OldSchool2 Posted January 15, 2018 Group: Royal Member Followers: 7 Topic Count: 701 Topics Per Day: 0.13 Content Count: 7,511 Content Per Day: 1.35 Reputation: 1,759 Days Won: 0 Joined: 01/16/2009 Status: Offline Birthday: 02/18/1955 Share Posted January 15, 2018 6 minutes ago, shiloh357 said: This is a political thing. It has nothing to do with any genuine interest about the welfare of the country.... Preventing a high-ranking U.S. politician from triggering a nuclear exchange by his trolling of a Koran dictator on Twitter is about the welfare of several countries, if not the entire world. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
missmuffet Posted January 15, 2018 Group: Royal Member Followers: 34 Topic Count: 1,989 Topics Per Day: 0.49 Content Count: 48,687 Content Per Day: 11.89 Reputation: 30,342 Days Won: 226 Joined: 01/11/2013 Status: Offline Share Posted January 15, 2018 6 minutes ago, OldSchool2 said: Preventing a high-ranking U.S. politician from triggering a nuclear exchange by his trolling of a Koran dictator on Twitter is about the welfare of several countries, if not the entire world. I have thought of that. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest shiloh357 Posted January 15, 2018 Share Posted January 15, 2018 7 minutes ago, OldSchool2 said: Preventing a high-ranking U.S. politician from triggering a nuclear exchange by his trolling of a Koran dictator on Twitter is about the welfare of several countries, if not the entire world. The problem is that he was not trolling the NK leader. He was standing up to him and not being intimidated by him. And now peace talks are taking place. So, you can say what you want, but nothing you say is really comporting with the reality taking place on the ground. And even the SK president is saying that it is because of Trump that these talks are taking place. Trump hasn't made things worse, no matter what you say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ayin jade Posted January 15, 2018 Group: Worthy Ministers Followers: 44 Topic Count: 6,178 Topics Per Day: 0.88 Content Count: 43,784 Content Per Day: 6.23 Reputation: 11,227 Days Won: 58 Joined: 01/03/2005 Status: Offline Author Share Posted January 15, 2018 38 minutes ago, OldSchool2 said: Forensic psychologists like Dr. Lee err on the side of caution as they try to stop patients from instigating a nuclear disaster, not analyzing the result after it's too late. Which is against their standard of ethics in psychiatry. They cannot legally, ethically, professionally, diagnose a patient without a face to face exam. So their conclusions are meaningless. You do not work in the medical field so perhaps that is difficult to understand, but that type of thing goes against their own professional standards of practice. That type of diagnosis would never be accepted if it was claimed against any other public figure based solely on what they gleaned from the media and not from any face to face interaction. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ayin jade Posted January 15, 2018 Group: Worthy Ministers Followers: 44 Topic Count: 6,178 Topics Per Day: 0.88 Content Count: 43,784 Content Per Day: 6.23 Reputation: 11,227 Days Won: 58 Joined: 01/03/2005 Status: Offline Author Share Posted January 15, 2018 31 minutes ago, shiloh357 said: This is a political thing. It has nothing to do with any genuine interest about the welfare of the country. And furthermore the president of South Korea credits Trump for the peace talks that are now happening between SK and NK. The Left was screeching to the heavens that Trump's rhetoric was going to get us in a war and the opposite is actually what is happening. The Left is always wrong and should not be taken seriously. And neither should Dr. Lee. She is just a political tool for the Left. 21 minutes ago, OldSchool2 said: Preventing a high-ranking U.S. politician from triggering a nuclear exchange by his trolling of a Koran dictator on Twitter is about the welfare of several countries, if not the entire world. There isnt anything to fret over. There are peace talks going on, thanks to trump according to korea. Much ado about nothing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest shiloh357 Posted January 15, 2018 Share Posted January 15, 2018 12 minutes ago, ayin jade said: There isnt anything to fret over. There are peace talks going on, thanks to trump according to korea. Much ado about nothing. Yes, precisely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
missmuffet Posted January 15, 2018 Group: Royal Member Followers: 34 Topic Count: 1,989 Topics Per Day: 0.49 Content Count: 48,687 Content Per Day: 11.89 Reputation: 30,342 Days Won: 226 Joined: 01/11/2013 Status: Offline Share Posted January 15, 2018 1 hour ago, ayin jade said: There isnt anything to fret over. There are peace talks going on, thanks to trump according to korea. Much ado about nothing. Time will tell. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SavedByGrace1981 Posted January 15, 2018 Group: Royal Member Followers: 6 Topic Count: 104 Topics Per Day: 0.02 Content Count: 2,923 Content Per Day: 0.62 Reputation: 462 Days Won: 2 Joined: 04/02/2011 Status: Offline Birthday: 03/22/1953 Share Posted January 15, 2018 I've been thinking about these daily anti-Trump threads, and my Christian brothers and sisters who post on them and applaud them. The Apostle Paul's words in 1 Cor. 10:23 come to mind: “I have the right to do anything,” you say—but not everything is beneficial. “I have the right to do anything”—but not everything is constructive. Also the Commandment against '. . . bearing false witness'. Our country is plagued by citizens with many diverse voices - some of them have evil and divisive intent. As Christians, we are called to a higher purpose. It's fine to have differing POLITICAL opinions (Jesus' disciples ran the gamut from Matthew who served the hated Romans as a tax collector; to Simon the Zealot who wanted to overthrow Rome), I believe Christians are called to a higher purpose than contributing to the division. My advice would be before posting, ask yourself: "Is what I'm about to post going to heal; or is it going to divide?" Just my $0.02. Blessings, -Ed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hmbld Posted January 15, 2018 Group: Diamond Member Followers: 4 Topic Count: 48 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 2,491 Content Per Day: 0.55 Reputation: 1,457 Days Won: 1 Joined: 10/23/2011 Status: Offline Birthday: 02/02/1971 Share Posted January 15, 2018 7 minutes ago, SavedByGrace1981 said: I've been thinking about these daily anti-Trump threads, and my Christian brothers and sisters who post on them and applaud them. The Apostle Paul's words in 1 Cor. 10:23 come to mind: “I have the right to do anything,” you say—but not everything is beneficial. “I have the right to do anything”—but not everything is constructive. Also the Commandment against '. . . bearing false witness'. Our country is plagued by citizens with many diverse voices - some of them have evil and divisive intent. As Christians, we are called to a higher purpose. It's fine to have differing POLITICAL opinions (Jesus' disciples ran the gamut from Matthew who served the hated Romans as a tax collector; to Simon the Zealot who wanted to overthrow Rome), I believe Christians are called to a higher purpose than contributing to the division. My advice would be before posting, ask yourself: "Is what I'm about to post going to heal; or is it going to divide?" Just my $0.02. Blessings, -Ed Exactly. It’s usually not even the issues, but the remarks are derogatory of a person. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldSchool2 Posted January 15, 2018 Group: Royal Member Followers: 7 Topic Count: 701 Topics Per Day: 0.13 Content Count: 7,511 Content Per Day: 1.35 Reputation: 1,759 Days Won: 0 Joined: 01/16/2009 Status: Offline Birthday: 02/18/1955 Share Posted January 15, 2018 3 hours ago, ayin jade said: Which is against their standard of ethics in psychiatry. They cannot legally, ethically, professionally, diagnose a patient without a face to face exam. So their conclusions are meaningless. You do not work in the medical field so perhaps that is difficult to understand.... Au contraire, I was a medical technologist in toxicology at Yale for years and my sister is a nurse. And according to D.r Lee, forensic assessments are not a diagnosis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts