Jump to content
IGNORED

Living Fossil's


DARRELX

Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Advanced Member
  • Followers:  8
  • Topic Count:  10
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  132
  • Content Per Day:  0.05
  • Reputation:   93
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  06/26/2016
  • Status:  Offline

Living fossils are species that have been fossilized but still exist today.

Now the Lobster is well known

If evolution were true then no species supposedly living hundreds of millions of years ago would have stopped evolving. 

Living fossils are visible proof that evolution is not true. 

IMG_20160712_113230_991.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Nonbeliever
  • Followers:  6
  • Topic Count:  2
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  738
  • Content Per Day:  0.21
  • Reputation:   346
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  05/28/2014
  • Status:  Offline

Except that evolution does not insist that an organism MUST evolve morphologically.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Worthy Ministers
  • Followers:  96
  • Topic Count:  304
  • Topics Per Day:  0.08
  • Content Count:  18,094
  • Content Per Day:  4.65
  • Reputation:   27,773
  • Days Won:  327
  • Joined:  08/03/2013
  • Status:  Offline

Blessings DARRELLX.....

    Interesting that you chose"fossils" to refute evolution since fossils are generally remains preserved for an(alleged)minimum of roughly 10,000 years of age,,,,,so would you consider yourself a young or old earth creationist ?    Just wondering,,,,^_^                              With love-in Christ,Kwik

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Advanced Member
  • Followers:  8
  • Topic Count:  10
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  132
  • Content Per Day:  0.05
  • Reputation:   93
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  06/26/2016
  • Status:  Offline

8 hours ago, kwikphilly said:

Would you consider yourself a young or old earth creationist ?    Just wondering,,,,^_^                              With love-in Christ,Kwik

Yes of course

11 hours ago, Bonky said:

Except that evolution does not insist that an organism MUST evolve morphologically.   

Of course it does unless you still think along the line's of Darwinism rather then Neo Darwinism. 

If random beneficial mutations occur as Neo Darwinist claim, then it would be impossible for any species living supposedly hundreds of millions of years ago, to not change. 

If evolution were true no species could be exempt. 

Since evolution never happened living fossils make perfect sense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Advanced Member
  • Followers:  8
  • Topic Count:  10
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  132
  • Content Per Day:  0.05
  • Reputation:   93
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  06/26/2016
  • Status:  Offline

9 hours ago, kwikphilly said:

 Interesting that you chose"fossils" to refute evolution since fossils are generally remains preserved for an(alleged)minimum of roughly 10,000 years of age.

All living fossils are dated by secular reasoning as being hundreds of millions of years old. 

Obviously they can only be as old as the ancient flood..

What living fossils also prove is that all fossils still would be alive today if they had not gone extinct as species do even up to our time. 

Extinction of some species do not prove that they are evolutionary ancestors of species today. 

Plus the fossil records are completely static and any references to transitional fossils is pure rhetoric and wishful thinking. 

There is no evidence of gradually evolving species in the fossil records and if there were there would be no living fossils. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Advanced Member
  • Followers:  8
  • Topic Count:  10
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  132
  • Content Per Day:  0.05
  • Reputation:   93
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  06/26/2016
  • Status:  Offline

Oh I see Bonky you are a nonbeliever :ph34r:

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Worthy Ministers
  • Followers:  68
  • Topic Count:  185
  • Topics Per Day:  0.04
  • Content Count:  14,204
  • Content Per Day:  3.35
  • Reputation:   16,629
  • Days Won:  30
  • Joined:  08/14/2012
  • Status:  Offline

so are you talking about me????

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Advanced Member
  • Followers:  8
  • Topic Count:  10
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  132
  • Content Per Day:  0.05
  • Reputation:   93
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  06/26/2016
  • Status:  Offline

55 minutes ago, Willa said:

so are you talking about me????

Yes if you are a living fossil :laugh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Diamond Member
  • Followers:  6
  • Topic Count:  44
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  1,370
  • Content Per Day:  0.25
  • Reputation:   1,054
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  06/21/2009
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  07/18/1868

My daughter calls me a living fossil--- I have not evolved at all

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Worthy Ministers
  • Followers:  96
  • Topic Count:  304
  • Topics Per Day:  0.08
  • Content Count:  18,094
  • Content Per Day:  4.65
  • Reputation:   27,773
  • Days Won:  327
  • Joined:  08/03/2013
  • Status:  Offline

Hi DARRELX...

Quote
2ac29_surprised-cat1.jpeg.725ff2a1738ef0  
Posted in Living Fossil's
8 hours ago, kwikphilly said:

Would you consider yourself a young or old earth creationist ?    Just wondering,,,,^_^                              With love-in Christ,Kwik

Yes of course

?  lol,  Which one?  perhaps undecided? If I may ask............                                                                             With love-in Christ,Kwik

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...