Muslim fatwa permits incest in Syria

[OakWood]

Just when you thought the Religion of Peace couldn't stoop any lower!

 

 

 

http://www.raymondibrahim.com/from-the-arab-world/sex-jihad-fatwa-permits-incest-in-syria/

 

Last year, according to Arabic media accounts, “Saudi cleric Nasser al-‘Umar issued a fatwa permitting mujahidin [jihadis] in Syria to have sex-jihad with their sisters [muharamhum] if no one else is available.   The Saudi preacher also praised the mujahidin for their ongoing fight against, in his words, the machine of infidelity and oppression, that is, the Syrian and Iranian regimes.”

The cleric issued his fatwa on “one of the channels associated with the radical jihadi movements” where he also reportedly said: “Some today are opposing the fatwas being issued by the clerics which serve our mujahidin brethren fighting in Syria [a likely reference to Muslim criticism—as opposed to Western denial—of the sex-jihad fatwas, without criticizing the killing of children and women in Syria.”

As shocking as this report may seem, it is not the first of its kind.    For example, according to this Arabic documentary video , “The new jihad allows brothers and sisters in Syria belonging to the [al-Qaeda linked] al-Nusra Front to marry each other under the name of jihad because of the lack of girls among fighters of that organization.”

One man appears on video saying, “At the Zawia mountain there is an imam called Imam Hussein.  They bring him a brother and a sister, he says ‘Allahu Akbar’ on them three times to have sex together and make them husband and wife.”

The rationale and justification of these fatwas is based on the Islamic maxim, “necessity makes the prohibited permissible,” not unlike the more familiar adage, “the ends justify the means.”

In other words, because fighting to make the “word of Allah,” or Sharia, supreme is the greatest good, and because sexually-deprived jihadis fighting to do just that may lose morale and quit the theatre of war for lack of women, it is permissible, indeed laudable, for Muslim women—including apparently relatives—to volunteer to give up their bodies to these men so that they can continue the jihad to empower Islam, in accordance with the Koran:  “Allah has purchased of the believers their persons and their goods; for theirs (in return) is the garden (of Paradise): they fight in His cause, and slay and are slain” (Yusuf Ali trans. 9:111).

Edited May 4, 2014 by OneLight
Removed links in article - please remove links before posting.

[1x1is1]

Very sad to hear.  How do the females stand for this?

[OakWood]

Very sad to hear.  How do the females stand for this?

 

What choice do they have?

[Atwood]

Oakwood observed: "The cleric issued his fatwa"

I don't know who issues the fatwas in England; I don't think the Queen is allowed to do that any longer. But in the USA it is our SCOTUS that issues the fatwas (Supreme Court). Now consider the outrageous fatwas issued here, going back to Rowe v Wade. And the courts have been fat with their fatwas since, even promoting social revolution in morality.

[1x1is1]

Oakwood.......the men have to go to sleep at some point. Don't they?