Reinitin Posted August 12, 2017 Group: Diamond Member Followers: 13 Topic Count: 51 Topics Per Day: 0.02 Content Count: 2,366 Content Per Day: 0.78 Reputation: 2,150 Days Won: 9 Joined: 01/10/2016 Status: Offline Share Posted August 12, 2017 29 minutes ago, OldSchool2 said: They are what? philisophical editorials are an expression of personal thoughts, opinons or views by providing contrasting or complementing examples to justify ones opinion. "fake news" philisophical editorials disguised and represented by publishers as scholarly journalism. publishers used to place a "not the thoughts or views of the publisher" on all editorials and philisophic editorials but they stoped doing it so now we have alot of fake news. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reinitin Posted August 12, 2017 Group: Diamond Member Followers: 13 Topic Count: 51 Topics Per Day: 0.02 Content Count: 2,366 Content Per Day: 0.78 Reputation: 2,150 Days Won: 9 Joined: 01/10/2016 Status: Offline Share Posted August 12, 2017 44 minutes ago, OldSchool2 said: They are what? pre Bush news organization staff was about 90 scholarly journalism and 10 percent philisophical editorials. an example of a philisophical editorial would be Anne Landers column. They always identified philisophical editorials as writters opinion if an article didnt meet scholarly journalism rules. So now most our news organizations staff is about 80 percent Philisophical editorials. 80% of news organisations staff have Philosophy degrees in college not Journalism degrees. the are not following journalism rules and are not identifying the journalism as journalism and philisophical editorials as philisophical editorials. Journalism takes time to build a accurate report and interview sources and check facts. there is no accountability for philisoohical editorials because opinion is protected by the first adminment. they can just write wgat they think and spit out an article in 20 minutes. its cheeper to produce philisophical editorials then actually write scholarly journalism. undersrand? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest shiloh357 Posted August 12, 2017 Share Posted August 12, 2017 1 hour ago, OldSchool2 said: Are you surprised that I graduated top of my class at DINFOS. Or does that frighten you? No, it doesn't frighten me. It puzzles me. I would expect more mature, fact-based, objective,intellectually credible, less petty, and substantive posts from someone with that kind of education. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest shiloh357 Posted August 12, 2017 Share Posted August 12, 2017 1 hour ago, OldSchool2 said: If Prez Trump actually thought that, then why did he insist McConnell pass it through the Senate!!!!! The bill he said was mean, was the bill originally drafted by Congress, not the bill they ended up voting on and rejecting. I shouldnt' have to explain that to a so-called "journalist." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reinitin Posted August 12, 2017 Group: Diamond Member Followers: 13 Topic Count: 51 Topics Per Day: 0.02 Content Count: 2,366 Content Per Day: 0.78 Reputation: 2,150 Days Won: 9 Joined: 01/10/2016 Status: Offline Share Posted August 12, 2017 1 hour ago, OldSchool2 said: They are what? what i am saying..lol is be a scholarly journalist your self and follow the chain of eveidence without bias check creditablity of your sources source follow the rules if you want to be a creditable witness. otherwise be honest and identify opinions as opinion if you really havent done your home work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldSchool2 Posted August 13, 2017 Group: Royal Member Followers: 7 Topic Count: 701 Topics Per Day: 0.13 Content Count: 7,511 Content Per Day: 1.35 Reputation: 1,759 Days Won: 0 Joined: 01/16/2009 Status: Offline Birthday: 02/18/1955 Author Share Posted August 13, 2017 14 hours ago, Reinitin said: okay dick tracey:) here are the rules for creditable journalism according to top univercity's You're going to teach me journalism and you can't even spell? 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldSchool2 Posted August 13, 2017 Group: Royal Member Followers: 7 Topic Count: 701 Topics Per Day: 0.13 Content Count: 7,511 Content Per Day: 1.35 Reputation: 1,759 Days Won: 0 Joined: 01/16/2009 Status: Offline Birthday: 02/18/1955 Author Share Posted August 13, 2017 13 hours ago, shiloh357 said: The bill he said was mean, was the bill originally drafted by Congress.... It was the same bill passed by the House that couldn't pass muster in the Senate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldSchool2 Posted August 13, 2017 Group: Royal Member Followers: 7 Topic Count: 701 Topics Per Day: 0.13 Content Count: 7,511 Content Per Day: 1.35 Reputation: 1,759 Days Won: 0 Joined: 01/16/2009 Status: Offline Birthday: 02/18/1955 Author Share Posted August 13, 2017 13 hours ago, shiloh357 said: No, it doesn't frighten me. It puzzles me. I would expect more mature, fact-based, objective,intellectually credible, less petty, and substantive posts from someone with that kind of education. In other words, you don't care for what I have to say. Why doesn't that surprise me? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Running Gator Posted August 13, 2017 Group: Royal Member * Followers: 8 Topic Count: 91 Topics Per Day: 0.03 Content Count: 10,596 Content Per Day: 3.69 Reputation: 2,743 Days Won: 25 Joined: 06/16/2016 Status: Offline Share Posted August 13, 2017 15 hours ago, Reinitin said: what cracks me up is when he tweats his little campaign brand keyword promised to his base they know exactly what he is doing and saying and media and the socialist indoctrinated all get their panties in a wad:) you know when they get an inditement that can put a bullseye on hillary he is gonna tweet something the world makes all kinds of crazyness out of but his base will see the "lock her up" and celebrate. So, the Trump base responds to pre-implanted key word programing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reinitin Posted August 13, 2017 Group: Diamond Member Followers: 13 Topic Count: 51 Topics Per Day: 0.02 Content Count: 2,366 Content Per Day: 0.78 Reputation: 2,150 Days Won: 9 Joined: 01/10/2016 Status: Offline Share Posted August 13, 2017 4 hours ago, OldSchool2 said: You're going to teach me journalism and you can't even spell? I can spell just not on a tiny touch screan keyboard with long finger bails and text to small to proof read. but, I figure intelligent people aren't to mentalky lazy to figure it out in a glance. if you kniw the differand then why are you presenting philisophical editorials as creditable sources to usurp an intellectual superior grand stand position? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts