Jump to content
IGNORED

Distant black hole holds surprises about the early universe


MorningGlory

Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  1,022
  • Topics Per Day:  0.16
  • Content Count:  39,193
  • Content Per Day:  6.11
  • Reputation:   9,977
  • Days Won:  78
  • Joined:  10/01/2006
  • Status:  Offline

Astronomers have discovered a giant 'black hole' millions of light years away that offers a glimpse into the universe as it was over thirteen billion years ago.  This is how God laid things out and I believe we are getting closer to being able to see that moment when, from a singularity, He spoke everything into being.  If He permits.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/colossal-distant-black-hole-holds-surprises-early-universe-235944871.html

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  11
  • Topic Count:  19
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  3,396
  • Content Per Day:  0.90
  • Reputation:   730
  • Days Won:  4
  • Joined:  12/21/2013
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  12/26/1963

10 hours ago, MorningGlory said:

Astronomers have discovered a giant 'black hole' millions of light years away that offers a glimpse into the universe as it was over thirteen billion years ago.  This is how God laid things out and I believe we are getting closer to being able to see that moment when, from a singularity, He spoke everything into being.  If He permits.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/colossal-distant-black-hole-holds-surprises-early-universe-235944871.html

1.  astronomy isn't "Science" and astronomers aren't "Scientists".

2.  Scientifically Validate "black holes"...

a.  What Phenomenon was Observed...?
b.  Post the Formal Scientific Hypothesis then EXPERIMENT that validates your claim...?
c.  Highlight the "Independent Variable" that was used in the TEST...?
d.  Post the Null Hypothesis that was Rejected/Falsified...?

3.  Scientifically Validate 13 Billion Years...? (See: The Scientific Method above).

4.  Show a 'singularity' in Scripture...?

5.  Post a PIC of this 'black hole'...?

 

 

regards

  • This is Worthy 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  1,022
  • Topics Per Day:  0.16
  • Content Count:  39,193
  • Content Per Day:  6.11
  • Reputation:   9,977
  • Days Won:  78
  • Joined:  10/01/2006
  • Status:  Offline

1 hour ago, Enoch2021 said:

1.  astronomy isn't "Science" and astronomers aren't "Scientists".

2.  Scientifically Validate "black holes"...

a.  What Phenomenon was Observed...?
b.  Post the Formal Scientific Hypothesis then EXPERIMENT that validates your claim...?
c.  Highlight the "Independent Variable" that was used in the TEST...?
d.  Post the Null Hypothesis that was Rejected/Falsified...?

3.  Scientifically Validate 13 Billion Years...? (See: The Scientific Method above).

4.  Show a 'singularity' in Scripture...?

5.  Post a PIC of this 'black hole'...?

 

 

regards

I'm not posting any of that and your numbered lists are really tiresome .  I refer you to the article.  It's all in there except for a photo of the black hole.  Astronomers ARE scientists....you are not.  If you know Scripture you know that God spoke everything into being.  His word was the singularity.  Not hard to figure out.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  11
  • Topic Count:  19
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  3,396
  • Content Per Day:  0.90
  • Reputation:   730
  • Days Won:  4
  • Joined:  12/21/2013
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  12/26/1963

6 minutes ago, MorningGlory said:

I'm not posting any of that and your numbered lists are really tiresome . 

Yes, because you can't SUPPORT your PARROTED Claims.

 

Quote

I refer you to the article.

They can't SUPPORT them either.

 

Quote

 It's all in there except for a photo of the black hole. 

What's a Black Hole??  Then Scientifically Validate...

a.  What Phenomenon was Observed...?
b.  Post the Formal Scientific Hypothesis then EXPERIMENT that validates your claim...?
c.  Highlight the "Independent Variable" that was used in the TEST...?
d.  Post the Null Hypothesis that was Rejected/Falsified...?

 

Quote

Astronomers ARE scientists...

:groan:  Really WHY...?

 

Do you understand the Concept of SUPPORTING what you say, by chance?

Juxtapose (Compare and Contrast) SUPPORTED Claims vs Baseless 'bare' Assertions...?

 

Quote

you are not.

My University Transcripts and Professional Evaluations would beg to differ.  ;)

 

Quote

If you know Scripture you know that God spoke everything into being.

Yes, that's Correct.

 

Quote

His word was the singularity. 

So God's Word is the big bang's "Singularity", eh?  :groan:

 

Quote

Not hard to figure out.

How did you figure that one out, por favor...?  Illustrate your 'Method'...?

 

regards

  • This is Worthy 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  22
  • Topic Count:  138
  • Topics Per Day:  0.04
  • Content Count:  4,181
  • Content Per Day:  1.22
  • Reputation:   3,070
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  11/28/2014
  • Status:  Offline

1 hour ago, MorningGlory said:

I'm not posting any of that and your numbered

Why? because you don't have any? if so prove it.

1 hour ago, MorningGlory said:

Astronomers ARE scientists....you are not. 

Are you?

Is this not a discussion?

1 hour ago, MorningGlory said:

If you know Scripture

From all that I have seen that Enoch2021 presents, he knows his subject very very well, and gives always biblical references as proof.

I never see you at any given time give any biblical proof in going against Enoch's findings in the bible. Just verbal dismissals. Perhaps because you cannot find any?

3 hours ago, Enoch2021 said:

4.  Show a 'singularity' in Scripture...?

Enoch2021 is quite thorough concerning bible facts, and Is so appreciated for his intelligent responses . Thank you enoch2021, for keeping Gods Word as our defense against this worlds ways of deception.

 

In Christ Jesus Always;

regards

 

 

 

Edited by 1to3
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  34
  • Topic Count:  1,990
  • Topics Per Day:  0.48
  • Content Count:  48,688
  • Content Per Day:  11.83
  • Reputation:   30,343
  • Days Won:  226
  • Joined:  01/11/2013
  • Status:  Offline

Black holes are simply God's created universe. I will leave that to Him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  1,022
  • Topics Per Day:  0.16
  • Content Count:  39,193
  • Content Per Day:  6.11
  • Reputation:   9,977
  • Days Won:  78
  • Joined:  10/01/2006
  • Status:  Offline

2 hours ago, Enoch2021 said:

Yes, because you can't SUPPORT your PARROTED Claims.

 

They can't SUPPORT them either.

 

What's a Black Hole??  Then Scientifically Validate...

a.  What Phenomenon was Observed...?
b.  Post the Formal Scientific Hypothesis then EXPERIMENT that validates your claim...?
c.  Highlight the "Independent Variable" that was used in the TEST...?
d.  Post the Null Hypothesis that was Rejected/Falsified...?

 

:groan:  Really WHY...?

 

Do you understand the Concept of SUPPORTING what you say, by chance?

Juxtapose (Compare and Contrast) SUPPORTED Claims vs Baseless 'bare' Assertions...?

 

My University Transcripts and Professional Evaluations would beg to differ.  ;)

 

Yes, that's Correct.

 

So God's Word is the big bang's "Singularity", eh?  :groan:

 

How did you figure that one out, por favor...?  Illustrate your 'Method'...?

 

regards

The 'method' would have to be explained by the scientists who made these observations.  Your constant repeating yourself will not convince anyone that you are a 'scientist'.  If you challenge these observations please contact those who made them.  I know that God created the universe, He spoke everything into being, and that is that.  You are hardly qualified to dispute the claims of those who study these things.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  1,022
  • Topics Per Day:  0.16
  • Content Count:  39,193
  • Content Per Day:  6.11
  • Reputation:   9,977
  • Days Won:  78
  • Joined:  10/01/2006
  • Status:  Offline

1 hour ago, 1to3 said:

Why? because you don't have any? if so prove it.

Are you?

Is this not a discussion?

From all that I have seen that Enoch2021 presents, he knows his subject very very well, and gives always biblical references as proof.

I never see you at any given time give any biblical proof in going against Enoch's findings in the bible. Just verbal dismissals. Perhaps because you cannot find any?

Enoch2021 is quite thorough concerning bible facts, and Is so appreciated for his intelligent responses . Thank you enoch2021, for keeping Gods Word as our defense against this worlds ways of deception.

 

In Christ Jesus Always;

regards

 

 

 

None of that was addressed to you but yes, this is a discussion. Unlike others here, I don't pretend to be a scientist and  post endless pontification on why I know everything.  I stand by what I post and if you don't agree with it....not my problem.  Those who can't believe anything but their own words live in a very small world.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  11
  • Topic Count:  19
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  3,396
  • Content Per Day:  0.90
  • Reputation:   730
  • Days Won:  4
  • Joined:  12/21/2013
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  12/26/1963

1 hour ago, MorningGlory said:

The 'method' would have to be explained by the scientists who made these observations.

So you're PARROTING what you've been told without Due Diligence. 

 

Quote

Your constant repeating yourself will not convince anyone that you are a 'scientist'.

If they can't figure it out in less than a Planck Time by the mere content of my posts...they have more "Pressing Issues".

 

Quote

If you challenge these observations please contact those who made them. 

I have for the Past 12 Years...they just call me names :rolleyes:.

You're PARROTING these Claims as TRUTH, so I challenged you to validate them.   

ps.  It's NOT "My" Job to Validate "YOUR" PARROTINGS.

 

Quote

You are hardly qualified to dispute the claims of those who study these things.

I'm actually More Qualified than them because I know what ACTUAL "Science" is; whereas, they do not.

 

regards

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  1,022
  • Topics Per Day:  0.16
  • Content Count:  39,193
  • Content Per Day:  6.11
  • Reputation:   9,977
  • Days Won:  78
  • Joined:  10/01/2006
  • Status:  Offline

1 hour ago, Enoch2021 said:

 

.

 

I'm actually More Qualified than them because I know what ACTUAL "Science" is; whereas, they do not.

 

regards

Wow, then one would think you would be all in the news, huh?  :24:

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...