Anonymous Aristotle Posted June 25, 2017 Group: Senior Member Followers: 4 Topic Count: 18 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 907 Content Per Day: 0.36 Reputation: 264 Days Won: 0 Joined: 06/10/2017 Status: Offline Share Posted June 25, 2017 1 hour ago, other one said: actually the constitution is pretty strict on what it lets the Federal Government do.... and if it is not granted in the constitution the states do not have to abide by federal laws..... and Oklahoma has put the Federal Government on notice that we will not do so.... Come time Oklahoma, the proof shall be in the pudding. Supremacy Clause Article VI All debts contracted and engagements entered into, before the adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this Constitution, as under the Confederation. This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding. The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the members of the several state legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers, both of the United States and of the several states, shall be bound by oath or affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Patriot21 Posted June 25, 2017 Group: Worthy Ministers Followers: 28 Topic Count: 338 Topics Per Day: 0.05 Content Count: 15,703 Content Per Day: 2.46 Reputation: 8,519 Days Won: 39 Joined: 10/25/2006 Status: Offline Birthday: 02/27/1985 Share Posted June 25, 2017 2 hours ago, Anonymous Aristotle said: It shouldn't but it does. That's the reality. I do believe I said that. I also said I'm always going to take the states side every time...and I won't encourage federal over reach on principal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anonymous Aristotle Posted June 25, 2017 Group: Senior Member Followers: 4 Topic Count: 18 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 907 Content Per Day: 0.36 Reputation: 264 Days Won: 0 Joined: 06/10/2017 Status: Offline Share Posted June 25, 2017 2 minutes ago, The_Patriot2017 said: I do believe I said that. I also said I'm always going to take the states side every time...and I won't encourage federal over reach on principal. I wasn't arguing that you didn't. I simply pointed out that regardless of a persons , would rather, it is reality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts