Jump to content
IGNORED

Trump Campaign Aides Had Repeated Contacts With Russian Intelligence


Tea Ess

Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Advanced Member
  • Followers:  2
  • Topic Count:  7
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  312
  • Content Per Day:  0.12
  • Reputation:   140
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  12/10/2016
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  09/05/1998

Just now, Jewels7 said:

Doesn't change the fact that Hillary has media on payroll as reported by the parody site. Maybe address that fact.

Okay. It's wrong. Hillary did not have reporters on her payroll. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  16
  • Topic Count:  134
  • Topics Per Day:  0.04
  • Content Count:  8,142
  • Content Per Day:  2.37
  • Reputation:   6,612
  • Days Won:  20
  • Joined:  11/02/2014
  • Status:  Offline

1 minute ago, Tea Ess said:

It's from a parody website, though. It would be like linking The Onion. And as far as I can tell, the leaked emails didn't show that Hillary had reporters on her payroll. 

Why are you trying to protect Hillary and dismiss Wikileaks?  Do you really want to see those Wikileaks documents? There is no parody here.  Those documents absolutely showed the reporters who were on Hillary's payroll, and trying to claim that they were forged or fudged won't cut it.  

And the whole world knows how the media were rigging the debates in Hillary's favor, feeding her with unauthorized information, etc. Wasserman-Schulz and Donna Brazile were exposed, and had to step down from their respective positions. So kindly do some serious research about this matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Senior Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  19
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  713
  • Content Per Day:  0.27
  • Reputation:   351
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  02/10/2017
  • Status:  Offline

8 minutes ago, Tea Ess said:

Okay. It's wrong. Hillary did not have reporters on her payroll. 

Saying that isn't proof. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Advanced Member
  • Followers:  2
  • Topic Count:  7
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  312
  • Content Per Day:  0.12
  • Reputation:   140
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  12/10/2016
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  09/05/1998

1 minute ago, Ezra said:

Why are you trying to protect Hillary and dismiss Wikileaks?  Do you really want to see those Wikileaks documents? There is no parody here.  Those documents absolutely showed the reporters who were on Hillary's payroll, and trying to claim that they were forged or fudged won't cut it.  

And the whole world knows how the media were rigging the debates in Hillary's favor, feeding her with unauthorized information, etc. Wasserman-Schulz and Donna Brazile were exposed, and had to step down from their respective positions. So kindly do some serious research about this matter.

Can you link a reliable and non-parody source that shows that Hillary Clinton had reporters on payroll? The Washington Post reported on the leaked emails that showed she had friendly reporters that her campaign gave stories to, but not that they were on payroll. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Advanced Member
  • Followers:  2
  • Topic Count:  7
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  312
  • Content Per Day:  0.12
  • Reputation:   140
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  12/10/2016
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  09/05/1998

Just now, Jewels7 said:

Saying that isn't proof. 

You can't prove a negative (eg Hillary did not have reporters on payroll). The burden of proof is on the one making the claim. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Senior Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  19
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  713
  • Content Per Day:  0.27
  • Reputation:   351
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  02/10/2017
  • Status:  Offline

3 minutes ago, Tea Ess said:

You can't prove a negative (eg Hillary did not have reporters on payroll). The burden of proof is on the one making the claim. 

Of course you can prove a negative. 

Evidence of Hillary having off the record contacts with 30 reporters before her campaign is out there. And Super PAC's are not to be discounted as doing a candidates bidding either. 

http://www.campaignlegalcenter.org/sites/default/files/10-06-16 Correct the Record%2BClinton final.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Senior Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  19
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  713
  • Content Per Day:  0.27
  • Reputation:   351
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  02/10/2017
  • Status:  Offline

3 minutes ago, Davida said:

The Onion has truer News then CNN!!

:laugh: And is vastly more entertaining too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Advanced Member
  • Followers:  2
  • Topic Count:  7
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  312
  • Content Per Day:  0.12
  • Reputation:   140
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  12/10/2016
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  09/05/1998

1 minute ago, Jewels7 said:

Of course you can prove a negative. 

Evidence of Hillary having off the record contacts with 30 reporters before her campaign is out there. And Super PAC's are not to be discounted as doing a candidates bidding either. 

http://www.campaignlegalcenter.org/sites/default/files/10-06-16 Correct the Record%2BClinton final.pdf

If I said that pink rabbits lived on Pluto, the burden of proof would be on me to prove it, not you to disprove it. 

I already conceded that Hillary and her campaign had friendly reporters, so I'm not surprised she had off the records contacts with them, but there's still no evidence that she had them on payroll. That's what I'm disputing here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Advanced Member
  • Followers:  2
  • Topic Count:  7
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  312
  • Content Per Day:  0.12
  • Reputation:   140
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  12/10/2016
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  09/05/1998

Just now, Davida said:

There's unsubstantiated pink rabbits on Pluto?!?!?!!!!

:emot-highfive: Alright!!:36:

Possibly, but I haven't provided proof for that claim, so I don't expect anyone to believe it. 

It's the same thing with Hillary having reporters on payroll. I am not aware of any evidence supporting that claim, so no one should be expected to believe it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Senior Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  19
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  713
  • Content Per Day:  0.27
  • Reputation:   351
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  02/10/2017
  • Status:  Offline

15 minutes ago, Davida said:

:D and it lowers my BP rather then raising it!!

Always a big plus. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...