Jump to content
IGNORED

What is ACTUALLY happeneing?


Galatians_1:10

Do they hide things?  

21 members have voted

  1. 1. Do they hide things?

    • yes
      11
    • no
      2
    • maybe
      1
    • sometimes
      2
    • i have no idea
      1


Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Members
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  5
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  27
  • Content Per Day:  0.00
  • Reputation:   0
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  01/20/2005
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  11/16/1992

I've heard that the news only tells about the bad things that have happened, that they dont mention all of the schools, clinics, hospitals, and other important buildings that have been rebuilt; that they also start and finish with a certian party (the last is the one that you

re most likely to remember, and the second party doesn't get to prove/disprove it). Is it true? And what other things do they not tell us???

Anyhow, i need to go to bed. I will try to get here tomarrow.

Felicia

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Thomas I believe

There are some news organizations that try to tell it all, but theres those editors that got there hands on the buttons in the cutting rooms. Do we ever hear the whole truth ? Most of the time we don't . Theres probally some news we are probally glad we don't hear about........ And some we would love to hear about but don't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  2
  • Topic Count:  115
  • Topics Per Day:  0.02
  • Content Count:  8,281
  • Content Per Day:  1.13
  • Reputation:   249
  • Days Won:  3
  • Joined:  03/03/2004
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  10/30/1955

"DO THEY HIDE THINGS?" Is that a rhetorical question? :whistling:

The real question is: "Do they ever tell the truth?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest charlie

I think a lot of news is squashed or orchestrated. Plus a lot of newstime is taken up by celebrity stories like the Michael Jackson or Prince Charles type stories. I just read a story today about a White House reporter whose been using a fake name and well......here you go ( you can bet this one won't get the "press-time" that Dan Rather got):

Loose 'Gannon': White House Reporter Is Really James D. Guckert

By Joe Strupp and Greg Mitchell

Published: February 10, 2005 updated 11:30 PM ET

NEW YORK Jeff Gannon, the controversial White House correspondent for the obscure, conservative Web site Talon News who resigned from his job Tuesday, confirmed late Wednesday, in a phone interview with National Public Radio, that he has been using a false name. A few hours later, Howard Kurtz, writing in The Washington Post, confirmed earlier tips, arising from liberal blogs, that the reporter's real name is indeed James D. Guckert.

Despite the ruse, "Gannon" still managed to gain access to many White House briefings and was one of the few reporters allowed to ask President Bush a (very friendly) question at a press conference two weeks ago.

NPR reported Wednesday that when Gannon was turned down for Capitol Hill credentials -- a move first reported by E&P last week -- he had used the name James Guckert. He admitted to NPR that Gannon was not his real name, and left it at that.

This "begs further investigation," James Pinkerton, a media critic for Fox News, told the online magazine Salon.com. He recalled that in the six years he worked for Presidents Reagan and George H.W. Bush, the White House was "strict about who got in. It's inconceivable to me that the White House, especially after 9/11, gives credentials to people without doing a background check. ... If [Gannon] was walking around the White House with a pass that had a different name on it than his real name, that's pretty remarkable."

Dana Milbank, the former White House correspondent for The Washington Post, said the "scandal" of the whole episode was that it was blogs, and not the White House, that ultimately exposed Gannon's ruse. Milbank, on Keith Olbermann's MSNBC program, said he'd seen Gannon at the White House as recently as Monday.

Gannon, amazingly, also has ties to the Valerie Plame/CIA scandal.

Adding another twist, NPR's David Folkenflik, in his report Wednesday night, referred to revelations arising from liberal blogs earlier in the day, connecting Gannon to sexual Web sites such as HotMilitaryStud.com, among others.

"These sites are registered to an address in Delaware that's the same as one held by a James Guckert," Folkenflik said. "And that's the name that Gannon used to apply for press credentials on Capitol Hill. ... As for those Web sites, Gannon said he created them for clients of a software company he used to work for. And Gannon said his Christian faith has enabled him to receive forgiveness for the sins of his past."

The New York Daily News' story on Thursday carried the headline, "Bush press pal quits over gay prostie link." Washington reporter Helen Kennedy wrote: "A conservative ringer who was given a press pass to the White House and lobbed softball questions at President Bush quit yesterday after left-leaning Internet bloggers discovered possible ties to gay prostitution."

On Tuesday, in a message on his Web site (www.jeffgannon.com), Gannon announced: "Because of the attention being paid to me I find it is no longer possible to effectively be a reporter for Talon News. In consideration of the welfare of me and my family I have decided to return to private life. Thank you to all those who supported me."

E&P has not been able to reach "Gannon" since. But he told the daily paper in his hometown in Delaware, The News Journal of Wilmington: "I asked a question at a White House press briefing and this is what happened to me. If this is what happens to me, what reporter is safe?"

Gannon's real name, Guckert, had been outed earlier Wedneday by investigators at DailyKos, Eschaton, Media Matters and other sites. They also showed that Talon News is run by a Texas GOP activist.

Also Wednesday, Rep. Louise Slaughter (D-N.Y.) sent a letter to President Bush asking him to "address the matter" in light of "mounting evidence that your Administration has, on several occasions, paid members of the media to advocate in favor of Administration policies."

Gannon first gained attention several weeks ago when he asked a question at a presidential press conference that some in the press corps considered so friendly it might have been planted. Later E&P revealed that Gannon had been turned down last year for a congressional press pass because he could not prove his employer was a valid news organization. That denial barred him from receiving a White House "hard pass," allowing regular access to White House press events.

But Gannon had been obtaining daily White House press passes, a situation that had irked some veteran White House reporters who also questioned his credentials or considered him to be too partisan in his questioning.

On Olbermann's program Wednesday night, however, Milbank said he had seen Gannon with a pass and photo I.D. that certainly looked like it was of the permanent variety.

On Thursday, The Boston Globe reported that Gannon told them he had gotten no special consideration at the White House. He had applied for a background check and daily passes under the name on his driver's license, not his "professional name," he said.

Earlier in the day, on CNN, the Washington Post's Howard Kurtz said that White House spokesman Scott McClellan had told him that "President Bush didn't know who Jeff Gannon was when he called on him at that news conference."

Gannon's original refusal to deny he used a fake name sparked investigations by a number of blogs, which probed his true identity. In addition, those sites posted allegations that Web sites such as hotmilitarystud.com, militaryescorts.com, and militaryescortsm4m.com, were registered to the same owner as Gannon's personal Web site.

"The bloggers," Kurtz writes today, "also have linked to a since-withdrawn America Online photo of a man who appears to be Gannon, posing in his underwear, with a screen name bearing the initials 'JDG.'"

In her letter to President Bush, Rep. Slaughter charged that "it appears that 'Mr. Gannon's' presence in the White House press corps was merely as a tool of propaganda for your Administration."

Dan Froomkin, the Washington Post columnist, said Wednesday in an online chat, "the heat should be on" Scott McClellan: "Why did he call on Gannon? Did they ever pre-arrange anything? Did they have contact with his parent organization?"

Another intriguing issue is his involvement, along with the better-known Robert Novak, Judith Miller, and others, in the Valerie Plame/CIA episode. Gannon's name turned up on a list of reporters targeted for questioning by the federal prosecutor in the case. Froomkin of the the Washington Post wrote last spring that "the reason Gannon is on the list is most likely an attempt to find out who gave him a secret memo that he mentioned in an interview he had with Plame's husband, former ambassador and administration critic Joseph Wilson."

The Talon News site today scrubbed its archives of many "Gannon" articles and removed his biography. It said it was already looking for a replacement for its star reporter.

In an e-mail to E&P last Friday, not published until now, Gannon wrote: "Much has been made about whether I use a professional name or not, but I am reluctant to provide information one way or another because of the threats that have been made against my person, property and family in both internet postings ... as well as in e-mails that I have forwarded to law enforcement. I'm sure you understand."

Olbermann on his TV show Wednesday referred to Gannon as "HBO's Ali G, without the satire."

Joe Strupp and Greg Mitchell (letters@editorandpublisher.com) are editors at E&P.

Edited by charlie
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Advanced Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  25
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  155
  • Content Per Day:  0.02
  • Reputation:   1
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  02/16/2002
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  02/13/1953

I've heard that the news only tells about the bad things that have happened, that they dont mention all of the schools, clinics, hospitals, and other important buildings that have been rebuilt; that they also start and finish with a certian party (the last is the one that you

re most likely to remember, and the second party doesn't get to prove/disprove it). Is it true? And what other things do they not tell us???

Anyhow, i need to go to bed. I will try to get here tomarrow.

Felicia

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

If one nation launches a brutal war of aggression against another based on lies, massacres over one hundred thousand civilians(red cross estimate) tortures tens of thousands, now, whether these brutal forces build a school or two for the six o

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Members
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  5
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  27
  • Content Per Day:  0.00
  • Reputation:   0
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  01/20/2005
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  11/16/1992

yes, it does matter. based on Recommendation 666, both the chapter and the document that was passed between members of power, the anti-christ maybe at hand. i, personally, am facinated by the end times, nobody will know when it will happen, when Jesus will come, wheather there is a pre-trib-rapture or not, and many more. We also cannot predict who the anti-christ is. But we can pick up clues fortold in the Bible. The things that have happened. What if there is vital information that the news doesn't display? I didn't ever hear about the Recommendation document on the news, if i hadn't seen that post, i would've never know. so YES it does matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Worthy Ministers
  • Followers:  23
  • Topic Count:  155
  • Topics Per Day:  0.02
  • Content Count:  7,464
  • Content Per Day:  1.02
  • Reputation:   8,810
  • Days Won:  57
  • Joined:  03/30/2004
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  12/12/1952

I too think they focus only on the bad things. However we can't know everything that is going on for the sake of secruity. If the public knows it then the enemy will know it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Members
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  5
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  27
  • Content Per Day:  0.00
  • Reputation:   0
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  01/20/2005
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  11/16/1992

they have siad things like where they were going to search for Binladen next on the news before. (back when). so i dont thhink that that is an issue, the whole enemy will know thing.

Edited by Galatians_1:10
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  2
  • Topic Count:  123
  • Topics Per Day:  0.02
  • Content Count:  3,111
  • Content Per Day:  0.39
  • Reputation:   35
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  08/29/2002
  • Status:  Offline

If one nation ...... massacres over one hundred thousand civilians

IMO, this is a blatant lie against America.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Worthy Ministers
  • Followers:  29
  • Topic Count:  596
  • Topics Per Day:  0.08
  • Content Count:  56,043
  • Content Per Day:  7.56
  • Reputation:   27,788
  • Days Won:  271
  • Joined:  12/29/2003
  • Status:  Offline

Well the Red Cross does believe that about 100,000 civilians have died, I don't think I would use the word massacre with it.

Looking at the situation from the military persons point of view, they are just trying to live long enough to come home to their wives/husbands/parents/lovers. Putting it in these words make our military look like some kind of Genghis Kahn kind of army and with the exception of a very very few, just isn't so.

If what I read about Depleted Uranium is true, "you aint' seen nothin' yet." Wait about 2 and a half years and see how many die of cancer and other related respatory problems that stuff will create. Both in Iraq and here at home from the people we sent there......

Just one more disaster to ponder for the future, and there needs be no argument we can just wait and see....... time tells all....... well unless time ends, and in that case who cares. :emot-questioned:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...