incurred by employees or their dependents.)  The states all have a Department of Aging and Disability Services which manages the MERP – Medicaid Estate Recovery Program. Under MERP the states may file a claim against the estate of a deceased Medicaid recipient. The cost of services, prescriptions, and hospital care can all be claimed by the state they reside in. Come January 2014  Obamacare expands Medicaid eligibility to include all families at or below 133% of the poverty level. There is going to be a significant increase in the number of Medicaid recipients.

Thanks to OBRA 93 (Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act) passed by congress in 1993 and TEFRA 1982 (Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act) TEFRA liens may be placed on real property in local land recording office.  This prevents the gifting of a home to a non-disabled adult child or any other person before the state can file a claim against the property.  Considering how much money is put out by states to cover the medical expenses of Medicaid recipients perhaps it is justified. However what if your health insurance carrier came after your home upon your death when you wanted your children to inherit it. Now how can that seem right?

When an individual has a private health insurance company, the company is paid premiums which offset the expense of insuring individuals.  When that individual dies the insurance company will not come take the family home. No one would want to buy health insurance from a company that would come after the estate.

So why is it okay for the government to come after the estate of Medicaid recipients? You might think that it is okay because they do not pay premiums.  Think again. Many, if not most, Medicaid recipients do pay premiums. The amounts they pay are small compared to what middle income individuals pay in premiums for private insurance, yet when compared to their income it is relevant.

With Obamacare the elderly who have been on Medicare will be rolled off of Medicare onto Medicaid.  This is going to have an adverse effect on all Americans as we watch the government take the property of our loved ones as they pass.  It is not just the 90 year old grandfather who won’t be able to leave his house to his grandson; it is the 55 year old dad who got cancer and ended up on Medicaid toward the end who can’t leave it to his healthy thirty year old son. This can be rightly called a “Death Tax.”

Here’s a question for you to ponder? When the government gets in total control of the health care system, will MERP eventually apply to everyone? Now a “Death Tax” is just a little something to think about.









by Reneta Adamson

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • Guest
      By Guest
      Fair Warning: Obamacare Supporters might want to skip this
    • By GoldenEagle
      So came across this today...

      What do you think?
    • By GoldenEagle
      So.. I thought this was a different perspective. I’m not sure I agree but what do you think? Do you see a potential for a stronger job market?

      God bless,
      Edit: Please remember to discuss the subject and not the person. Members who are disrespectful and/or break the ToS will be banned from this thread.
    • By blindwhale
      Fox News recently shed light on the IRS scandals and how the government was targeting political and religious groups financially. My concern is that they may use healthcare to target religious and political groups as well. What the feds can mandate over us is unknown. They could choose to label my religious beliefs as a disorder or mental illness. They can issue vaccinations at a federal level to its citizens. Knowing this is uneasy for I do not fully trust in my government. The wording of the bill is worrisome and it seems much of the actual understanding depends on your interpretation. It's fashioned in a disturbing manner.
      I remember when I was waiting to see if federal healthcare would become legal. The thought of it concerned me and I stressed over it. Finally the day came and it passed for I recall watching the news as the administration celebrated its victory. That night I had a vision through a dream. I felt like I had received a message of warning.
      My dream:
      I dreamed I was dreaming. I woke up from the first dream to find my left foot bleeding. The wound appeared as if though someone had driven a stake through my foot. Then I woke up from the first dream and found myself checking for blood in my bed. There was no blood in my bed. Then I woke from the two dreams and relived the very actions of my previous dream by throwing off my blankets and checking my foot while I was truly awake. I felt alarmed with a sense of urgency.
      Healthcare reform was pushed through by the political left and I find it to be ironic since my left foot bled. My interpretation was that health reform would cause problems for us (a bleeding wound). Then I awake within the dream of the dream to have a great awakening: The wound would heal.
      Can anyone relate or present a different perspective?
    • By The_Patriot2018
      I guess, its great for us, but when it comes to their own employees, even the administrations to cheap for it.