Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
shiloh357

Darwin's Illegitimate Brainchild

46 posts in this topic

The concept of evolution by natural selection is sometimes referred to as Charles Darwin’s brainchild, and indeed he often referred to it in his letters to his friends as his dear ‘child’. However, this is a far cry from the facts. At best it was an adopted child; at worst an illegitimate child.

 

 

 

 

http://creation.com/charles-darwins-illegitimate-brainchild

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The concept of evolution by natural selection is sometimes referred to as Charles Darwin’s brainchild, and indeed he often referred to it in his letters to his friends as his dear ‘child’. However, this is a far cry from the facts. At best it was an adopted child; at worst an illegitimate child.

 

 

 

 

http://creation.com/charles-darwins-illegitimate-brainchild

 

Yes sir!!

 

And did you know Sir, Erasmus Darwin was a FreeMason....Talk about a can of worms.

 

If anyone wishes to Poo Poo this, I suggest reading Morals and Dogma by Albert Pike to get an up close view.  I would Strongly suggest (from personal experience) that if you go any further, that is...start going down rabbit holes, you have and take the FULL ARMOR of GOD (See: Ephesians) with you.

 

That's all I have to say about that.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

:thumbsup:

 

Darwin's Kind Evolving Into Other Kinds

 

And God said, Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb yielding seed, and the fruit tree yielding fruit after his kind, whose seed is in itself, upon the earth: and it was so. And the earth brought forth grass, and herb yielding seed after his kind, and the tree yielding fruit, whose seed was in itself, after his kind: and God saw that it was good. Genesis 1:11-12

 

Is Snickered At By Farmers

 

And God said, Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of the earth after his kind: and it was so. And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was good. Genesis 1:24-25

 

And Other Great Thinkers

 

And God said, Let the waters bring forth abundantly the moving creature that hath life, and fowl that may fly above the earth in the open firmament of heaven. And God created great whales, and every living creature that moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly, after their kind, and every winged fowl after his kind: and God saw that it was good. And God blessed them, saying, Be fruitful, and multiply, and fill the waters in the seas, and let fowl multiply in the earth. Genesis 1:20-22

 

The World Over

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The concept of evolution by natural selection is sometimes referred to as Charles Darwin’s brainchild, and indeed he often referred to it in his letters to his friends as his dear ‘child’. However, this is a far cry from the facts. At best it was an adopted child; at worst an illegitimate child.

 

 

 

 

http://creation.com/charles-darwins-illegitimate-brainchild

How is any child "illegitimate"?  All children are conceived in the same way - no difference among them at all. Why are you disparaging children to try to make a point about a scientific theory with which you disagree?  Sorry, that is a very poor and mean analogy.

Edited by jerryR34
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

The concept of evolution by natural selection is sometimes referred to as Charles Darwin’s brainchild, and indeed he often referred to it in his letters to his friends as his dear ‘child’. However, this is a far cry from the facts. At best it was an adopted child; at worst an illegitimate child.

 

 

 

 

http://creation.com/charles-darwins-illegitimate-brainchild

How is any child "illegitimate"?  All children are conceived in the same way - no difference among them at all. Why are you disparaging children to try to make a point about a scientific theory with which you disagree?  Sorry, that is a very poor and mean analogy.

 

The point is that Darwin took credit for something that he didn't originate.  He was not an honest man.  

3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

The concept of evolution by natural selection is sometimes referred to as Charles Darwin’s brainchild, and indeed he often referred to it in his letters to his friends as his dear ‘child’. However, this is a far cry from the facts. At best it was an adopted child; at worst an illegitimate child.

 

 

 

 

http://creation.com/charles-darwins-illegitimate-brainchild

How is any child "illegitimate"?  All children are conceived in the same way - no difference among them at all. Why are you disparaging children to try to make a point about a scientific theory with which you disagree?  Sorry, that is a very poor and mean analogy.

 

The point is that Darwin took credit for something that he didn't originate.  He was not an honest man.  

 

How does that impact the veracity of the theory of evolution?  There are many discoveries that happened at the same time independently.  Research calculus.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Even if a scientist is a mass murdering pedophile, that would still have zero effect on the veracity of their claims.

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem

sure should make you very cautious about their claims though...

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately, MrsRational has a point with this. If Darwin had not published this, someone else would have published his own version, and we'd be calling it by someone else's last name.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0