MorningGlory Posted February 28, 2017 Group: Royal Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 1,022 Topics Per Day: 0.16 Content Count: 39,193 Content Per Day: 6.11 Reputation: 9,977 Days Won: 78 Joined: 10/01/2006 Status: Offline Share Posted February 28, 2017 For anyone still naive enough to believe there are no problems on our southern border..... http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/02/27/agents-detail-daily-border-fence-battle-seek-post-obama-restart.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jewels7 Posted February 28, 2017 Group: Senior Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 19 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 713 Content Per Day: 0.27 Reputation: 351 Days Won: 0 Joined: 02/10/2017 Status: Offline Share Posted February 28, 2017 Remember when Obama put Arizona up to the United Nations due to their state law concerning illegal immigration prosecution? He claimed it was a human rights violation. A president that charged a state with human rights violations after their legislature drafted an illegal immigrant law and policy of pursuit and prosecution. Based on the federal model! That in itself was another tell as to Obama's intentions in weakening this country to the benefit of its enemies. I also remember the flag day ceremony where his wife leaned in and said, "all this for that damn flag!" I read lips. Obama nodded while clapping like he was expected to before the public that watched. Michelle should have covered her mouth so that those watching didn't see a deplorable first lady speak. Now Trump has to clean up Obama's mess and strengthen this nation where Obama sought to make us weak. And all while fighting Obama implants who are here intent on continuing Obama's legacy the same as Hillary would have had she been elected. Personally, I'm for prosecution and deterrent policy. No one is above the law. Arrest the enemies of this country no matter what office they hold. And make them accountable under the law that describes their betrayal as worthy of prosecution. Send a message that we the people includes those among us who think themselves fit to lead. And when they prove themselves unfit they're held to answer for it just like any one of us would be would we have put this nation at risk before our enemies. Both foreign and domestic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Running Gator Posted February 28, 2017 Group: Royal Member * Followers: 8 Topic Count: 91 Topics Per Day: 0.03 Content Count: 10,596 Content Per Day: 3.69 Reputation: 2,743 Days Won: 25 Joined: 06/16/2016 Status: Offline Share Posted February 28, 2017 If our country is under assault then the military needs to do it's job and provide for the common defense of our nation. Is there any more of a common defense than the defense of the very borders that make up the nation? Why do we have troops sitting in German and Italy and all over Europe instead of home protecting our own country? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SavedByGrace1981 Posted February 28, 2017 Group: Royal Member Followers: 6 Topic Count: 104 Topics Per Day: 0.02 Content Count: 2,923 Content Per Day: 0.61 Reputation: 462 Days Won: 2 Joined: 04/02/2011 Status: Offline Birthday: 03/22/1953 Share Posted February 28, 2017 3 minutes ago, Out of the Shadows said: If our country is under assault then the military needs to do it's job and provide for the common defense of our nation. Is there any more of a common defense than the defense of the very borders that make up the nation? Why do we have troops sitting in German and Italy and all over Europe instead of home protecting our own country? Blessings, -Ed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MorningGlory Posted February 28, 2017 Group: Royal Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 1,022 Topics Per Day: 0.16 Content Count: 39,193 Content Per Day: 6.11 Reputation: 9,977 Days Won: 78 Joined: 10/01/2006 Status: Offline Author Share Posted February 28, 2017 2 hours ago, Jewels7 said: Remember when Obama put Arizona up to the United Nations due to their state law concerning illegal immigration prosecution? He claimed it was a human rights violation. A president that charged a state with human rights violations after their legislature drafted an illegal immigrant law and policy of pursuit and prosecution. Based on the federal model! That in itself was another tell as to Obama's intentions in weakening this country to the benefit of its enemies. I didn't used to believe that Obama was an enemy of the state until I began to look backwards and put all his actions together. I believe it now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jewels7 Posted February 28, 2017 Group: Senior Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 19 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 713 Content Per Day: 0.27 Reputation: 351 Days Won: 0 Joined: 02/10/2017 Status: Offline Share Posted February 28, 2017 3 hours ago, MorningGlory said: I didn't used to believe that Obama was an enemy of the state until I began to look backwards and put all his actions together. I believe it now. My upset is that I voted for him on his second run. Because Romney was just not acceptable. And I felt I had to give a voice even in a blue state. I'll get over it eventually. I saw a meme the other day that said: Once you realize Barack Obama hates America everything he's done will make sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jewels7 Posted February 28, 2017 Group: Senior Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 19 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 713 Content Per Day: 0.27 Reputation: 351 Days Won: 0 Joined: 02/10/2017 Status: Offline Share Posted February 28, 2017 6 hours ago, Out of the Shadows said: If our country is under assault then the military needs to do it's job and provide for the common defense of our nation. Is there any more of a common defense than the defense of the very borders that make up the nation? Why do we have troops sitting in German and Italy and all over Europe instead of home protecting our own country? Because our enemies are willing to swim far from home. Overseas doesn't mean out of reach. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Running Gator Posted February 28, 2017 Group: Royal Member * Followers: 8 Topic Count: 91 Topics Per Day: 0.03 Content Count: 10,596 Content Per Day: 3.69 Reputation: 2,743 Days Won: 25 Joined: 06/16/2016 Status: Offline Share Posted February 28, 2017 1 hour ago, Jewels7 said: Because our enemies are willing to swim far from home. Overseas doesn't mean out of reach. And when they swim here and get out of the water, we kill them. There is nothing in our constitution about providing for the common defense of German and France and Italy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OneLight Posted February 28, 2017 Group: Royal Member Followers: 22 Topic Count: 1,294 Topics Per Day: 0.21 Content Count: 31,762 Content Per Day: 5.23 Reputation: 9,760 Days Won: 115 Joined: 09/14/2007 Status: Offline Share Posted February 28, 2017 30 minutes ago, Out of the Shadows said: And when they swim here and get out of the water, we kill them. There is nothing in our constitution about providing for the common defense of German and France and Italy. Really? Tell me you are not serious with your comment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Running Gator Posted March 1, 2017 Group: Royal Member * Followers: 8 Topic Count: 91 Topics Per Day: 0.03 Content Count: 10,596 Content Per Day: 3.69 Reputation: 2,743 Days Won: 25 Joined: 06/16/2016 Status: Offline Share Posted March 1, 2017 12 minutes ago, OneLight said: Really? Tell me you are not serious with your comment. Just responding to the point made in the post I replied to. I do not think that we will have the enemy swimming up on our shores like the South Koreans have to worry about. But I am 100% serious about the military defending our border, and I have been since my time in the military. It is inconceivable to me that we would sacrifice our people in places like Vietnam and Iraq and now maybe Syria but we won't use them to actually defend the country. If defending the borders is not the very textbook definition of "common defense" I do not know what would be. People are willing to waste 20 or more billion dollars plus upkeep to build a monstrosity but they all freak out at the idea of the military doing what they should be doing. Just makes no sense Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts