Al Franken, Sexual Predator He’s already apologized, but so what?

[Guest shiloh357]

1 minute ago, other one said:

Far be it for me to stand up for Frankenstein but there is a huge difference if More is guilty between playing around with a grown woman and a 14 year old.

But is he guilty?  That is the real question.  I hear more out of Ryan and Mcconnel than I do the Democrats.  None of this is really about how women have been treated

 

There is a difference in that one is statutory rape.   But Moore is accused by 8 other women of sexual misconduct and they were not considered under aged at the time.  

In Franken's case and in Moore's case there are allegations of activities that were done without the consent of accuser.   Franken should be barred from serving in Congress if we go by the standard set by Moore's accusers.

[other one]

4 minutes ago, shiloh357 said:

There is a difference in that one is statutory rape.   But Moore is accused by 8 other women of sexual misconduct and they were not considered under aged at the time.  

In Franken's case and in Moore's case there are allegations of activities that were done without the consent of accuser.   Franken should be barred from serving in Congress if we go by the standard set by Moore's accusers.

And most likely half the People there or more.  But if we demand Frankenstein has to go then we set president with them that anyone accused can't be in congress.

[SavedByGrace1981]

I have a question:  When it comes to Al Franken, what should be the REAL outrage?

Satire website: Al Franken Didn't Do Nothing

When 1,099 felons vote in race won by 312 ballots

Blessings,

-Ed

[Guest shiloh357]

2 hours ago, other one said:

And most likely half the People there or more.  But if we demand Frankenstein has to go then we set president with them that anyone accused can't be in congress.

No, we set a precedent that no one who has been proven to have been sexual inappropriate can't be in Congress.   We have photographic proof when it comes to Franken.  

[MorningGlory]

3 hours ago, shiloh357 said:

There is a difference in that one is statutory rape.   But Moore is accused by 8 other women of sexual misconduct and they were not considered under aged at the time.  

In Franken's case and in Moore's case there are allegations of activities that were done without the consent of accuser.   Franken should be barred from serving in Congress if we go by the standard set by Moore's accusers.

Another woman has come out and accused Franken as of this morning. 

[other one]

5 hours ago, shiloh357 said:

No, we set a precedent that no one who has been proven to have been sexual inappropriate can't be in Congress.   We have photographic proof when it comes to Franken.  

I still say we should not push Franken until after the election.

[Guest shiloh357]

4 minutes ago, other one said:

I still say we should not push Franken until after the election.

Why?  Why not the same, even standard?

[other one]

9 minutes ago, shiloh357 said:

Why?  Why not the same, even standard?

because the more we push that right now the more we stand a chance of raising the enthusiasm of the democratic voters in the More election.....   we don't want to give them any more push to get mad and go vote.  May not sound like holding people to even standards, but it is prudent.....    we can deal with standards in three or four weeks.