What’s Happening to Kim Burrell Is a Reminder For Christian Boldness

[soonsister]

In 1982 in the case, New York v. Ferber, 458 U.S. 747, the ACLU defended NMBLA, (National Man Boy Love Association) and their right to disperse child porn?

The ACLU’s position is this: criminalize the production but legalize the sale and distribution of child pornography. This is the kind of lawyerly distinction that no one on the Supreme Court found convincing. And with good reason: as long as a free market in child pornography exists, there will always be some producers willing to risk prosecution. Beyond this, there is also the matter of how the sale of child pornography relates either to free speech or the ends of good government. But most important, the central issue is whether a free society should legalize transactions that involve the wholesale sexploitation of children for profit.

The ACLU objects to the idea that porn movie producers be required to maintain records of ages of its performers; this would be ” a gross violation of privacy.” Quotes from Twilight Of Liberty

 

Every decision by a court sets a precedent. Or furthers case law .  When SCOTUS decided homosexuals were protected under the 14th amendment to marry, they set in motion their right also to adopt children.

Being SCOTUS determined that marriage is a civil right for homosexuals, now they've extended the civil right that occurred in Loving V. Virginia, which allowed interracial marriage, to those who are not traditional (God covenant) marriage couples. Gays.

This gives those who practice pedophilia(attraction to infants and minors), ephebophilia (attraction to adolescents), and even polygamy, the opportunity to argue their right under the 14th.

In the case of the ephebophile community their road is easier. The parent of a adolescent can in many cases/states sign a consent form that permits their minor child to marry their abuser. This happened in the case of the actor Doug Hutchison. He met his bride when she was 12 years of age. With her parents signature of consent, he married her when she was 16. I expect that eventually a movement will arise that seeks to emancipate sexually active minors from needing parental permission  to marry their abuser. The excuse will be the child has the right to choose to marry when they exercised the choice to engage in sex with their offender.

We're on a slippery slope in America now. Immoral behaviors are coming out of the closet with rights that allow them to target Christians whom they intend to put into the closet. Taking away their rights to be offended, object, refuse to concede to demands to tolerate immorality or even speak the language that acknowledges the immoral.

Example, being made to take sensitivity training courses so as to unlearn your personal opinion and/or religious conviction. And instead accept that a man with implants, wearing makeup, and wearing a dress has a right to be addressed as she.