Jump to content
IGNORED

obama administration gives away internet


Love is alive

Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Advanced Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  3
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  405
  • Content Per Day:  0.11
  • Reputation:   98
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  02/27/2014
  • Status:  Offline

What fascinates me is that people are actually so naive that they will believe anything that they read.   I find it so mildly amusing...Obama proposes raising taxes on the wealthy, he's A. Socialist B. Communist C. Marxist D. All of them...Reagan proposes raising taxes on the wealthy...silence. He's giving away all our money...where is that?  Oh yes, Obama the king...well here is a clue we have a "do nothing congress" (actually record breaking) and if one will take the time they will find that the President does not have all authority.  (Probably why congress approval ratings are at ground level)  So yes, the President is like the quarterback in football praised when he wins blamed when he loses...forget about the other players on the team.

 

I would suggest that instead of taking "stories" at face value one checks with more reliable sources.  Newsbusters ...next they will tell us that Bat Boy is an Obama agent, and the fox news will do endless follow-ups!

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Worthy Ministers
  • Followers:  29
  • Topic Count:  596
  • Topics Per Day:  0.08
  • Content Count:  56,043
  • Content Per Day:  7.56
  • Reputation:   27,788
  • Days Won:  271
  • Joined:  12/29/2003
  • Status:  Offline

http://dailycaller.com/2012/06/06/ronald-reagan-raised-taxes-11-times-the-real-story/

THATdo nothing congress has passed a huge number of bills.... none of which the democratic senate would even look at.

your comments are offensive.

http://dailycaller.com/2012/06/06/ronald-reagan-raised-taxes-11-times-the-real-story/

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Advanced Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  3
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  405
  • Content Per Day:  0.11
  • Reputation:   98
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  02/27/2014
  • Status:  Offline

other one - that do nothing congress has passed a huge number of bills.... none of which the democratic senate would even look at. your comments are offensive .

 

Certainly there are occasions when the truth is offensive. Check your facts...oh, right it is all the "democratic" senate fault, the house has been working very hard to move this country forward...well, in any direction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Advanced Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  3
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  405
  • Content Per Day:  0.11
  • Reputation:   98
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  02/27/2014
  • Status:  Offline

other one - your comments are offensive.
 
As I mentioned the truth can be offensive. As to the OP and the false story regarding Obama and the internet:
 
http://mediamatters.org/research/2014/03/15/fox-news-falsely-claims-obama-is-giving-the-int/198502
 
 
When you have the time look up "cloture" it would be worth a look.
 
Reagan proposed to increase taxes on the wealthy...
note this is actually Ronald Reagan. 
 

 
Note again the reference to Alan Simpson...a republican.
 
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/03/14/1194062/-10-reasons-why-Ronald-Reagan-would-be-persona-non-grata-at-CPAC-2013#two
 
I think that I will take the word of the Treasury Official under Reagan.
 
“Noah quotes former White House and Treasury official Bruce Bartlett, who served under Reagan and wrote a paper last year on "Reagan's Forgotten Tax Record," demonstrating beyond any doubt that the GOP icon raised taxes at least 10 times during his two terms as president and also during his governorship of California. In that paper, Bartlett destroys the mythology of Reagan, which has been made concrete by the right-wing activist and lobbyist Grover Norquist with the "anti-tax" pledge signed by most Republican politicians.”
 
http://news.yahoo.com/did-reagan-raise-taxes-let-gop-candidates-answer-080000521.html;_ylt=A0LEV7pPryhTCgoAgLwPxQt.;_ylu=X3oDMTByZDBpbXI5BHNlYwNzcgRwb3MDNQRjb2xvA2JmMQR2dGlkAw

Edited by OneLight
removed Youtube link - videos are to be in the video forum only.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Worthy Ministers
  • Followers:  29
  • Topic Count:  596
  • Topics Per Day:  0.08
  • Content Count:  56,043
  • Content Per Day:  7.56
  • Reputation:   27,788
  • Days Won:  271
  • Joined:  12/29/2003
  • Status:  Offline

nuts

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Advanced Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  3
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  405
  • Content Per Day:  0.11
  • Reputation:   98
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  02/27/2014
  • Status:  Offline

other one - nuts

 

bolts

 

But as you can see the story concerning the internet "giveaway" is false...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Worthy Ministers
  • Followers:  29
  • Topic Count:  596
  • Topics Per Day:  0.08
  • Content Count:  56,043
  • Content Per Day:  7.56
  • Reputation:   27,788
  • Days Won:  271
  • Joined:  12/29/2003
  • Status:  Offline

if anyone thinks giving up oversight of the company that assigns domains is not against this country's best intetests, from my personal view they are either naive ignorant or stupid.

whether we call it giving the internet away or something else isn't really important.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Worthy Ministers
  • Followers:  28
  • Topic Count:  338
  • Topics Per Day:  0.05
  • Content Count:  15,696
  • Content Per Day:  2.46
  • Reputation:   8,516
  • Days Won:  39
  • Joined:  10/25/2006
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  02/27/1985

other one - nuts

 

bolts

 

But as you can see the story concerning the internet "giveaway" is false...

 

actually it may not be. That story, did indeed say the internet, was given to a world company. They try to say it wasn't Obama, that it was something that was invisioned from the start. Now, that part maybe true-that may have been something that was invisioned from before Obama, but it doesnt mean Obama didn't push for it, and it is still giving the internet away. a rose by any other name is still a rose. And, if Fox news was accurate-of course the rest of the media is going to call fox news a liar. Fox news is fairly liberal and has a twist to it, but they seem to be the only major news outlet that isnt controlled by the government and has the backbone to tell them to back off, so yes everyone is going to call them a liar. I think Im going to stand with fox news on this one-they are giving the internet away, and Obama had at the very least a big say in the timing of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  7
  • Topic Count:  867
  • Topics Per Day:  0.24
  • Content Count:  7,331
  • Content Per Day:  2.00
  • Reputation:   2,860
  • Days Won:  31
  • Joined:  04/09/2014
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  04/28/1964

What fascinates me is that people are actually so naive that they will believe anything that they read.   I find it so mildly amusing...Obama proposes raising taxes on the wealthy, he's A. Socialist B. Communist C. Marxist D. All of them...Reagan proposes raising taxes on the wealthy...silence. He's giving away all our money...where is that?  Oh yes, Obama the king...well here is a clue we have a "do nothing congress" (actually record breaking) and if one will take the time they will find that the President does not have all authority.  (Probably why congress approval ratings are at ground level)  So yes, the President is like the quarterback in football praised when he wins blamed when he loses...forget about the other players on the team.

 

I would suggest that instead of taking "stories" at face value one checks with more reliable sources.  Newsbusters ...next they will tell us that Bat Boy is an Obama agent, and the fox news will do endless follow-ups!

 

I get my info from a variety of sources and Fox News is rarely one of them. I'm British, we don't get Fox News. I don't trust 'Liberal' news coverage though. That's just me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Diamond Member
  • Followers:  8
  • Topic Count:  2
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  1,146
  • Content Per Day:  0.27
  • Reputation:   732
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  10/30/2012
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  04/10/1950

I'll take Fox news over any other new agency, even my local stations. You know..... We report you decide, Fair and Balanced.  You just have to use your noggin and weigh information out.  One size does not fit all.  :lightbulb2:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...