ruck1b Posted March 29, 2017 Group: Removed from Forums for Breaking Terms of Service Followers: 0 Topic Count: 24 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 352 Content Per Day: 0.11 Reputation: 128 Days Won: 0 Joined: 06/18/2015 Status: Offline Share Posted March 29, 2017 More than 180,000 people have signed a petition encouraging first lady Melania Trump to live in the White House or begin paying for the additional security costs stemming from her living at Trump Tower in New York. As of 10 a.m. Wednesday, 180,601 supporters had signed the Change.org petition. CBS previously reported the petition would be delivered to Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders and Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren if at least 150,000 signed the pledge, although it remains unclear if that actually occurred. http://www.firstcoastnews.com/news/petition-aims-to-have-melania-trump-move-into-white-house-or-pay-for-own-security/426527993 I just need 100k a day for about 6 months. I will continue to work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest shiloh357 Posted March 29, 2017 Share Posted March 29, 2017 She is already moving to the White House at the end of the school year in month or two. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ruck1b Posted March 29, 2017 Group: Removed from Forums for Breaking Terms of Service Followers: 0 Topic Count: 24 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 352 Content Per Day: 0.11 Reputation: 128 Days Won: 0 Joined: 06/18/2015 Status: Offline Author Share Posted March 29, 2017 17 minutes ago, shiloh357 said: She is already moving to the White House at the end of the school year in month or two. So then trump should pay for the security. He is a billionaire. But hey, lets worry about food stamps and those poor people "living off of government assistance". That seems to be the rally cry of many on the "right" who swear up and down they are fiscally responsible, but then hypocritically ignore this irresponsibility. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MorningGlory Posted March 29, 2017 Group: Royal Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 1,022 Topics Per Day: 0.16 Content Count: 39,193 Content Per Day: 6.14 Reputation: 9,977 Days Won: 78 Joined: 10/01/2006 Status: Offline Share Posted March 29, 2017 36 minutes ago, ruck1b said: So then trump should pay for the security. He is a billionaire. But hey, lets worry about food stamps and those poor people "living off of government assistance". That seems to be the rally cry of many on the "right" who swear up and down they are fiscally responsible, but then hypocritically ignore this irresponsibility. I reside on the 'right' and I don't disregard the huge costs of protecting the First Family. She will be moving to the White House in a few weeks. No one ever complained about protecting any other First Family so why now? Why are the Trumps not as important as all those who came before? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Patriot21 Posted March 29, 2017 Group: Worthy Ministers Followers: 28 Topic Count: 338 Topics Per Day: 0.05 Content Count: 15,673 Content Per Day: 2.46 Reputation: 8,494 Days Won: 39 Joined: 10/25/2006 Status: Offline Birthday: 02/27/1985 Share Posted March 29, 2017 Oh please this again. Trump made a wise move to help keep the transition smooth for his family, and she will be moving to the white house as soon as the election is over. And the added security, really, is miniscule compared to the big picture. This is nothing more then the left grasping at straws in a meaningless smear campaign, because they in reality, dont have anything better to do with their time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tea Ess Posted March 29, 2017 Group: Advanced Member Followers: 2 Topic Count: 7 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 312 Content Per Day: 0.12 Reputation: 140 Days Won: 0 Joined: 12/10/2016 Status: Offline Birthday: 09/05/1998 Share Posted March 29, 2017 56 minutes ago, The_Patriot2017 said: Oh please this again. Trump made a wise move to help keep the transition smooth for his family, and she will be moving to the white house as soon as the election is over. And the added security, really, is miniscule compared to the big picture. This is nothing more then the left grasping at straws in a meaningless smear campaign, because they in reality, dont have anything better to do with their time. The Trump family should be trying to minimize the expense of security. If we're going to be cutting government waste, nothing should be immune to scrutiny. A good place to start would be not taking so many vacations at Mar-a-Lago. That would save taxpayers millions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Patriot21 Posted March 29, 2017 Group: Worthy Ministers Followers: 28 Topic Count: 338 Topics Per Day: 0.05 Content Count: 15,673 Content Per Day: 2.46 Reputation: 8,494 Days Won: 39 Joined: 10/25/2006 Status: Offline Birthday: 02/27/1985 Share Posted March 29, 2017 1 hour ago, Tea Ess said: The Trump family should be trying to minimize the expense of security. If we're going to be cutting government waste, nothing should be immune to scrutiny. A good place to start would be not taking so many vacations at Mar-a-Lago. That would save taxpayers millions. It's such a week excuse. All those secret service agents are getting paid the same regardless of where they are at. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LadyKay Posted March 30, 2017 Group: Royal Member Followers: 12 Topic Count: 385 Topics Per Day: 0.10 Content Count: 7,692 Content Per Day: 1.94 Reputation: 4,809 Days Won: 3 Joined: 05/28/2013 Status: Offline Share Posted March 30, 2017 2 hours ago, Tea Ess said: The Trump family should be trying to minimize the expense of security. If we're going to be cutting government waste, nothing should be immune to scrutiny. A good place to start would be not taking so many vacations at Mar-a-Lago. That would save taxpayers millions. Well you see you got to understand, that Trump is fine when it comes to cutting funds to programs for old people and after school stuff. But when it comes to cutting funding for himself, well that's another story. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest shiloh357 Posted March 30, 2017 Share Posted March 30, 2017 4 minutes ago, LadyKay said: Well you see you got to understand, that Trump is fine when it comes to cutting funds to programs for old people and after school stuff. But when it comes to cutting funding for himself, well that's another story. He is not taking a salary. The IRS says he must take at least a $1 salary. That's saving a lot of money over duration of his presidency. The millions spent on his security would be same even if the SS agents were all in one place. They get paid the same regardless. They actually have less security agents for Trump as they are understaffed at this time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tea Ess Posted March 30, 2017 Group: Advanced Member Followers: 2 Topic Count: 7 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 312 Content Per Day: 0.12 Reputation: 140 Days Won: 0 Joined: 12/10/2016 Status: Offline Birthday: 09/05/1998 Share Posted March 30, 2017 A few hundred thousand dollars a year is nothing compared to the millions being spent on vacations. The local areas also provide security, no it's not all the secret service. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts