missmuffet Posted February 17, 2017 Group: Royal Member Followers: 34 Topic Count: 1,991 Topics Per Day: 0.48 Content Count: 48,689 Content Per Day: 11.81 Reputation: 30,343 Days Won: 226 Joined: 01/11/2013 Status: Offline Author Share Posted February 17, 2017 32 minutes ago, MorningGlory said: It depends on we, the people. If they couldn't impeach Clinton, at least not all the way, they can''t Trump either. I think that is what they are trying to get in place. They are trying to make it possible in case of a serious infraction. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MorningGlory Posted February 17, 2017 Group: Royal Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 1,022 Topics Per Day: 0.16 Content Count: 39,193 Content Per Day: 6.11 Reputation: 9,977 Days Won: 78 Joined: 10/01/2006 Status: Offline Share Posted February 17, 2017 24 minutes ago, missmuffet said: I think that is what they are trying to get in place. They are trying to make it possible in case of a serious infraction. You mean like paying a 100 billion dollar ransom to the Iranians? You know, in cash so it couldn't be traced? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
missmuffet Posted February 17, 2017 Group: Royal Member Followers: 34 Topic Count: 1,991 Topics Per Day: 0.48 Content Count: 48,689 Content Per Day: 11.81 Reputation: 30,343 Days Won: 226 Joined: 01/11/2013 Status: Offline Author Share Posted February 17, 2017 31 minutes ago, MorningGlory said: You mean like paying a 100 billion dollar ransom to the Iranians? You know, in cash so it couldn't be traced? Huh? what does this have to do with the 25th Amendment? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve_S Posted February 17, 2017 Group: Servant Followers: 25 Topic Count: 275 Topics Per Day: 0.05 Content Count: 5,208 Content Per Day: 1.00 Reputation: 1,893 Days Won: 0 Joined: 01/02/2010 Status: Offline Share Posted February 17, 2017 3 hours ago, missmuffet said: I think that is what they are trying to get in place. They are trying to make it possible in case of a serious infraction. It is already possible in the case of a serious infraction. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MorningGlory Posted February 17, 2017 Group: Royal Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 1,022 Topics Per Day: 0.16 Content Count: 39,193 Content Per Day: 6.11 Reputation: 9,977 Days Won: 78 Joined: 10/01/2006 Status: Offline Share Posted February 17, 2017 19 hours ago, missmuffet said: Huh? what does this have to do with the 25th Amendment? You said 'in case of a serious infraction'; I was giving an example of one. Didn't get the instigator impeached, did it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest shiloh357 Posted February 17, 2017 Share Posted February 17, 2017 20 hours ago, missmuffet said: Huh? what does this have to do with the 25th Amendment? Her point is that what Obama did was an impeachable offense, and Trump who has committed no impeachable offenses, won't get impeached either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
missmuffet Posted February 17, 2017 Group: Royal Member Followers: 34 Topic Count: 1,991 Topics Per Day: 0.48 Content Count: 48,689 Content Per Day: 11.81 Reputation: 30,343 Days Won: 226 Joined: 01/11/2013 Status: Offline Author Share Posted February 17, 2017 58 minutes ago, shiloh357 said: Her point is that what Obama did was an impeachable offense, and Trump who has committed no impeachable offenses, won't get impeached either. Oh we are back on Obama now? Obama is no longer our President and Hilary did not make the election. We need to stop using them as scapegoats and focus on what Trump is doing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest shiloh357 Posted February 17, 2017 Share Posted February 17, 2017 4 minutes ago, missmuffet said: Oh we are back on Obama now? Obama is no longer our President and Hilary did not make the election. We need to stop using them as scapegoats and focus on what Trump is doing. We're not using them as scapegoats. We are simply pointing out the hypocrisy of those who entertain impeachment for Trump when he has done nothing to warrant it, yet ignored the truly impeachable offensives committed by Obama And by the way, look up the proper use of the word, "scapegoat." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
missmuffet Posted February 17, 2017 Group: Royal Member Followers: 34 Topic Count: 1,991 Topics Per Day: 0.48 Content Count: 48,689 Content Per Day: 11.81 Reputation: 30,343 Days Won: 226 Joined: 01/11/2013 Status: Offline Author Share Posted February 17, 2017 2 minutes ago, shiloh357 said: We're not using them as scapegoats. We are simply pointing out the hypocrisy of those who entertain impeachment for Trump when he has done nothing to warrant it, yet ignored the truly impeachable offensives committed by Obama And by the way, look up the proper use of the word, "scapegoat." We need to focus on Trump and Trump alone. No one else is in the WH now and governing the U.S. Scapegoat: a person who is blamed for the wrongdoings, mistakes, or faults of others, especially for reasons of expediency. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
other one Posted February 17, 2017 Group: Worthy Ministers Followers: 29 Topic Count: 596 Topics Per Day: 0.08 Content Count: 56,088 Content Per Day: 7.56 Reputation: 27,829 Days Won: 271 Joined: 12/29/2003 Status: Offline Share Posted February 17, 2017 26 minutes ago, missmuffet said: We need to focus on Trump and Trump alone. No one else is in the WH now and governing the U.S. why should we just focus on Trump with mess that Obama has left there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts