Jump to content
IGNORED

Has Science been hijacked?


opportunitykenny

Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Advanced Member
  • Followers:  2
  • Topic Count:  32
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  149
  • Content Per Day:  0.04
  • Reputation:   40
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  07/27/2013
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  05/16/1980

Science is good considering the benefits of it but if it should be in the wrong hands, God forbid that we settle for what it is bad.

My interest is to know whether Science has been hijacked. If yes, how? And what can be done at micro and macro level? If no, what are the proofs? For instance, what percentage (roughly) of the past and the present renowned scientists were/are really and genuinelly christians?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Science has been hijacked since day one, the moment Adam and Eve partook of the Forbidden Fruit.

That was the goal of the Serpent... to take control of it...

2 Corinthians 4:4
"In whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine unto them"

He is now "God of this World" and guides Mankind into creating all kinds of 'Devices' in order that we attempt to fulfil his ultimate goal of becoming God.

We are almost there.

Transhumanism's tender leaves are finally beginning to shoot forth after thousands of years of the Serpent's subtle influences...

Matthew 24:32
"Now learn a parable of the fig tree; When his branch is yet tender, and putteth forth leaves, ye know that summer is nigh"

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  11
  • Topic Count:  19
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  3,396
  • Content Per Day:  0.91
  • Reputation:   730
  • Days Won:  4
  • Joined:  12/21/2013
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  12/26/1963

18 hours ago, opportunitykenny said:

Science is good considering the benefits of it but if it should be in the wrong hands, God forbid that we settle for what it is bad.

"Science" is The Scientific Method.  It's not: good, bad, attractive, big, small, sad, happy, ect ect.

 

Quote

My interest is to know whether Science has been hijacked.

Well yes and no.  

What has happened is people from the Pseudo-Sciences: astronomy, astrophysics, cosmology, paleontology, geology, anthropology, archaeology, evolutionary biology (lol), theoretical physics... 

Have performed a Clumsily Juvenile "Bait and Switch" Equivocation Fallacy with the term "Science" and ACTUAL Sciences -- (Those that follow The Scientific Method:  Quantum Mechanics/Biochemistry/Genetics) -- and call themselves "SCIENCES" by mere FIAT when they're NOT. Ironically, just like God warned us...

(1 Timothy 6:20) "O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called:"

Since the Fairytale Pseudo-Science Masqueraders know that the Joe Coffee and Betty Breadmaker Masses wouldn't know what ACTUAL "Science" was if it landed on their heads, spun around, and whistled dixie... they're afforded the courtesy to walk around pontificating and PRETENDING TO BE SOMETHING THEY'RE NOT !!!

That's where I come in and drop "THE HAMMER"!! :D

 

regards

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Advanced Member
  • Followers:  2
  • Topic Count:  32
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  149
  • Content Per Day:  0.04
  • Reputation:   40
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  07/27/2013
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  05/16/1980

4 hours ago, Base12 said:

Science has been hijacked since day one, the moment Adam and Eve partook of the Forbidden Fruit.

That was the goal of the Serpent... to take control of it...

If Science has been hijacked as said; do you consider it safe to use products of Science from evil scientists recognising the fact that they may subtly package little evil with products we may percieve as good?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  11
  • Topic Count:  19
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  3,396
  • Content Per Day:  0.91
  • Reputation:   730
  • Days Won:  4
  • Joined:  12/21/2013
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  12/26/1963

3 hours ago, opportunitykenny said:

If Science has been hijacked as said;

It hasn't been; Masqueraded is a more "Apt" description. (SEE: previous post)

 

Quote

do you consider it safe to use products of Science

There are no Products of "Science", save for Validated/Invalidated Hypotheses.

Science isn't Technology...

What Science Isn't, Part III: Science is not Technology:

"One of the mistakes many people make in thinking about science is to confuse it with technology. As a result, science often either receives undue credit (for the "miracles of modern science" in one's kitchen) or undue blame (for everything from overly firm tomatoes to nuclear war). In fact, science doesn't make things. Scientists developed the understanding of radiation sufficient for the invention of the microwave oven, but neither making a microwave oven nor using it are science. Scientists are in the business of generating knowledge, whereas engineers are in the business of generating technology... In short, science often leads to technology, and it often uses technology, but it isn't technology, and in fact it can operate quite independently of technology." http://www.gly.uga.edu/railsback/1122science3.html

 

regards

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Advanced Member
  • Followers:  2
  • Topic Count:  32
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  149
  • Content Per Day:  0.04
  • Reputation:   40
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  07/27/2013
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  05/16/1980

On Wednesday, August 16, 2017 at 11:58 PM, Enoch2021 said:

It hasn't been; Masqueraded is a more "Apt" description. (SEE: previous post)

 

There are no Products of "Science", save for Validated/Invalidated Hypotheses.

Science isn't Technology...

What Science Isn't, Part III: Science is not Technology:

"One of the mistakes many people make in thinking about science is to confuse it with technology. As a result, science often either receives undue credit (for the "miracles of modern science" in one's kitchen) or undue blame (for everything from overly firm tomatoes to nuclear war). In fact, science doesn't make things. Scientists developed the understanding of radiation sufficient for the invention of the microwave oven, but neither making a microwave oven nor using it are science. Scientists are in the business of generating knowledge, whereas engineers are in the business of generating technology... In short, science often leads to technology, and it often uses technology, but it isn't technology, and in fact it can operate quite independently of technology." http://www.gly.uga.edu/railsback/1122science3.html

 

regards

I surely know that scientific knowledge can breed concrete or abstract products, hope you understand this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  11
  • Topic Count:  19
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  3,396
  • Content Per Day:  0.91
  • Reputation:   730
  • Days Won:  4
  • Joined:  12/21/2013
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  12/26/1963

On 8/17/2017 at 7:13 PM, opportunitykenny said:

I surely know that scientific knowledge can breed concrete or abstract products, hope you understand this?

Before you were appealing to Science = 'ing Technology.  So after that got taken out back to the Woodshed and given "What For!!"...

Now it's Scientific Knowledge "Can Breed" :o concrete or abstract products, eh? :blink:

I could spend HOURS tearing just this apart.

But I'm getting tired, Look these up...

Moving The Goal Posts Fallacy

Reification Fallacy

 

regards

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...