MorningGlory Posted March 14, 2017 Group: Royal Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 1,022 Topics Per Day: 0.16 Content Count: 39,193 Content Per Day: 6.12 Reputation: 9,977 Days Won: 78 Joined: 10/01/2006 Status: Offline Share Posted March 14, 2017 The title of this article is a little misleading. It states a fossil HUMAN cranium in the headline but, if you read the article, you find that it was a NEANDERTHAL cranium that was found. Neanderthals were not of our species so they were not, therefore, human. It's interesting to read though because I, personally, didn't know that Neanderthals made and used tools. http://mashable.com/2017/03/13/human-fossil-evolution-portugal/#fLRfjSDzvEqt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Patriot21 Posted March 14, 2017 Group: Worthy Ministers Followers: 28 Topic Count: 338 Topics Per Day: 0.05 Content Count: 15,696 Content Per Day: 2.46 Reputation: 8,515 Days Won: 39 Joined: 10/25/2006 Status: Offline Birthday: 02/27/1985 Share Posted March 14, 2017 lol whats misleading is the date. Actually, neanderthals, were fully 100% human, and not a "evolutionary link" as some have presented. No, what is misleading is the date, which is an outright lie, as they have absolutly no scientific way of proving such a date, and it was most likely made up. https://answersingenesis.org/human-evolution/neanderthal/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jewels7 Posted March 14, 2017 Group: Senior Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 19 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 713 Content Per Day: 0.27 Reputation: 351 Days Won: 0 Joined: 02/10/2017 Status: Offline Share Posted March 14, 2017 Are there young earth opiners here? Just asking before delving further into the article. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Patriot21 Posted March 14, 2017 Group: Worthy Ministers Followers: 28 Topic Count: 338 Topics Per Day: 0.05 Content Count: 15,696 Content Per Day: 2.46 Reputation: 8,515 Days Won: 39 Joined: 10/25/2006 Status: Offline Birthday: 02/27/1985 Share Posted March 14, 2017 I am a biblical earther, which means yes I believe in the Biblical account of the earth being made in 7 consecutive 24 hour days about 6-10,000 years ago, and has been backed up by strong scientific evidence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
other one Posted March 14, 2017 Group: Worthy Ministers Followers: 29 Topic Count: 595 Topics Per Day: 0.08 Content Count: 56,027 Content Per Day: 7.56 Reputation: 27,768 Days Won: 271 Joined: 12/29/2003 Status: Offline Share Posted March 14, 2017 2 hours ago, Jewels7 said: Are there young earth opiners here? Just asking before delving further into the article. Thanks. yes there are and they will fight you tooth and toenail if you try and prove them wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jewels7 Posted March 14, 2017 Group: Senior Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 19 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 713 Content Per Day: 0.27 Reputation: 351 Days Won: 0 Joined: 02/10/2017 Status: Offline Share Posted March 14, 2017 I'd not even think to expend the effort. If dated fossils millions of years old aren't convincing that's pretty self assured. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Patriot21 Posted March 15, 2017 Group: Worthy Ministers Followers: 28 Topic Count: 338 Topics Per Day: 0.05 Content Count: 15,696 Content Per Day: 2.46 Reputation: 8,515 Days Won: 39 Joined: 10/25/2006 Status: Offline Birthday: 02/27/1985 Share Posted March 15, 2017 6 hours ago, Jewels7 said: I'd not even think to expend the effort. If dated fossils millions of years old aren't convincing that's pretty self assured. the problem is the dating methods, are highly innacurate-if not false. https://answersingenesis.org/geology/carbon-14/doesnt-carbon-14-dating-disprove-the-bible/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jewels7 Posted March 15, 2017 Group: Senior Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 19 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 713 Content Per Day: 0.27 Reputation: 351 Days Won: 0 Joined: 02/10/2017 Status: Offline Share Posted March 15, 2017 22 hours ago, The_Patriot2017 said: the problem is the dating methods, are highly innacurate-if not false. https://answersingenesis.org/geology/carbon-14/doesnt-carbon-14-dating-disprove-the-bible/ There's going to be supporting arguments for the YE idea of course. The mistake as I see it is thinking in human terms of time and God's clock of creation. We believe 6 literal days and yet we're not even on God's calendar now. We're living according to man's calendars across the ages. Gregorian, etc... Earth is millions of years old, humanity is in the hundreds of thousands. We argue God created everything and then we conflict over whether or not God followed a literal 7 day week? As if time as we know it is infinite and universal. The bible tells us God doesn't think the way we do. We think God created according to our belief in clocked time? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OneLight Posted March 16, 2017 Group: Royal Member Followers: 22 Topic Count: 1,294 Topics Per Day: 0.21 Content Count: 31,762 Content Per Day: 5.24 Reputation: 9,760 Days Won: 115 Joined: 09/14/2007 Status: Offline Share Posted March 16, 2017 As I see it, man has become so smart, he became a fool in the biblical sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kindle Posted March 16, 2017 Group: Royal Member Followers: 53 Topic Count: 88 Topics Per Day: 0.03 Content Count: 4,064 Content Per Day: 1.37 Reputation: 3,748 Days Won: 8 Joined: 02/23/2016 Status: Offline Share Posted March 16, 2017 On 3/14/2017 at 11:13 AM, The_Patriot2017 said: I am a biblical earthed, which means yes I believe in the Biblical account of the earth being made in 7 consecutive 24 hour days about 6-10,000 years ago, and has been backed up by strong scientific evidence. 1 day is as 1,000 years to God. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts