Jump to content
IGNORED

Renowned physicist's theory spells trouble for atheists


MorningGlory

Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  1,022
  • Topics Per Day:  0.16
  • Content Count:  39,193
  • Content Per Day:  6.11
  • Reputation:   9,977
  • Days Won:  78
  • Joined:  10/01/2006
  • Status:  Offline

1 hour ago, Enoch2021 said:

Who cares, He's not a Scientist.  Even if he was... still, who cares.

It's akin to heading up to Walmart and asking a random person the same questions.

 

regards

Dr. Kaku is a world renowned physicist.  I don't think you are in his league.  Have any thoughts about his comments in the article?  You know, THE TOPIC OF THIS THREAD?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  1,022
  • Topics Per Day:  0.16
  • Content Count:  39,193
  • Content Per Day:  6.11
  • Reputation:   9,977
  • Days Won:  78
  • Joined:  10/01/2006
  • Status:  Offline

1 hour ago, Enoch2021 said:

Yea, because NONE of it is "Science".

 

"Science" isn't an ENTITY or a result, It's a Method; The Scientific Method.  "Science" doesn't: "WORK", say, jump, run, swim, point to, or do the hokey pokey.  To do such things takes, Sentience, Prescience, and Intelligence...to be ALIVE.  Science isn't ALIVE, Ergo...Reification Fallacy.

 

regards

And you are an expert because.....?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  11
  • Topic Count:  19
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  3,396
  • Content Per Day:  0.90
  • Reputation:   730
  • Days Won:  4
  • Joined:  12/21/2013
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  12/26/1963

3 minutes ago, MorningGlory said:

Dr. Kaku is a world renowned physicist.

Factually Incorrect:


Michio Kaku is a Japanese American theoretical physicist, futurist, and popularizer of science. He is professor of theoretical physics at the City College of New York and CUNY Graduate Center.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michio_Kaku

 

Quote

I don't think you are in his league. 

Correct My League is "SCIENCE".  His League is "Fairytales"....with a Mytho-matheMAGICAL twist.

 

Quote

Have any thoughts about his comments in the article?

Yes, they were less coherent/insightful than what my 12 year old daughter realized 4 years ago.

 

Quote

And you are an expert because.....?

Because I have Two Degrees in an ACTUAL "Science" Discipline and worked half my life in said discipline.

 

regards

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  1,022
  • Topics Per Day:  0.16
  • Content Count:  39,193
  • Content Per Day:  6.11
  • Reputation:   9,977
  • Days Won:  78
  • Joined:  10/01/2006
  • Status:  Offline

1 hour ago, 1to3 said:

This article states that NASA and our government are covering up UFO activity and bases on the moon.  There is no such thing as an alien UFO or an alien from another planet.  I see this stuff on 'Ancient Aliens' all the time.  Other Cts promoting a domed Earth don't fit with this one since they claim there IS no outer space and the moon is within the dome

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  1,022
  • Topics Per Day:  0.16
  • Content Count:  39,193
  • Content Per Day:  6.11
  • Reputation:   9,977
  • Days Won:  78
  • Joined:  10/01/2006
  • Status:  Offline

3 minutes ago, Enoch2021 said:

Factually Incorrect:


Michio Kaku is a Japanese American theoretical physicist, futurist, and popularizer of science. He is professor of theoretical physics at the City College of New York and CUNY Graduate Center.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michio_Kaku

 

Correct My League is "SCIENCE".  His League is "Fairytales"....with a Mytho-matheMAGICAL twist.

 

Yes, they were less coherent/insightful than what my 12 year old daughter realized 4 years ago.

 

Because I have Two Degrees in an ACTUAL "Science" Discipline and worked half my life in said discipline.

 

regards

I'm sorry but you don't promote science; you promote CTs pretty much exclusively. 

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Oy Vey! 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  11
  • Topic Count:  19
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  3,396
  • Content Per Day:  0.90
  • Reputation:   730
  • Days Won:  4
  • Joined:  12/21/2013
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  12/26/1963

9 minutes ago, MorningGlory said:

I'm sorry but you don't promote science

Really?  For instance...?

 

Quote

you promote CTs pretty much exclusively. 

What are "CT's"...?

THEN, show a for instance...?

 

ps.  Why do you incessantly quote my ENTIRE POSTS...but never actually speak to any of the POINTS within what you have quoted??

 

 

regards

  • Brilliant! 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  22
  • Topic Count:  138
  • Topics Per Day:  0.04
  • Content Count:  4,216
  • Content Per Day:  1.23
  • Reputation:   3,073
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  11/28/2014
  • Status:  Offline

27 minutes ago, MorningGlory said:
  1 hour ago, 1to3 said:

NASA? once a liar....

My point was : NASA ARE LIARS

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  1,022
  • Topics Per Day:  0.16
  • Content Count:  39,193
  • Content Per Day:  6.11
  • Reputation:   9,977
  • Days Won:  78
  • Joined:  10/01/2006
  • Status:  Offline

19 minutes ago, Enoch2021 said:

 

 

What are "CT's"...?

ps.  Why do you incessantly quote my ENTIRE POSTS...but never actually speak to any of the POINTS within what you have quoted??

 

 

regards

I can start only quoting the part I'm responding to if that's what you feel is necessary.  I don't DO long posts usually.  CTs are conspiracy theories.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  1,022
  • Topics Per Day:  0.16
  • Content Count:  39,193
  • Content Per Day:  6.11
  • Reputation:   9,977
  • Days Won:  78
  • Joined:  10/01/2006
  • Status:  Offline

8 minutes ago, 1to3 said:

My point was : NASA ARE LIARS

I'm sure there are liars in every organization.  We certainly see them in government every day.  But I see no reason for a cover up of alleged UFOs since millions believe in them anyway.  There would be no point.  And, if a government has a base on the moon, they are unstoppable and will control the world.  I don't believe that one either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  11
  • Topic Count:  19
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  3,396
  • Content Per Day:  0.90
  • Reputation:   730
  • Days Won:  4
  • Joined:  12/21/2013
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  12/26/1963

23 minutes ago, MorningGlory said:

I can start only quoting the part I'm responding to if that's what you feel is necessary.

Yes, it would be more coherent.

 

Quote

 CTs are conspiracy theories.

ok.

You forgot to answer these...

"Really?  For instance...?"  In response to your 'claim': "I'm sorry but you don't promote science"

and...

"THEN, show a for instance...?" In response to your 'claim': "you promote CTs pretty much exclusively." 

 

Or should we just chalk these up as your Garden Variety: Generalized Sweeping Ipse Dixit Baseless 'bare' Assertion Fallacies that contain as much Veracity as Phlogiston?

 

regards

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...