What Happened to the Dinosaurs?

[other one]

 

 

Does somebody actually believe this is some dinosaur fossil foot print from 6000 years ago?

I love this place, keeps me entertained and smiley when I'm all up tight.

 

 

Too funny.  Go debunk the other Monstrous Catalog of Architecture/ Drawings/Pottery... that a child could look @ and without batting an eye say, "Yep, Dinosaur." LOL   But wait..... now we need trained experts to tell us what they really are.  No straining out a gnat to swallow a camel for those guys, I can tell ya.

 

And how about Behemoth?  I especially like those stories of Hippos/Elephants or whatever it is this week....with that tail like a CEDAR and the other descriptors used.  Look up how tall Cedars get in that part of the world.  But maybe GOD was just comparing it to a branch or a sapling.

 

Or Leviathan and Dragons mentioned in Scripture.

 

Or, "the Bible doesn't mention "DINOSAURS"

 

And while your @ it; How about the current "Growing" Catalog of SOFT TISSUE found in these 80-150 million year old fossils (Dino's/other)....But wait, "tissue can survive that long, we're the Experts... you just don't know "Science". 

 

Round and Round we go...."all aboard the a priori adherence train!!  Next Stop, Shang Ra La."

 

 

But it has to be fake.....   cause we all know that there were not dino's and people here at the same time.....   so it has to be something else....

 

I swear if some people moved next door to me I'd burn their house down.....   if they built it back I'd burn my house down...

[ARGOSY]

 

 

 

 

I am not erecting that standard, I was merely using the standard of the one I was replying to.

Where was "proof" mentioned in any previous response that you were responding to?

 

 

Dino's and Man

 

From: http://www.genesispark.com/exhibits/evidence/historical/ancient/dinosaur/

 

Sorry tried to post some Pics of drawings, pottery, and architecture but had some "technical" difficulties.

 

Also, if you ever have an occasion to visit the National Bridges Monument in Utah, ask one of the staff members to explain the presence of an antiquated dinosaur petroglyph @ the base of Kachina Bridge.

 

Its a strange thing that all the most ancient civilizations depicted dinosaurs on their artwork. Here's some examples:

 

The first ever temple, Gobekli Tepe has a stone carving of a cynognathus. Lion? No way.  http://www.openhandweb.org/Gobekli_Tepe%3A_a_key_to_humanity's_history

 An Egyptian tablet depicted two captured dinosaurs     http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narmer_Palette

Stegosaur of Angkor     http://ki-media.blogspot.com/2012/07/preah-khan-temple-mystery-door-of.html

 

Plus thousands more.  I guess evolutionists think each of those is a hoax    

http://www.helsinki.fi/~pjojala/Dinoglyfs.htm

 

 

I am not sure what your links are supposed to show, only the last one has anything that looks like a dinosaur.

 

 

A cynogathus does not look like a dinosaur, but its one of the most common early Triassic predators. Compared to any modern predator, that Gobleki Tepe carving resembles a cynogathus. Its further down the page, its the predator that looks like its crawling down the pole.

A simplified toy version of that dinosaur is virtually a perfect replica of the stone carving:  http://www.angelfire.com/biz/toysoldierhq/zmxpl755.jpg

 

What do you think the Egyptian creatures on the tablet are, those two with the intertwined necks? Look like dinos to me.

 

And thanks for admitting the third one.

 

Plus the fourth link shows many, many more examples. 

Edited January 24, 2014 by ARGOSY

[LookingForAnswers]

 

 

 

 

 

I am not erecting that standard, I was merely using the standard of the one I was replying to.

Where was "proof" mentioned in any previous response that you were responding to?

 

 

Dino's and Man

 

From: http://www.genesispark.com/exhibits/evidence/historical/ancient/dinosaur/

 

Sorry tried to post some Pics of drawings, pottery, and architecture but had some "technical" difficulties.

 

Also, if you ever have an occasion to visit the National Bridges Monument in Utah, ask one of the staff members to explain the presence of an antiquated dinosaur petroglyph @ the base of Kachina Bridge.

 

Its a strange thing that all the most ancient civilizations depicted dinosaurs on their artwork. Here's some examples:

 

The first ever temple, Gobekli Tepe has a stone carving of a cynognathus. Lion? No way.  http://www.openhandweb.org/Gobekli_Tepe%3A_a_key_to_humanity's_history

 An Egyptian tablet depicted two captured dinosaurs     http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narmer_Palette

Stegosaur of Angkor     http://ki-media.blogspot.com/2012/07/preah-khan-temple-mystery-door-of.html

 

Plus thousands more.  I guess evolutionists think each of those is a hoax    

http://www.helsinki.fi/~pjojala/Dinoglyfs.htm

 

 

I am not sure what your links are supposed to show, only the last one has anything that looks like a dinosaur.

 

 

A cynogathus does not look like a dinosaur, but its one of the most common early Triassic predators. Compared to any modern predator, that Gobleki Tepe carving resembles a cynogathus. Its further down the page, its the predator that looks like its crawling down the pole.

A simplified toy version of that dinosaur is virtually a perfect replica of the stone carving:  http://www.angelfire.com/biz/toysoldierhq/zmxpl755.jpg

 

What do you think the Egyptian creatures on the tablet are, those two with the intertwined necks? Look like dinos to me.

 

And thanks for admitting the third one.

 

Plus the fourth link shows many, many more examples. 

 

 

People see what they want to see, most of those look as much like a dinosaur as the burnt toast looked like Jesus. 

[Spock]

Does somebody actually believe this is some dinosaur fossil foot print from 6000 years ago?

I love this place, keeps me entertained and smiley when I'm all up tight.

 

Too funny.  Go debunk the other Monstrous Catalog of Architecture/ Drawings/Pottery... that a child could look @ and without batting an eye say, "Yep, Dinosaur." LOL   But wait..... now we need trained experts to tell us what they really are.  No straining out a gnat to swallow a camel for those guys, I can tell ya.

 

And how about Behemoth?  I especially like those stories of Hippos/Elephants or whatever it is this week....with that tail like a CEDAR and the other descriptors used.  Look up how tall Cedars get in that part of the world.  But maybe GOD was just comparing it to a branch or a sapling.

 

Or Leviathan and Dragons mentioned in Scripture.

 

Or, "the Bible doesn't mention "DINOSAURS"

 

And while your @ it; How about the current "Growing" Catalog of SOFT TISSUE found in these 80-150 million year old fossils (Dino's/other)....But wait, "tissue can survive that long, we're the Experts... you just don't know "Science". 

 

Round and Round we go...."all aboard the a priori adherence train!!  Next Stop, Shang Ra La."

I hear you. To each his or her own but I do believe most intelligent seeking people would be deterred from examine the bible if they thought they had to believe the universe was 6,000 years old or that man and dinosaur hung out together.

I don't care if the "intelligent" mock me when it comes to Noah's arc or Jonah being swallowed by a big fish (that is clear in the bible), but I'm not going to try to convince a seeking unbeliever the former two items we have discussed ( not clearly spelled out at all, not to mention goes against a preponderance of scientific testimony).

So my advice to you seeker LFA, is to don't judge the bible on these topics, but rather the claims of who Jesus Christ is?

Love you my friend,

Spock

[Enoch2021]

 

 

Does somebody actually believe this is some dinosaur fossil foot print from 6000 years ago?

I love this place, keeps me entertained and smiley when I'm all up tight.

 

Too funny.  Go debunk the other Monstrous Catalog of Architecture/ Drawings/Pottery... that a child could look @ and without batting an eye say, "Yep, Dinosaur." LOL   But wait..... now we need trained experts to tell us what they really are.  No straining out a gnat to swallow a camel for those guys, I can tell ya.

 

And how about Behemoth?  I especially like those stories of Hippos/Elephants or whatever it is this week....with that tail like a CEDAR and the other descriptors used.  Look up how tall Cedars get in that part of the world.  But maybe GOD was just comparing it to a branch or a sapling.

 

Or Leviathan and Dragons mentioned in Scripture.

 

Or, "the Bible doesn't mention "DINOSAURS"

 

And while your @ it; How about the current "Growing" Catalog of SOFT TISSUE found in these 80-150 million year old fossils (Dino's/other)....But wait, "tissue can survive that long, we're the Experts... you just don't know "Science". 

 

Round and Round we go...."all aboard the a priori adherence train!!  Next Stop, Shang Ra La."

I hear you. To each his or her own but I do believe most intelligent seeking people would be deterred from examine the bible if they thought they had to believe the universe was 6,000 years old or that man and dinosaur hung out together.

I don't care if the "intelligent" mock me when it comes to Noah's arc or Jonah being swallowed by a big fish (that is clear in the bible), but I'm not going to try to convince a seeking unbeliever the former two items we have discussed ( not clearly spelled out at all, not to mention goes against a preponderance of scientific testimony).

So my advice to you seeker LFA, is to don't judge the bible on these topics, but rather the claims of who Jesus Christ is?

Love you my friend,

Spock

 

 

"examine the bible if they thought they had to believe the universe was 6,000 years old or that man and dinosaur hung out together."

 

Well it's because they been conditioned and Bombarded from Diapers from all angles (media, school, "church") with "Peoples" a priori conviction that the Earth is _______ and Dinosaurs are_______  Over and Over and Over again.  "If you tell a lie long enough"....... someone once said.

 

They can't see it.  But the Holy Spirit Can!!!!!!

 

I may be wrong here but........I tell people the TRUTH and then I SUPPORT IT.  That's my JOB as I see it.....the SAVING comes from GOD and the HOLY SPIRIT. 

[LookingForAnswers]

You tell people your view of the truth...which may or may not coincide with reality.

[ARGOSY]

 

 

 

 

 

 

I am not erecting that standard, I was merely using the standard of the one I was replying to.

Where was "proof" mentioned in any previous response that you were responding to?

 

 

Dino's and Man

 

From: http://www.genesispark.com/exhibits/evidence/historical/ancient/dinosaur/

 

Sorry tried to post some Pics of drawings, pottery, and architecture but had some "technical" difficulties.

 

Also, if you ever have an occasion to visit the National Bridges Monument in Utah, ask one of the staff members to explain the presence of an antiquated dinosaur petroglyph @ the base of Kachina Bridge.

 

Its a strange thing that all the most ancient civilizations depicted dinosaurs on their artwork. Here's some examples:

 

The first ever temple, Gobekli Tepe has a stone carving of a cynognathus. Lion? No way.  http://www.openhandweb.org/Gobekli_Tepe%3A_a_key_to_humanity's_history

 An Egyptian tablet depicted two captured dinosaurs     http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narmer_Palette

Stegosaur of Angkor     http://ki-media.blogspot.com/2012/07/preah-khan-temple-mystery-door-of.html

 

Plus thousands more.  I guess evolutionists think each of those is a hoax    

http://www.helsinki.fi/~pjojala/Dinoglyfs.htm

 

 

I am not sure what your links are supposed to show, only the last one has anything that looks like a dinosaur.

 

 

A cynogathus does not look like a dinosaur, but its one of the most common early Triassic predators. Compared to any modern predator, that Gobleki Tepe carving resembles a cynogathus. Its further down the page, its the predator that looks like its crawling down the pole.

A simplified toy version of that dinosaur is virtually a perfect replica of the stone carving:  http://www.angelfire.com/biz/toysoldierhq/zmxpl755.jpg

 

What do you think the Egyptian creatures on the tablet are, those two with the intertwined necks? Look like dinos to me.

 

And thanks for admitting the third one.

 

Plus the fourth link shows many, many more examples. 

 

 

People see what they want to see, most of those look as much like a dinosaur as the burnt toast looked like Jesus. 

 

 

 

that's fine.  The neutrals who follow this discussion will see that you are under emphasizing the resemblance and make their own judgment. By not facing what is obvious you are helping the creationist cause. 

[JustinM]

The 4th link was very interesting and it was very informative to me, when you outlined case after case of massive floods occurring all over the world.  I've always believed in the New Earth Theory, but now I can use this information to better support it when I discuss it with skeptics.

 

LFA, what answers are you looking for here?  Because, it doesn't look like you are looking for anything but affirmation of your own beliefs.  No one here is an expert on every subject that comes up.  But, we try hard to make a strong case for our faith and beliefs.

[LookingForAnswers]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I am not erecting that standard, I was merely using the standard of the one I was replying to.

Where was "proof" mentioned in any previous response that you were responding to?

 

 

Dino's and Man

 

From: http://www.genesispark.com/exhibits/evidence/historical/ancient/dinosaur/

 

Sorry tried to post some Pics of drawings, pottery, and architecture but had some "technical" difficulties.

 

Also, if you ever have an occasion to visit the National Bridges Monument in Utah, ask one of the staff members to explain the presence of an antiquated dinosaur petroglyph @ the base of Kachina Bridge.

 

Its a strange thing that all the most ancient civilizations depicted dinosaurs on their artwork. Here's some examples:

 

The first ever temple, Gobekli Tepe has a stone carving of a cynognathus. Lion? No way.  http://www.openhandweb.org/Gobekli_Tepe%3A_a_key_to_humanity's_history

 An Egyptian tablet depicted two captured dinosaurs     http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narmer_Palette

Stegosaur of Angkor     http://ki-media.blogspot.com/2012/07/preah-khan-temple-mystery-door-of.html

 

Plus thousands more.  I guess evolutionists think each of those is a hoax    

http://www.helsinki.fi/~pjojala/Dinoglyfs.htm

 

 

I am not sure what your links are supposed to show, only the last one has anything that looks like a dinosaur.

 

 

A cynogathus does not look like a dinosaur, but its one of the most common early Triassic predators. Compared to any modern predator, that Gobleki Tepe carving resembles a cynogathus. Its further down the page, its the predator that looks like its crawling down the pole.

A simplified toy version of that dinosaur is virtually a perfect replica of the stone carving:  http://www.angelfire.com/biz/toysoldierhq/zmxpl755.jpg

 

What do you think the Egyptian creatures on the tablet are, those two with the intertwined necks? Look like dinos to me.

 

And thanks for admitting the third one.

 

Plus the fourth link shows many, many more examples. 

 

 

People see what they want to see, most of those look as much like a dinosaur as the burnt toast looked like Jesus. 

 

 

 

that's fine.  The neutrals who follow this discussion will see that you are under emphasizing the resemblance and make their own judgment. By not facing what is obvious you are helping the creationist cause. 

 

 

Hey, if you look at those and see proof of dinosaurs and man I am happy for you, but don't go getting all bent out of shape because not everyone agrees with you.   While there might be some lurking, there are no neutrals in this discussion, everyone has their mind made up and is out to prove the other person wrong.  Why cant people be happy believing what they believe without trying to make everyone else think like them?

[LookingForAnswers]

The 4th link was very interesting and it was very informative to me, when you outlined case after case of massive floods occurring all over the world.  I've always believed in the New Earth Theory, but now I can use this information to better support it when I discuss it with skeptics.

 

LFA, what answers are you looking for here?  Because, it doesn't look like you are looking for anything but affirmation of your own beliefs.  No one here is an expert on every subject that comes up.  But, we try hard to make a strong case for our faith and beliefs.

 

The answers I am looking for are in the area of faith, not science.  Oddly enough I don't have this desire that the rest of you have to make everything think like you or attack them till they do.  Why not just state your beliefs and accept what other people believe?  Is that really too much to ask?   I happen to believe the earth is more than 6000 years old, why does that raise such fear in those that don't agree with me?