Guest shiloh357 Posted December 30, 2016 Share Posted December 30, 2016 38 minutes ago, heyvavhey said: Everything he is lying about. Which is everything he's said in 8 years. C'mon man!? Suspend your intelligence so a proven liar can be considered for sainthood! LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SimonB Posted January 10, 2017 Group: Diamond Member Followers: 1 Topic Count: 8 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 2,437 Content Per Day: 0.90 Reputation: 730 Days Won: 0 Joined: 11/30/2016 Status: Offline Share Posted January 10, 2017 On 29/12/2016 at 7:48 PM, Ezra said: What should have happened already is that charges should have been brought against Barack Hussein Obama on many counts, including high treason. Realistically this could never happen until post 20th Jan. Everyone is afraid to make too big a bang. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SimonB Posted January 10, 2017 Group: Diamond Member Followers: 1 Topic Count: 8 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 2,437 Content Per Day: 0.90 Reputation: 730 Days Won: 0 Joined: 11/30/2016 Status: Offline Share Posted January 10, 2017 On 29/12/2016 at 8:03 PM, missmuffet said: The Russian hacking thing still stays in my mind as a big question mark. Even if it turns out there was Russian hacking it would be of the DNC not the election itself as some media outlets are trying to imply. Also a molehill has been turned into a mountain because the Democrats handled classified email on inadequately secured networks. That has been evidenced. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SimonB Posted January 10, 2017 Group: Diamond Member Followers: 1 Topic Count: 8 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 2,437 Content Per Day: 0.90 Reputation: 730 Days Won: 0 Joined: 11/30/2016 Status: Offline Share Posted January 10, 2017 On 29/12/2016 at 8:51 PM, shiloh357 said: Yeah, it kind of does. No evidence, no smoking gun. Nothing but baseless accusations. The Russians could not do anything to affect the outcome of our elections, nothing. The Russians are a scapegoat to avoid any discussion of the contents of the Emails that expose the corruption of the DNC and the liberal media. I am so sick of this guilty till proven innocent thing. You think we should punish the Russians over something we have no evidence they did? To be correct, the lack of evidence does not prove something didn't happen but it does mean there isn't a case as the burden of proof is on the accuser. I do agree with your other comments. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ezra Posted January 11, 2017 Group: Royal Member Followers: 16 Topic Count: 134 Topics Per Day: 0.04 Content Count: 8,142 Content Per Day: 2.36 Reputation: 6,612 Days Won: 20 Joined: 11/02/2014 Status: Offline Share Posted January 11, 2017 2 hours ago, SimonB said: To be correct, the lack of evidence does not prove something didn't happen... Something did happen, but it was Wikileaks which made it happen. And what happened was that the mask was removed from Hillary, Podesta, Obama, and the DNC, along with Huma and Weiner. Actually the FBI already had plenty of ammunition back in 2015 to bring charges against Hillary, but they chose to violate their legal obligation to do so. Back to the anti-Israel shenanigans of the Obama administration. That too was finally unmasked. and evidence was presented to show who was actually behind that UN resolution. Had the MSM been doing their jobs, this would have been a huge story. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SimonB Posted January 11, 2017 Group: Diamond Member Followers: 1 Topic Count: 8 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 2,437 Content Per Day: 0.90 Reputation: 730 Days Won: 0 Joined: 11/30/2016 Status: Offline Share Posted January 11, 2017 (edited) Which begs the question, when we do have actual evidence why aren't things being looked into? As to the MSM you make the mistake of assuming their "job" is to report the real news, I think they assert their "job" is entertainment. In which case we should view their "news" in that light. Hopefully some will still seek to expose the truth. Edited January 11, 2017 by SimonB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heyvavhey Posted January 14, 2017 Group: Advanced Member Followers: 1 Topic Count: 4 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 346 Content Per Day: 0.13 Reputation: 140 Days Won: 0 Joined: 12/09/2016 Status: Offline Share Posted January 14, 2017 (edited) On 1/11/2017 at 8:35 AM, SimonB said: Which begs the question, when we do have actual evidence why aren't things being looked into? How much more evidence do we need to make that decision? Seems obvious that it's because the wolves are running the hen house. Edited January 14, 2017 by heyvavhey Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SimonB Posted January 15, 2017 Group: Diamond Member Followers: 1 Topic Count: 8 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 2,437 Content Per Day: 0.90 Reputation: 730 Days Won: 0 Joined: 11/30/2016 Status: Offline Share Posted January 15, 2017 I personally would have preferred "the lunatics are in charge of the asylum" Seems more like the current situation Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts