Jump to content
IGNORED

U.S. Nukes just got a whole lot deadlier


MorningGlory

Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  1,022
  • Topics Per Day:  0.16
  • Content Count:  39,193
  • Content Per Day:  6.14
  • Reputation:   9,977
  • Days Won:  78
  • Joined:  10/01/2006
  • Status:  Offline

32 minutes ago, other one said:

Fukushima is actually much worse than a nuclear weapons explosion. 

How so, OO?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Worthy Ministers
  • Followers:  9
  • Topic Count:  92
  • Topics Per Day:  0.03
  • Content Count:  2,156
  • Content Per Day:  0.67
  • Reputation:   1,716
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  05/19/2015
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  11/10/1961

2 hours ago, other one said:

Fukushima is actually much worse than a nuclear weapons explosion. 

True, but everyone will still get to share the fallout from both. They're still picking up radiation from Fukashima that's managed to cross the Pacific. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Worthy Ministers
  • Followers:  9
  • Topic Count:  92
  • Topics Per Day:  0.03
  • Content Count:  2,156
  • Content Per Day:  0.67
  • Reputation:   1,716
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  05/19/2015
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  11/10/1961

3 hours ago, MorningGlory said:

How so, OO?

Good possibility (now that I think about it) is that Fukashima is basically still going on. Its still leaking radiation into the environment making it worse than, say, a one time even like a nuclear warhead going off. The explosion releases however much radiation and other stuff into the environment and then its done unlike the nuclear plant. They are still trying to find some of the melted fuel in one of those reactors last article I read, but the radiation keeps killing the robots they send in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Servant
  • Followers:  25
  • Topic Count:  275
  • Topics Per Day:  0.05
  • Content Count:  5,208
  • Content Per Day:  1.00
  • Reputation:   1,893
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  01/02/2010
  • Status:  Offline

3 hours ago, other one said:

Fukushima is actually much worse than a nuclear weapons explosion. 

No, it is not. A modern hydrogen warhead would have annihilated everything near fukushima and also left quite a bit of "fallout" so to speak. They are estimating future cancer cases due to the meltdown in the hundreds and there were no fatalities. There is no comparison.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Worthy Ministers
  • Followers:  29
  • Topic Count:  593
  • Topics Per Day:  0.08
  • Content Count:  55,868
  • Content Per Day:  7.55
  • Reputation:   27,622
  • Days Won:  271
  • Joined:  12/29/2003
  • Status:  Offline

the reactors are polluting the entire pacific ocean...     true a warhead will do more damage in the first fifteen seconds, but the nuclear fuel is burned and what is left is some radioactive by products.

The nuclear fuel is still intact and burning at all 4 of the reactors and in at least one of them has burned into the ground and is polluting the water and leaking into the ocean.   I don't know how much you all are keeping up with it, but there are serious fish genetic problems popping up all over the pacific ocean.....     we just haven't seen the worst of the damage from these reactors; it is far from over.     Most places where the destruction of a warhead is discussed they use the effects of the largest bombs produced back in the 60's and 70's in the neighborhood of 50 to  100 megaton explosions.....   but those things are much too large to deliver and most of the warheads are in the one to three megaton range and our tactical artillery are still in the kiloton range.

Here is the pattern of the reactor contamination I last read about and downloaded. 

 

235b2a1.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Worthy Ministers
  • Followers:  29
  • Topic Count:  593
  • Topics Per Day:  0.08
  • Content Count:  55,868
  • Content Per Day:  7.55
  • Reputation:   27,622
  • Days Won:  271
  • Joined:  12/29/2003
  • Status:  Offline


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  53
  • Topic Count:  88
  • Topics Per Day:  0.03
  • Content Count:  4,064
  • Content Per Day:  1.37
  • Reputation:   3,748
  • Days Won:  8
  • Joined:  02/23/2016
  • Status:  Offline

13 hours ago, other one said:

Fukushima is actually much worse than a nuclear weapons explosion. 

That's true. And lot of the water is radioactive and the fish is cancerous and not good to eat

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...