MorningGlory Posted December 24, 2017 Group: Royal Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 1,022 Topics Per Day: 0.16 Content Count: 39,193 Content Per Day: 6.12 Reputation: 9,977 Days Won: 78 Joined: 10/01/2006 Status: Offline Author Share Posted December 24, 2017 5 minutes ago, Enoch2021 said: Again. It's not that "I Believe" it's an Abject Speculation... it "IS" an Abject Speculation. And I just showed you quite Explicitly "WHY". Why?? You were the one who PARROTED it as Legitimate. WHY do you believe her Abject Speculation makes sense...? regards Because I believe it makes sense and I owe you no other explanation. Speaking of parroting, you repeat things over and over and over...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeyondET Posted December 24, 2017 Group: Royal Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 118 Topics Per Day: 0.05 Content Count: 2,868 Content Per Day: 1.23 Reputation: 816 Days Won: 0 Joined: 11/29/2017 Status: Offline Birthday: 04/01/1968 Share Posted December 24, 2017 16 minutes ago, Enoch2021 said: Yes and Pocahontas was a MI6 Mermaid and the mastermind behind the sinking of the Lusitania. Are you gonna CITE this appropriately or leave this as Plagiarized? Well the First Step of the Scientific Method is: "Observe A Phenomenon". So, this isn't "Science". It's a "Just-So" Story. Well, Scientifically Validate... a. What Phenomenon was Observed...? b. Post the Formal Scientific Hypothesis then EXPERIMENT that validates your claim...? c. Highlight the "Independent Variable" that was used in the TEST...? d. Post the Null Hypothesis that was Rejected/Falsified...? Begging The Question (Fallacy): 'black hole'. You can't use what your attempting to prove as a premise, until you've VALIDATED IT. Begging The Question Fallacy (x2). 'Hubble Telescope' and 'Space' (Vacuum of Space). Please Validate...? Rinse/Repeat for the rest of this Treatise. regards Can you validate God is in Heaven? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeyondET Posted December 24, 2017 Group: Royal Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 118 Topics Per Day: 0.05 Content Count: 2,868 Content Per Day: 1.23 Reputation: 816 Days Won: 0 Joined: 11/29/2017 Status: Offline Birthday: 04/01/1968 Share Posted December 24, 2017 17 hours ago, Enoch2021 said: Black Holes don't EXIST!! 1. Scientifically Validate Black Holes... a. What Phenomenon was Observed...? b. Post the Formal Scientific Hypothesis then EXPERIMENT that validates your claim...? c. Highlight the "Independent Variable" that was used in the TEST...? d. Post the Null Hypothesis that was Rejected/Falsified...? 2. Black Holes were conjured from the "DeBunked" Mytho-matheMagics of Einstein's Field Equations... 'Black Holes were first discovered as purely mathematical solutions of Einstein's field equations. This solution, the Schwarzschild black hole, is a nonlinear solution of the Einstein equations of general Relativity. It contains no matter, and exists forever in an asymptotically flat space-time." Dictionary of Geophysics, Astrophysics, and Astronomy, pg 55 "It contains no matter" oh my, come again? "and exists forever"... in the Imagination. Translation: Fairytale Can you show us one? If you can't show one, can you please at least show ONE Solution to ANY of Einstein's "DeBunked" Mytho-matheMagical Field Equations for 2 or more masses? I'll save you some time... It Doesn't Exist ! regards I see you keep saying you need proof and validation, yet I know in what ever it is you believe you can not prove or validate anything 100% Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enoch2021 Posted December 24, 2017 Group: Royal Member Followers: 11 Topic Count: 19 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 3,396 Content Per Day: 0.90 Reputation: 730 Days Won: 4 Joined: 12/21/2013 Status: Offline Birthday: 12/26/1963 Share Posted December 24, 2017 35 minutes ago, MorningGlory said: Why do y9u do this, Enoch? To EXPOSE Pretender Clowns. Quote Always demanding other members post scientific research for theories of others? Yes, I always demand others SUPPORT their Claims (PARROTED or Personal). I know, OUTLANDISH!! How dare I Quote You know no one is going to do it so why bother? Yes, because they're PARROTING Fairytales... which ='s Pretender Clowns. See the point? Quote Your demands are tiresome and redundant So are the Claims. Since the claims come first, that Ipso Facto relieves the burden on the respondee. Quote since they are being made to those reporting science news Reporting Fairytale News. Quote not to the researchers who actually did the work. The 'researchers' aren't Scientists. Quote If you have greater knowledge than the people that come up with theories why waste your time on a Christian site? 1. Yes, I do. 2. The 'people' aren't coming up with "Scientific Theories", they're Masquerading then Postulating Fairytales under the term "Science". 3. Well the Parroting Pretender Clowns frequent Christian Sites to promote their Nonsensical Buffoonery Horse Pucky...Ergo, I come in and QUASH them. regards Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enoch2021 Posted December 24, 2017 Group: Royal Member Followers: 11 Topic Count: 19 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 3,396 Content Per Day: 0.90 Reputation: 730 Days Won: 4 Joined: 12/21/2013 Status: Offline Birthday: 12/26/1963 Share Posted December 24, 2017 49 minutes ago, MorningGlory said: Because I believe it makes sense I asked you WHY you believe Abject Speculations makes sense. Repeating the same thing isn't an answer. Quote and I owe you no other explanation. So you don't think you should SUPPORT your PARROTED Claims? Do you understand the concept of SUPPORTING Claims? Please Juxtapose (Compare and Contrast) Supported Claims vs Baseless Assertions (Fallacies)...? Quote Speaking of parroting, you repeat things over and over and over...... You're somewhat confused. PARROTING is Mindlessly Repeating what "OTHERS" say. I'm not Repeating what others say, I'm repeating what "I" say in response to the PARROTINGS of others. See the difference? regards Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enoch2021 Posted December 24, 2017 Group: Royal Member Followers: 11 Topic Count: 19 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 3,396 Content Per Day: 0.90 Reputation: 730 Days Won: 4 Joined: 12/21/2013 Status: Offline Birthday: 12/26/1963 Share Posted December 24, 2017 59 minutes ago, BeyondET said: I see you keep saying you need proof and validation Yes, it's a Request for others to SUPPORT their Claims. Quote yet I know in what ever it is you believe you can not prove or validate anything 100% Red Herring (Fallacy) - is a fallacy in which an irrelevant topic is presented in order to divert attention from the original issue.http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/red-herring.html Quote Can you validate God is in Heaven? Red Herring Fallacy. Start another thread and I'll be more than happy to address your concerns. For now, Scientifically Validate your Black Hole Fairytale...? regards Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeyondET Posted December 24, 2017 Group: Royal Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 118 Topics Per Day: 0.05 Content Count: 2,868 Content Per Day: 1.23 Reputation: 816 Days Won: 0 Joined: 11/29/2017 Status: Offline Birthday: 04/01/1968 Share Posted December 24, 2017 (edited) 7 minutes ago, Enoch2021 said: Yes, it's a Request for others to SUPPORT their Claims. Red Herring (Fallacy) - is a fallacy in which an irrelevant topic is presented in order to divert attention from the original issue.http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/red-herring.html Red Herring Fallacy. Start another thread and I'll be more than happy to address your concerns. For now, Scientifically Validate your Black Hole Fairytale...? regards As I already knew you would run from the question I ask, what do you believe in, and your answer was null. you use deversion tactics so you can continue your assault on others. the most humorous thing is your interest in Other sciences yet you pick and chose which one to believe in Microbiology/Biochemistry/Physics/Genetics Edited December 24, 2017 by BeyondET Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enoch2021 Posted December 24, 2017 Group: Royal Member Followers: 11 Topic Count: 19 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 3,396 Content Per Day: 0.90 Reputation: 730 Days Won: 4 Joined: 12/21/2013 Status: Offline Birthday: 12/26/1963 Share Posted December 24, 2017 7 minutes ago, BeyondET said: As I already knew you would run from the question I ask 1. Your question was a Red Herring Fallacy Diversion. 2. How did you know?? What Method did you use...? Quote you use deversion tactics so you can continue your assault on others. So let me get this straight, you post a Red Herring Fallacy...A DIVERSION, then accuse me of Diversionary Tactics, eh? Quote the most humorous thing is your interest in Other sciences yet you pick and chose which one to believe in I don't 'believe' in "Sciences"...they either follow The Scientific Method --"Science" or they don't -- Not Sciences. regards Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeyondET Posted December 24, 2017 Group: Royal Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 118 Topics Per Day: 0.05 Content Count: 2,868 Content Per Day: 1.23 Reputation: 816 Days Won: 0 Joined: 11/29/2017 Status: Offline Birthday: 04/01/1968 Share Posted December 24, 2017 (edited) 23 minutes ago, Enoch2021 said: 1. Your question was a Red Herring Fallacy Diversion. 2. How did you know?? What Method did you use...? So let me get this straight, you post a Red Herring Fallacy...A DIVERSION, then accuse me of Diversionary Tactics, eh? I don't 'believe' in "Sciences"...they either follow The Scientific Method --"Science" or they don't -- Not Sciences. regards The red herring fallacy that is what you posted, who are trying to fool, not me Sir. you do like to twist things I don't believe your a man of God at all, no man of God would twist someone's words around, like you done saying I posted the red herring fallacy. Edited December 24, 2017 by BeyondET 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MorningGlory Posted December 24, 2017 Group: Royal Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 1,022 Topics Per Day: 0.16 Content Count: 39,193 Content Per Day: 6.12 Reputation: 9,977 Days Won: 78 Joined: 10/01/2006 Status: Offline Author Share Posted December 24, 2017 32 minutes ago, Enoch2021 said: I asked you WHY you believe Abject Speculations makes sense. Repeating the same thing isn't an answer. So you don't think you should SUPPORT your PARROTED Claims? Do you understand the concept of SUPPORTING Claims? Please Juxtapose (Compare and Contrast) Supported Claims vs Baseless Assertions (Fallacies)...? You're somewhat confused. PARROTING is Mindlessly Repeating what "OTHERS" say. I'm not Repeating what others say, I'm repeating what "I" say in response to the PARROTINGS of others. See the difference? regards As has been explained to you many, many times.....i'm not going to support the research or findings of those who provided them for the article. I posted an article, I agree with the premise of that article. You can bloviate all day long but you can't bully anyone here into seeing things your way. If you were a scientist, as you claim, you would know to contact the actual researchers for methods and explanations. Clanging cymbals seldom get the result they are aiming for. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts