ruck1b Posted March 21, 2017 Group: Removed from Forums for Breaking Terms of Service Followers: 0 Topic Count: 24 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 352 Content Per Day: 0.11 Reputation: 128 Days Won: 0 Joined: 06/18/2015 Status: Offline Share Posted March 21, 2017 Fox News Channel has pulled legal analyst Andrew Napolitano from the air after disavowing his on-air claim that British intelligence officials had helped former President Barack Obama spy on Donald Trump http://chicago.suntimes.com/news/fox-pulls-napolitano-from-air-after-trump-report/amp/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Running Gator Posted March 21, 2017 Group: Royal Member * Followers: 8 Topic Count: 91 Topics Per Day: 0.03 Content Count: 10,596 Content Per Day: 3.70 Reputation: 2,743 Days Won: 25 Joined: 06/16/2016 Status: Offline Share Posted March 21, 2017 2 minutes ago, ruck1b said: Fox News Channel has pulled legal analyst Andrew Napolitano from the air after disavowing his on-air claim that British intelligence officials had helped former President Barack Obama spy on Donald Trump http://chicago.suntimes.com/news/fox-pulls-napolitano-from-air-after-trump-report/amp/ It will be a short lived stunt to pretend they care about accuracy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BacKaran Posted March 21, 2017 Share Posted March 21, 2017 Hmmm, interesting.Napolitano I like, Comey not so much... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Running Gator Posted March 21, 2017 Group: Royal Member * Followers: 8 Topic Count: 91 Topics Per Day: 0.03 Content Count: 10,596 Content Per Day: 3.70 Reputation: 2,743 Days Won: 25 Joined: 06/16/2016 Status: Offline Share Posted March 21, 2017 People tend to like those how tell them things they already believe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MorningGlory Posted March 21, 2017 Group: Royal Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 1,022 Topics Per Day: 0.16 Content Count: 39,193 Content Per Day: 6.11 Reputation: 9,977 Days Won: 78 Joined: 10/01/2006 Status: Offline Share Posted March 21, 2017 2 hours ago, ruck1b said: Fox News Channel has pulled legal analyst Andrew Napolitano from the air after disavowing his on-air claim that British intelligence officials had helped former President Barack Obama spy on Donald Trump http://chicago.suntimes.com/news/fox-pulls-napolitano-from-air-after-trump-report/amp/ I'm surprised at the judge being so loose with the truth; usually he knows what he's talking about. I never believed the British involvement in this whole thing, btw. Why would the FBI, the best law enforcement agency in the world, resort to outside sources? The judge has really put his credibility on the line here. But, at least Fox took action...unlike some the MSM networks who just shovel garbage day in and day out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BacKaran Posted March 22, 2017 Share Posted March 22, 2017 I agree GM.? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Churchmouse Posted March 22, 2017 Group: Diamond Member Followers: 4 Topic Count: 91 Topics Per Day: 0.03 Content Count: 2,216 Content Per Day: 0.80 Reputation: 1,014 Days Won: 0 Joined: 09/29/2016 Status: Offline Birthday: 04/02/1958 Share Posted March 22, 2017 I heard that he claimed that he heard it from outside sources. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MorningGlory Posted March 22, 2017 Group: Royal Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 1,022 Topics Per Day: 0.16 Content Count: 39,193 Content Per Day: 6.11 Reputation: 9,977 Days Won: 78 Joined: 10/01/2006 Status: Offline Share Posted March 22, 2017 1 hour ago, Churchmouse said: I heard that he claimed that he heard it from outside sources. Hmmmm....I didn't even see the show where he made the claim so.... I DO think that 'outside sources' can really burn someone if they're not careful. IOW, he should have done his homework. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Running Gator Posted March 22, 2017 Group: Royal Member * Followers: 8 Topic Count: 91 Topics Per Day: 0.03 Content Count: 10,596 Content Per Day: 3.70 Reputation: 2,743 Days Won: 25 Joined: 06/16/2016 Status: Offline Share Posted March 22, 2017 Judge Nap has always espoused a wide range of CTs going back to his days as a regular on the Hannity radio show. It has never been a problem for FoxNews before, but this is the first time we have a president and a press secretary that use FoxNews for their daily intelligence briefings. It is very likely FoxNews got a call from the White House upset that they had embarrassed them and they needed to punish the judge accordingly. Of course the judge could have tried to use the "Trump defense" and point out that if the POTUS can post lies on Twitter then why can't he do so on Fox. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Radiant_Owl Posted March 23, 2017 Group: Advanced Member Followers: 2 Topic Count: 15 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 299 Content Per Day: 0.12 Reputation: 178 Days Won: 0 Joined: 03/16/2017 Status: Offline Share Posted March 23, 2017 On 3/21/2017 at 1:50 PM, MorningGlory said: I'm surprised at the judge being so loose with the truth; usually he knows what he's talking about. I never believed the British involvement in this whole thing, btw. Why would the FBI, the best law enforcement agency in the world, resort to outside sources? The judge has really put his credibility on the line here. But, at least Fox took action...unlike some the MSM networks who just shovel garbage day in and day out. Why? No linkage. Plausible deniability. Untraceable commiseration. Why was a young woman's body found years ago on the grounds of the palace? That reported but no follow-up. Why was a pregnancy test on Princess Diana delivered by private security courier to Windsor palace less than two hours after her death? Come on. If a judge is typically credible why would he make a public statement like this? To let people know something regardless of the risk because the cover-up is immense? Do we really think everything that goes on is public knowledge through apt reporting? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts