Steward George Posted March 13, 2002 Group: Steward Followers: 110 Topic Count: 10,465 Topics Per Day: 1.26 Content Count: 27,764 Content Per Day: 3.33 Reputation: 15,435 Days Won: 128 Joined: 06/30/2001 Status: Online Birthday: 09/21/1971 Steward Share Posted March 13, 2002 What are your thoughts on the U.S. drafted United Nations Resolution referring to a Palestinian State existing side by side with Israel?With much agape love,George Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nebuchadnezzar Posted March 13, 2002 Group: Advanced Member Followers: 1 Topic Count: 25 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 155 Content Per Day: 0.02 Reputation: 1 Days Won: 0 Joined: 02/16/2002 Status: Offline Birthday: 02/13/1953 Share Posted March 13, 2002 The US needs to have some kind of dialog going between Israel and the Palestinians because it needs to use Arab land for launching attacks against Iraq. This startling about face for the Americans will be short lived and last only until the war with Iraq is over.I don Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest revfnb Posted March 13, 2002 Share Posted March 13, 2002 Would you give half or one third or even one tenth of the United States for an Arab state? There is a Palestinian state. The name of that state is Jordon. Jordon kicked out the Egytian terrorist Arafat when he tried to take over Jordon. The idea of a Palestinian State is a horrible idea just like Oslo II was a horrible idea. Arafat broke everthing agreed on in the Oslo II. He has proved to be a terrorist, a liar, a killer, a protector of other terrorist. If the UN makes a Palestinian State it will certainly bring God's judgement against the US and the UN according to Joel 3:1-2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freedom Posted March 14, 2002 Group: Members Followers: 0 Topic Count: 4 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 40 Content Per Day: 0.00 Reputation: 0 Days Won: 0 Joined: 03/10/2002 Status: Offline Share Posted March 14, 2002 1Thes.5 [3] For when they shall say, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with child; and they shall not escape. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Levi Posted March 14, 2002 Share Posted March 14, 2002 The Jews have also broken numerous agreements and not only that they provoke the Palestinians into fighting so they can justify themselves. The Palestinians belong on this land, Jordan is not theirs. They resided in Palestine for many generations before the Israelis came back, that's why they are now called Palestinians because the land was called Palestine before the Jews arrived. To put it bluntly revfnb, the argument that they should be absorbed by other Arab states is redundant. It solves nothing. Sharon is just a loose canon and needs to be removed in order for there to be any serious peace talks. I agree, this is aimed at Iraq and is only to serve American self interest in toppling Saddam. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest revfnb Posted March 14, 2002 Share Posted March 14, 2002 Levi, I agreed with U.S. Sen. James M. Inhofe's Senate Floor statement of March 4, 2002, where he gave seven reasons that Israel is entitled to the land. For purpose of this post I will not give his arguments for each statement, but just the reasons. They were: 1.) All the archeological evidence supports a 3,000 presence. 2.) Israel's right to the land is the historic right. 3.) Israel today is a modern marvel of agriculture - thus a blessing to the region and not a curse. 4.) Israel has the right to the land on the grounds of humanitarian concern. 5.) Israel is a strategic ally of the United States 6.) Israel is a roadblock to terrorism. 7.) God says Israel has the to the land. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steward George Posted March 14, 2002 Group: Steward Followers: 110 Topic Count: 10,465 Topics Per Day: 1.26 Content Count: 27,764 Content Per Day: 3.33 Reputation: 15,435 Days Won: 128 Joined: 06/30/2001 Status: Online Birthday: 09/21/1971 Steward Share Posted March 14, 2002 AN OSLO SCORECARDThe Oslo Accords signed between Israel and the Palestinian Liberation Organisation in 1993 and 1995 committed both parties to a range of obligations. Since then, claims of "Oslo violations" have come thick and fast. ISRAEL HAS: Recognised the PLO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest revfnb Posted March 14, 2002 Share Posted March 14, 2002 Levi said, "They resided in Palestine for many generations before the Israelis came back, that's why they are now called Palestinians because the land was called Palestine before the Jews arrived. To put it bluntly revfnb, the argument that they should be absorbed by other Arab states is redundant. It solves nothing." I must take issue. The offical designation of the name Palestine dates back to 135 C.E. when the Romans renamed it after the great Jewish revolt of that year. Palestine has never been an independent country. There was massive Arab immigration unto Palestine before 1948 and when the Jew were kick out of the new Arab countries in that area the Arab neighbors did not allow the Arab Palestine refugees to take the place of the now empty Jews homes and businesses instead they refused to solve the refugee problem so it would become an weapon against Israel and the UN. In simple terms the Arabs don't care if the Palestine Arab lives or dies as long as their isn't a Jew alieve in the Middle East. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freedom Posted March 14, 2002 Group: Members Followers: 0 Topic Count: 4 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 40 Content Per Day: 0.00 Reputation: 0 Days Won: 0 Joined: 03/10/2002 Status: Offline Share Posted March 14, 2002 revfnb,I agree, and it's going to backfire. most are syrians. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freedom Posted March 14, 2002 Group: Members Followers: 0 Topic Count: 4 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 40 Content Per Day: 0.00 Reputation: 0 Days Won: 0 Joined: 03/10/2002 Status: Offline Share Posted March 14, 2002 I remember Damascus being wiped out as well, but don't remember the scripture right off had.could this be it?Isa.17 [1] The burden of Damascus. Behold, Damascus is taken away from being a city, and it shall be a ruinous heap. [3] The fortress also shall cease from Ephraim, and the kingdom from Damascus, and the remnant of Syria: they shall be as the glory of the children of Israel, saith the LORD of hosts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts