Jump to content
IGNORED

Psalm 82 "trasnlation"


ProzacR

Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Members
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  17
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  49
  • Content Per Day:  0.01
  • Reputation:   4
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  04/26/2014
  • Status:  Offline

Today I found one really shocking issue. Was checking psalms, you know how they sound in Latin, maybe learn something, and found very strange issues with Psalm 82.

Here just look:
http://www.biblestudytools.com/parallel-bible/passage/?q=psalm+82&t=vul&t2=niv

19 lines vs. 8!? You do not need to know Latin to realize that something is terribly wrong with those "translations".

All comments are really appreciated, but I really would like to hear from person who can read Latin and English versions. Please state so if you can.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  16
  • Topic Count:  104
  • Topics Per Day:  0.04
  • Content Count:  3,776
  • Content Per Day:  1.29
  • Reputation:   4,746
  • Days Won:  2
  • Joined:  03/31/2016
  • Status:  Offline

7 hours ago, ProzacR said:

Today I found one really shocking issue. Was checking psalms, you know how they sound in Latin, maybe learn something, and found very strange issues with Psalm 82.

Here just look:
http://www.biblestudytools.com/parallel-bible/passage/?q=psalm+82&t=vul&t2=niv

19 lines vs. 8!? You do not need to know Latin to realize that something is terribly wrong with those "translations".

All comments are really appreciated, but I really would like to hear from person who can read Latin and English versions. Please state so if you can.

You've got a problem alright.  :huh:

The Latin Vulgate your link is showing is Psalm 83, not Psalm 82.  The NIV is showing Psalm 82. 

Hence ... 19 verses and 8 verses.

Edited by Jayne
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...