missmuffet Posted February 17, 2017 Group: Royal Member Followers: 34 Topic Count: 1,990 Topics Per Day: 0.48 Content Count: 48,688 Content Per Day: 11.83 Reputation: 30,343 Days Won: 226 Joined: 01/11/2013 Status: Offline Share Posted February 17, 2017 Just now, HisFirst said: OK, I see. That's true for any party supporter though isn't it. Actually, its human nature - if you like someone and you hear "bad things" about them, you don't want to know...so I understand completely - we've all done it. You have to put yourself in the position to observe the whole picture and be brave enough to take in the truth. What is really happening here even if I do not want to see it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Running Gator Posted February 17, 2017 Group: Royal Member * Followers: 8 Topic Count: 91 Topics Per Day: 0.03 Content Count: 10,596 Content Per Day: 3.70 Reputation: 2,743 Days Won: 25 Joined: 06/16/2016 Status: Offline Share Posted February 17, 2017 15 minutes ago, SavedByGrace1981 said: Since leaks are in the news, I assumed it was. (lousy cold has messed up my thinking.) If it wasn't leaked but was there for all to see, then to me that's problematic as well. It should have been confidential. I think documents that are mere 'proposals' and will likely never be implemented should be kept confidential - otherwise (to use a favorite leftist phrase) there is a 'chilling effect'. Blessings, -Ed There is nothing in it to warrant making it confidential. These sorts of things always seem to find their way to daylight. Remember the Military's plan for the zombie apocalypse? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Running Gator Posted February 17, 2017 Group: Royal Member * Followers: 8 Topic Count: 91 Topics Per Day: 0.03 Content Count: 10,596 Content Per Day: 3.70 Reputation: 2,743 Days Won: 25 Joined: 06/16/2016 Status: Offline Share Posted February 17, 2017 1 hour ago, Out of the Shadows said: And the title of the article from the AP is..."DHS weighed Nat Guard for immigration roundups". So, tell me what part of that is fake? Please explain to me how the article is fake? here is the whole thing...https://apnews.com/5508111d59554a33be8001bdac4ef830/AP-Exclusive:-DHS-weighed-Nat-Guard-for-immigration-roundups Tell me what parts in it are not correct. Still waiting for one of the Trump folks to explain how this is fake news... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Running Gator Posted February 17, 2017 Group: Royal Member * Followers: 8 Topic Count: 91 Topics Per Day: 0.03 Content Count: 10,596 Content Per Day: 3.70 Reputation: 2,743 Days Won: 25 Joined: 06/16/2016 Status: Offline Share Posted February 17, 2017 2 minutes ago, Davida said: There is such a brain-washing going on by the liberal mainstream media, and then circulated on the Biased social media, it's totally unreliable without extra vetting and scrutinizing it. Some of us began unplugging from it it as the only source of "News Reports " 8yrs ago, and I think we are way better off then those who are only fed a steady diet of the left's narratives and bent views. What does this have to do with a factual story that has been falsely labeled as "fake news"? Since you are fed only a steady diet of the rights narratives and bent views you are no better off than those that get "fed" only from the left. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HisFirst Posted February 18, 2017 Group: Royal Member Followers: 21 Topic Count: 315 Topics Per Day: 0.11 Content Count: 3,491 Content Per Day: 1.26 Reputation: 2,582 Days Won: 3 Joined: 09/25/2016 Status: Offline Author Share Posted February 18, 2017 Just now, Cletus said: Hi Cletus, I'm not replying to your post but for some reason it has you at the top!!! Lol. I asked the question on another thread about a news article on Trump giving more power to police and my question was would he start using border control etc and the responses were that was more a military operation and no he woyldnt do that etc...this consideration seems to fit that notion actually. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MorningGlory Posted February 18, 2017 Group: Royal Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 1,022 Topics Per Day: 0.16 Content Count: 39,193 Content Per Day: 6.11 Reputation: 9,977 Days Won: 78 Joined: 10/01/2006 Status: Offline Share Posted February 18, 2017 4 hours ago, ENOCH2010 said: That is called bait, for leakers. I came to that same conclusion, Enoch. And, sure enough, it was leaked out to the media. If it was for real, I'm betting it wouldn't be shared with the lower level bureaucrats left over from the previous administration since Trump now knows he has moles everywhere.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Running Gator Posted February 18, 2017 Group: Royal Member * Followers: 8 Topic Count: 91 Topics Per Day: 0.03 Content Count: 10,596 Content Per Day: 3.70 Reputation: 2,743 Days Won: 25 Joined: 06/16/2016 Status: Offline Share Posted February 18, 2017 2 minutes ago, MorningGlory said: I came to that same conclusion, Enoch. And, sure enough, it was leaked out to the media. If it was for real, I'm betting it wouldn't be shared with the lower level bureaucrats left over from the previous administration since Trump now knows he has moles everywhere.. So, what you are saying is that back on Jan 25th they already had such a mole and leak problem they made a fake memo to use 3 weeks later to catch a leaker? WoW Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MorningGlory Posted February 18, 2017 Group: Royal Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 1,022 Topics Per Day: 0.16 Content Count: 39,193 Content Per Day: 6.11 Reputation: 9,977 Days Won: 78 Joined: 10/01/2006 Status: Offline Share Posted February 18, 2017 3 hours ago, Out of the Shadows said: What does this have to do with a factual story that has been falsely labeled as "fake news"? Since you are fed only a steady diet of the rights narratives and bent views you are no better off than those that get "fed" only from the left. Whoa....there's another one of those personal assessments you are so fond of making about people you don't know. Davida has said several times that she peruses several different news sources and you don't know what those are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MorningGlory Posted February 18, 2017 Group: Royal Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 1,022 Topics Per Day: 0.16 Content Count: 39,193 Content Per Day: 6.11 Reputation: 9,977 Days Won: 78 Joined: 10/01/2006 Status: Offline Share Posted February 18, 2017 Just now, Out of the Shadows said: So, what you are saying is that back on Jan 25th they already had such a mole and leak problem they made a fake memo to use 3 weeks later to catch a leaker? WoW the leakers have been working there for years so....yes. What's hard to follow there? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Running Gator Posted February 18, 2017 Group: Royal Member * Followers: 8 Topic Count: 91 Topics Per Day: 0.03 Content Count: 10,596 Content Per Day: 3.70 Reputation: 2,743 Days Won: 25 Joined: 06/16/2016 Status: Offline Share Posted February 18, 2017 Just now, MorningGlory said: the leakers have been working there for years so....yes. What's hard to follow there? Please offer some evidence to back up your claim. Oh and even though you will not do it, I am still waiting for you to show which part of the AP article was false. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts