Donibm Posted March 21, 2014 Group: Removed from Forums for Breaking Terms of Service Followers: 0 Topic Count: 14 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 246 Content Per Day: 0.07 Reputation: 44 Days Won: 0 Joined: 01/11/2014 Status: Offline Birthday: 06/09/1974 Share Posted March 21, 2014 Always remember that when dialoging with opposing religions, atheists and evolutionists. They are riddled in THEORIES. They trust their Professors and trust in the opinions of certain groups. But a theory is a theory is a theory ... it's STILL a theory. A commonly accepted theory ... is still a theory. Carbon dating itself is a THEORY due to all the considerations, like atmosphere, etc. Nothing has a date tag attached to it. That's it. That's all I got for you in this. It's a CORE PRINCIPLE that you all can build upon yourselves. The antichrist will cause them to believe the lie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LookingForAnswers Posted March 21, 2014 Group: Seeker Followers: 0 Topic Count: 10 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 1,033 Content Per Day: 0.27 Reputation: 67 Days Won: 2 Joined: 12/26/2013 Status: Offline Share Posted March 21, 2014 I would add that a convincing argument is still just an argument and compelling evidence is still just evidence...neither of which are proof. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jerryR34 Posted March 21, 2014 Group: Removed from Forums for Breaking Terms of Service Followers: 0 Topic Count: 18 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 588 Content Per Day: 0.15 Reputation: 82 Days Won: 2 Joined: 11/22/2013 Status: Offline Birthday: 11/12/1969 Share Posted March 21, 2014 Always remember that when dialoging with opposing religions, atheists and evolutionists. They are riddled in THEORIES. They trust their Professors and trust in the opinions of certain groups. But a theory is a theory is a theory ... it's STILL a theory. A commonly accepted theory ... is still a theory. Carbon dating itself is a THEORY due to all the considerations, like atmosphere, etc. Nothing has a date tag attached to it. That's it. That's all I got for you in this. It's a CORE PRINCIPLE that you all can build upon yourselves. The antichrist will cause them to believe the lie.A theory is a good thing to be in science. It means it has been peer-reviewed and the evidence scrutinized and it has predictive value. Gravity is only a theory, but you would't want to jump off a building to test it. If you have a theory you are particularly unhappy with, the science community would be ecstatic to see you disprove it (as theories cannot be proven). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enoch2021 Posted March 21, 2014 Group: Royal Member Followers: 11 Topic Count: 19 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 3,396 Content Per Day: 0.90 Reputation: 730 Days Won: 4 Joined: 12/21/2013 Status: Offline Birthday: 12/26/1963 Share Posted March 21, 2014 Always remember that when dialoging with opposing religions, atheists and evolutionists. They are riddled in THEORIES. They trust their Professors and trust in the opinions of certain groups. But a theory is a theory is a theory ... it's STILL a theory. A commonly accepted theory ... is still a theory. Carbon dating itself is a THEORY due to all the considerations, like atmosphere, etc. Nothing has a date tag attached to it. That's it. That's all I got for you in this. It's a CORE PRINCIPLE that you all can build upon yourselves. The antichrist will cause them to believe the lie. ======================================================== Carbon dating itself is a THEORY Well actually Radiometric Dating isn't even a Theory (More like Guessing ) it's in the trash-bin because it's been Falsified by the many False Positives and errors with Known Ages. The antichrist will cause them to believe the lie. Be careful here, I know what you meant, but..... (2 Thessalonians 2:11) "And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enoch2021 Posted March 21, 2014 Group: Royal Member Followers: 11 Topic Count: 19 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 3,396 Content Per Day: 0.90 Reputation: 730 Days Won: 4 Joined: 12/21/2013 Status: Offline Birthday: 12/26/1963 Share Posted March 21, 2014 A theory is a good thing to be in science. It means it has been peer-reviewed and the evidence scrutinized and it has predictive value. Gravity is only a theory, but you would't want to jump off a building to test it. If you have a theory you are particularly unhappy with, the science community would be ecstatic to see you disprove it (as theories cannot be proven). ===================================================================== It means it has been peer-reviewed and the evidence scrutinized and it has predictive value. Baloney! It's a Baseless Unsupported Fallacious Assertion......again. Peer review is the opposite of science.....it just ossifies the current paradigms or assumptions and censors competing hypothesis that the "good ole boy" network doesn't like. This is anti-science, IMHO...... “There is no such thing as consensus science. If it’s consensus, it isn’t science. If it’s science, it isn’t consensus. Period.” Dr Michael Crichton Speech California Institute of Technology 17 Jan 2003 http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB122603134258207975 Can you say CONFLICT OF INTEREST. No legitimate enterprise polices itself. Would you like me to provide a LONG LIST of examples demonstrating a rather intuitive fact? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jerryR34 Posted March 21, 2014 Group: Removed from Forums for Breaking Terms of Service Followers: 0 Topic Count: 18 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 588 Content Per Day: 0.15 Reputation: 82 Days Won: 2 Joined: 11/22/2013 Status: Offline Birthday: 11/12/1969 Share Posted March 21, 2014 Baloney! It's a Baseless Unsupported Fallacious Assertion......again. Blah, Blah, Blah Baseless Unsupported Fallacious Assertion because Enoch does not understand a concept. Peer review has nothing to do with consensus...it is just the opposite. It is a chance for those in your field to tell you that your theory is wrong. One more concept for which you don't have a clue. Some people see through you Enoch - you are preaching to the choir here - why don't you float your massive knowledge on a board where science prevails and see what the response is? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enoch2021 Posted March 21, 2014 Group: Royal Member Followers: 11 Topic Count: 19 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 3,396 Content Per Day: 0.90 Reputation: 730 Days Won: 4 Joined: 12/21/2013 Status: Offline Birthday: 12/26/1963 Share Posted March 21, 2014 Baloney! It's a Baseless Unsupported Fallacious Assertion......again. Blah, Blah, Blah Baseless Unsupported Fallacious Assertion because Enoch does not understand a concept. Peer review has nothing to do with consensus...it is just the opposite. It is a chance for those in your field to tell you that your theory is wrong. One more concept for which you don't have a clue. Some people see through you Enoch - you are preaching to the choir here - why don't you float your massive knowledge on a board where science prevails and see what the response is? Just let you post unsolicited lol. I must say though this one is in Classic Territory Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enoch2021 Posted March 21, 2014 Group: Royal Member Followers: 11 Topic Count: 19 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 3,396 Content Per Day: 0.90 Reputation: 730 Days Won: 4 Joined: 12/21/2013 Status: Offline Birthday: 12/26/1963 Share Posted March 21, 2014 Always remember that when dialoging with opposing religions, atheists and evolutionists. They are riddled in THEORIES. They trust their Professors and trust in the opinions of certain groups. But a theory is a theory is a theory ... it's STILL a theory. A commonly accepted theory ... is still a theory. Carbon dating itself is a THEORY due to all the considerations, like atmosphere, etc. Nothing has a date tag attached to it. ========================================================================= Another surreptitious little escapade they undertake with "Theory" is a pathetic attempt to equivocate....."Look, Gravity is just a Theory, go jump off a bridge and see what happens lol, do you question that?" Then....you know it's commin, "evolution is a Theory" They need to because it's foundation is built on silly puddy. Funny, you never here anyone defending Einsteinian or Newtonian Physics say "hey, these are as well established as evolution!!" lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jerryR34 Posted March 21, 2014 Group: Removed from Forums for Breaking Terms of Service Followers: 0 Topic Count: 18 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 588 Content Per Day: 0.15 Reputation: 82 Days Won: 2 Joined: 11/22/2013 Status: Offline Birthday: 11/12/1969 Share Posted March 21, 2014 ..."just a theory" haha. next thing you know you will start saying "If man came from dirt, why is there still dirt?" or some silly creationist meme like that... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enoch2021 Posted March 22, 2014 Group: Royal Member Followers: 11 Topic Count: 19 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 3,396 Content Per Day: 0.90 Reputation: 730 Days Won: 4 Joined: 12/21/2013 Status: Offline Birthday: 12/26/1963 Share Posted March 22, 2014 ..."just a theory" haha. next thing you know you will start saying "If man came from dirt, why is there still dirt?" or some silly creationist meme like that... Actually, we "creationists" just intuitively..... stay away from Non-Sequitur's and focus our attention on painfully obvious items such as: The Amazing Kinesin, Yes it's Walking......on, predetermined then constructed roads. It's packages are Date and Time stamped with A Specific Address/Location. It's akin to a Blind Hyper Nano-Tech Fed Ex Delivery Machine. Then we say to ourselves......well, DUH !! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts