Guest shiloh357 Posted January 25, 2014 Share Posted January 25, 2014 The concept of evolution by natural selection is sometimes referred to as Charles Darwin’s brainchild, and indeed he often referred to it in his letters to his friends as his dear ‘child’. However, this is a far cry from the facts. At best it was an adopted child; at worst an illegitimate child. http://creation.com/charles-darwins-illegitimate-brainchild Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enoch2021 Posted January 26, 2014 Group: Royal Member Followers: 11 Topic Count: 19 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 3,396 Content Per Day: 0.91 Reputation: 730 Days Won: 4 Joined: 12/21/2013 Status: Offline Birthday: 12/26/1963 Share Posted January 26, 2014 The concept of evolution by natural selection is sometimes referred to as Charles Darwin’s brainchild, and indeed he often referred to it in his letters to his friends as his dear ‘child’. However, this is a far cry from the facts. At best it was an adopted child; at worst an illegitimate child. http://creation.com/charles-darwins-illegitimate-brainchild Yes sir!! And did you know Sir, Erasmus Darwin was a FreeMason....Talk about a can of worms. If anyone wishes to Poo Poo this, I suggest reading Morals and Dogma by Albert Pike to get an up close view. I would Strongly suggest (from personal experience) that if you go any further, that is...start going down rabbit holes, you have and take the FULL ARMOR of GOD (See: Ephesians) with you. That's all I have to say about that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 26, 2014 Share Posted January 26, 2014 Darwin's Kind Evolving Into Other Kinds And God said, Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb yielding seed, and the fruit tree yielding fruit after his kind, whose seed is in itself, upon the earth: and it was so. And the earth brought forth grass, and herb yielding seed after his kind, and the tree yielding fruit, whose seed was in itself, after his kind: and God saw that it was good. Genesis 1:11-12 Is Snickered At By Farmers And God said, Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of the earth after his kind: and it was so. And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was good. Genesis 1:24-25 And Other Great Thinkers And God said, Let the waters bring forth abundantly the moving creature that hath life, and fowl that may fly above the earth in the open firmament of heaven. And God created great whales, and every living creature that moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly, after their kind, and every winged fowl after his kind: and God saw that it was good. And God blessed them, saying, Be fruitful, and multiply, and fill the waters in the seas, and let fowl multiply in the earth. Genesis 1:20-22 The World Over Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jerryR34 Posted January 27, 2014 Group: Removed from Forums for Breaking Terms of Service Followers: 0 Topic Count: 18 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 588 Content Per Day: 0.16 Reputation: 82 Days Won: 2 Joined: 11/22/2013 Status: Offline Birthday: 11/12/1969 Share Posted January 27, 2014 (edited) The concept of evolution by natural selection is sometimes referred to as Charles Darwin’s brainchild, and indeed he often referred to it in his letters to his friends as his dear ‘child’. However, this is a far cry from the facts. At best it was an adopted child; at worst an illegitimate child. http://creation.com/charles-darwins-illegitimate-brainchild How is any child "illegitimate"? All children are conceived in the same way - no difference among them at all. Why are you disparaging children to try to make a point about a scientific theory with which you disagree? Sorry, that is a very poor and mean analogy. Edited January 27, 2014 by jerryR34 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest shiloh357 Posted January 27, 2014 Share Posted January 27, 2014 The concept of evolution by natural selection is sometimes referred to as Charles Darwin’s brainchild, and indeed he often referred to it in his letters to his friends as his dear ‘child’. However, this is a far cry from the facts. At best it was an adopted child; at worst an illegitimate child. http://creation.com/charles-darwins-illegitimate-brainchild How is any child "illegitimate"? All children are conceived in the same way - no difference among them at all. Why are you disparaging children to try to make a point about a scientific theory with which you disagree? Sorry, that is a very poor and mean analogy. The point is that Darwin took credit for something that he didn't originate. He was not an honest man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jerryR34 Posted January 27, 2014 Group: Removed from Forums for Breaking Terms of Service Followers: 0 Topic Count: 18 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 588 Content Per Day: 0.16 Reputation: 82 Days Won: 2 Joined: 11/22/2013 Status: Offline Birthday: 11/12/1969 Share Posted January 27, 2014 The concept of evolution by natural selection is sometimes referred to as Charles Darwin’s brainchild, and indeed he often referred to it in his letters to his friends as his dear ‘child’. However, this is a far cry from the facts. At best it was an adopted child; at worst an illegitimate child. http://creation.com/charles-darwins-illegitimate-brainchild How is any child "illegitimate"? All children are conceived in the same way - no difference among them at all. Why are you disparaging children to try to make a point about a scientific theory with which you disagree? Sorry, that is a very poor and mean analogy. The point is that Darwin took credit for something that he didn't originate. He was not an honest man. How does that impact the veracity of the theory of evolution? There are many discoveries that happened at the same time independently. Research calculus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrsRational Posted January 29, 2014 Group: Removed from Forums for Breaking Terms of Service Followers: 0 Topic Count: 2 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 150 Content Per Day: 0.04 Reputation: 4 Days Won: 0 Joined: 12/09/2013 Status: Offline Birthday: 06/01/1984 Share Posted January 29, 2014 (edited) Even if a scientist is a mass murdering pedophile, that would still have zero effect on the veracity of their claims. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem Edited January 29, 2014 by MrsRational Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jerryR34 Posted January 29, 2014 Group: Removed from Forums for Breaking Terms of Service Followers: 0 Topic Count: 18 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 588 Content Per Day: 0.16 Reputation: 82 Days Won: 2 Joined: 11/22/2013 Status: Offline Birthday: 11/12/1969 Share Posted January 29, 2014 Even if a scientist is a mass murdering pedophile, that would still have zero effect on the veracity of their claims. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem Very well said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
other one Posted January 29, 2014 Group: Worthy Ministers Followers: 29 Topic Count: 593 Topics Per Day: 0.08 Content Count: 55,875 Content Per Day: 7.55 Reputation: 27,625 Days Won: 271 Joined: 12/29/2003 Status: Offline Share Posted January 29, 2014 Even if a scientist is a mass murdering pedophile, that would still have zero effect on the veracity of their claims. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem sure should make you very cautious about their claims though... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nebula Posted January 29, 2014 Group: Royal Member Followers: 10 Topic Count: 5,823 Topics Per Day: 0.76 Content Count: 45,870 Content Per Day: 5.97 Reputation: 1,897 Days Won: 83 Joined: 03/22/2003 Status: Offline Birthday: 11/19/1970 Share Posted January 29, 2014 Unfortunately, MrsRational has a point with this. If Darwin had not published this, someone else would have published his own version, and we'd be calling it by someone else's last name. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts