Jump to content
IGNORED

Even a limited nuclear war could trigger nuclear winter and global famine


MorningGlory

Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  1,022
  • Topics Per Day:  0.16
  • Content Count:  39,193
  • Content Per Day:  6.11
  • Reputation:   9,977
  • Days Won:  78
  • Joined:  10/01/2006
  • Status:  Offline

This is a sobering article, for sure.  Using nukes is not something we want to take lightly or allow ourselves to be held hostage by.  It's a hard situation.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/even-limited-nuclear-war-could-144500918.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Worthy Ministers
  • Followers:  44
  • Topic Count:  6,178
  • Topics Per Day:  0.88
  • Content Count:  43,795
  • Content Per Day:  6.21
  • Reputation:   11,243
  • Days Won:  58
  • Joined:  01/03/2005
  • Status:  Offline

Warning sarcasm mode ahead:

This should make all the climate change folks happy. No more global warming. 

 

 

Beyond that, the toll on people is sobering. One only has to look at the effects of the nukes in ww ii, the nuke plant meltdowns at chernobyl and fukushima, and the way of life for people in kazakhstan to see just how bad a limited or full scale war could be. 

  • Loved it! 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Worthy Ministers
  • Followers:  29
  • Topic Count:  596
  • Topics Per Day:  0.08
  • Content Count:  56,063
  • Content Per Day:  7.55
  • Reputation:   27,811
  • Days Won:  271
  • Joined:  12/29/2003
  • Status:  Online

7 hours ago, ayin jade said:

Warning sarcasm mode ahead:

This should make all the climate change folks happy. No more global warming. 

 

 

Beyond that, the toll on people is sobering. One only has to look at the effects of the nukes in ww ii, the nuke plant meltdowns at chernobyl and fukushima, and the way of life for people in kazakhstan to see just how bad a limited or full scale war could be. 

I don't think we've even seen the worst of Fukushima yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  1,022
  • Topics Per Day:  0.16
  • Content Count:  39,193
  • Content Per Day:  6.11
  • Reputation:   9,977
  • Days Won:  78
  • Joined:  10/01/2006
  • Status:  Offline

13 hours ago, ayin jade said:

Warning sarcasm mode ahead:

This should make all the climate change folks happy. No more global warming. 

 

 

Beyond that, the toll on people is sobering. One only has to look at the effects of the nukes in ww ii, the nuke plant meltdowns at chernobyl and fukushima, and the way of life for people in kazakhstan to see just how bad a limited or full scale war could be. 

Yes.  For the first time in a LONG time I am, personally, looking at the possible consequences of such a war.  Those in our government who allowed NK to get to this point bear the responsibility if they use nukes.  It should have been stopped 25 years ago.

  • Loved it! 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Worthy Ministers
  • Followers:  9
  • Topic Count:  92
  • Topics Per Day:  0.03
  • Content Count:  2,164
  • Content Per Day:  0.66
  • Reputation:   1,727
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  05/19/2015
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  11/10/1961

8 hours ago, other one said:

I don't think we've even seen the worst of Fukushima yet.

Sadly, I think you may be right.

It also illustrates something I hope the leadership on all sides will notice: use a nuclear warhead and everyone on the planet gets to share in the fallout. Literally. The leakage from Chernobyl and Fukushima are illustrate what happens once the radiation genie gets out of the bottle. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member *
  • Followers:  8
  • Topic Count:  91
  • Topics Per Day:  0.03
  • Content Count:  10,596
  • Content Per Day:  3.70
  • Reputation:   2,743
  • Days Won:  25
  • Joined:  06/16/2016
  • Status:  Offline

14 minutes ago, walla299 said:

Sadly, I think you may be right.

It also illustrates something I hope the leadership on all sides will notice: use a nuclear warhead and everyone on the planet gets to share in the fallout. Literally. The leakage from Chernobyl and Fukushima are illustrate what happens once the radiation genie gets out of the bottle. 

Not to mention that our use of them again would open the floodgate for more and more "limited" use of them by all who have them.

There would be no going back.

Edited by Running Gator
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Worthy Ministers
  • Followers:  29
  • Topic Count:  596
  • Topics Per Day:  0.08
  • Content Count:  56,063
  • Content Per Day:  7.55
  • Reputation:   27,811
  • Days Won:  271
  • Joined:  12/29/2003
  • Status:  Online

20 minutes ago, walla299 said:

Sadly, I think you may be right.

It also illustrates something I hope the leadership on all sides will notice: use a nuclear warhead and everyone on the planet gets to share in the fallout. Literally. The leakage from Chernobyl and Fukushima are illustrate what happens once the radiation genie gets out of the bottle. 

Problem there is that those disasters are much worse than a bomb.  The nuclear fuel is burned and consumed in a bomb, but the power plant disasters the fuel is still there and we may never be free of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...